Cargando…

RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline

The purpose of this review article is to familiarize radiologists with the recently revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), used in many anticancer drug trials to assess response and progression rate. The most important modifications are: a reduction in the maximum number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Persijn van Meerten, Els L., Gelderblom, Hans, Bloem, Johan L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20033179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1685-y
_version_ 1782181195078959104
author van Persijn van Meerten, Els L.
Gelderblom, Hans
Bloem, Johan L.
author_facet van Persijn van Meerten, Els L.
Gelderblom, Hans
Bloem, Johan L.
author_sort van Persijn van Meerten, Els L.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this review article is to familiarize radiologists with the recently revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), used in many anticancer drug trials to assess response and progression rate. The most important modifications are: a reduction in the maximum number of target lesions from ten to five, with a maximum of two per organ, with a longest diameter of at least 10 mm; in lymph nodes (LNs) the short axis rather than the long axis should be measured, with normal LN measuring <10 mm, non-target LN ≥10 mm but <15 mm and target LN ≥15 mm; osteolytic lesions with a soft tissue component and cystic tumours may serve as target lesions; an additional requirement for progressive disease (PD) of target lesions is not only a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) from the nadir but also a ≥5 mm absolute increase in the SLD (the other response categories of target lesion are unchanged); PD of non-target lesions can only be applied if the increase in non-target lesions is representative of change in overall tumour burden; detailed imaging guidelines. Alternative response criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2872013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28720132010-05-26 RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline van Persijn van Meerten, Els L. Gelderblom, Hans Bloem, Johan L. Eur Radiol Oncology The purpose of this review article is to familiarize radiologists with the recently revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), used in many anticancer drug trials to assess response and progression rate. The most important modifications are: a reduction in the maximum number of target lesions from ten to five, with a maximum of two per organ, with a longest diameter of at least 10 mm; in lymph nodes (LNs) the short axis rather than the long axis should be measured, with normal LN measuring <10 mm, non-target LN ≥10 mm but <15 mm and target LN ≥15 mm; osteolytic lesions with a soft tissue component and cystic tumours may serve as target lesions; an additional requirement for progressive disease (PD) of target lesions is not only a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) from the nadir but also a ≥5 mm absolute increase in the SLD (the other response categories of target lesion are unchanged); PD of non-target lesions can only be applied if the increase in non-target lesions is representative of change in overall tumour burden; detailed imaging guidelines. Alternative response criteria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours are discussed. Springer-Verlag 2009-12-22 2010-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2872013/ /pubmed/20033179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1685-y Text en © Springer 2009
spellingShingle Oncology
van Persijn van Meerten, Els L.
Gelderblom, Hans
Bloem, Johan L.
RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title_full RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title_fullStr RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title_full_unstemmed RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title_short RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline
title_sort recist revised: implications for the radiologist. a review article on the modified recist guideline
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20033179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1685-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpersijnvanmeertenelsl recistrevisedimplicationsfortheradiologistareviewarticleonthemodifiedrecistguideline
AT gelderblomhans recistrevisedimplicationsfortheradiologistareviewarticleonthemodifiedrecistguideline
AT bloemjohanl recistrevisedimplicationsfortheradiologistareviewarticleonthemodifiedrecistguideline