Cargando…

Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Three of the most commonly used agents for conscious sedation in the Emergency Department (ED) are ketamine, fentanyl/versed, and propofol. In this study, we measured and compared the total times spent in the ED with each of these agents. Our objective was to determine whether the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorchynski, Julie, Wang, Scott, Anderson, Craig, Montano, Jara
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: California Chapter of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505814
_version_ 1782181225854664704
author Gorchynski, Julie
Wang, Scott
Anderson, Craig
Montano, Jara
author_facet Gorchynski, Julie
Wang, Scott
Anderson, Craig
Montano, Jara
author_sort Gorchynski, Julie
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVES: Three of the most commonly used agents for conscious sedation in the Emergency Department (ED) are ketamine, fentanyl/versed, and propofol. In this study, we measured and compared the total times spent in the ED with each of these agents. Our objective was to determine whether the use of propofol for conscious sedation was associated with a shorter length of ED stay as compared to the other two agents. METHODS: This was a consecutive case series. All patients who required procedural conscious sedation who presented to the ED at University of California, Irvine Medical Center from January 2003 through April 2004 were included in the study. The attending ED physician evaluated the patient and determined which medication(s) would be administered. All patients underwent procedural sedation according to the ED’s standardized sedation protocol. The times and dosages of administered medications and the sedation/consciousness level (SCL) scores were recorded by ED nurses at 3–5 minute intervals. Data was abstracted prospectively. The time to sedation (first dose of agent to SCL score of 2 or less) and time to recovery (last dose of agent to SCL score of 4) of the different regimens were then analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received propofol, 38 received ketamine, and 14 received fentanyl/versed. The mean times to sedation (minutes) were: propofol 4.5 (95% CI: 3.3–5.7), ketamine 10.6 (95% CI: 5.8–15.4), fentanyl/versed 11.5 (95% CI: 3.5–19.4). The mean times to recovery were: propofol 21.6 (95% CI: 16.1–27.1), ketamine 55.4 (95% CI: 46.2–64.5), fentanyl/versed 59.9 (95% CI: 20.3–99.5). Propofol had a statistically significant shorter time to sedation than both ketamine (p<.001) and fentanyl/versed (p=.022). Propofol also produced shorter recovery times than both ketamine (p<.001) and fentanyl/versed (p=.002). CONCLUSION: In this study, sedation and recovery times were shorter with propofol than with ketamine or fentanyl/versed. The use of propofol for conscious sedation in this non-randomized study was associated with a shorter ED length of stay.
format Text
id pubmed-2872520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher California Chapter of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28725202010-05-26 Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed Gorchynski, Julie Wang, Scott Anderson, Craig Montano, Jara Cal J Emerg Med Original Research STUDY OBJECTIVES: Three of the most commonly used agents for conscious sedation in the Emergency Department (ED) are ketamine, fentanyl/versed, and propofol. In this study, we measured and compared the total times spent in the ED with each of these agents. Our objective was to determine whether the use of propofol for conscious sedation was associated with a shorter length of ED stay as compared to the other two agents. METHODS: This was a consecutive case series. All patients who required procedural conscious sedation who presented to the ED at University of California, Irvine Medical Center from January 2003 through April 2004 were included in the study. The attending ED physician evaluated the patient and determined which medication(s) would be administered. All patients underwent procedural sedation according to the ED’s standardized sedation protocol. The times and dosages of administered medications and the sedation/consciousness level (SCL) scores were recorded by ED nurses at 3–5 minute intervals. Data was abstracted prospectively. The time to sedation (first dose of agent to SCL score of 2 or less) and time to recovery (last dose of agent to SCL score of 4) of the different regimens were then analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received propofol, 38 received ketamine, and 14 received fentanyl/versed. The mean times to sedation (minutes) were: propofol 4.5 (95% CI: 3.3–5.7), ketamine 10.6 (95% CI: 5.8–15.4), fentanyl/versed 11.5 (95% CI: 3.5–19.4). The mean times to recovery were: propofol 21.6 (95% CI: 16.1–27.1), ketamine 55.4 (95% CI: 46.2–64.5), fentanyl/versed 59.9 (95% CI: 20.3–99.5). Propofol had a statistically significant shorter time to sedation than both ketamine (p<.001) and fentanyl/versed (p=.022). Propofol also produced shorter recovery times than both ketamine (p<.001) and fentanyl/versed (p=.002). CONCLUSION: In this study, sedation and recovery times were shorter with propofol than with ketamine or fentanyl/versed. The use of propofol for conscious sedation in this non-randomized study was associated with a shorter ED length of stay. California Chapter of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC2872520/ /pubmed/20505814 Text en Copyright © 2006 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gorchynski, Julie
Wang, Scott
Anderson, Craig
Montano, Jara
Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title_full Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title_fullStr Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title_full_unstemmed Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title_short Conscious Sedation and Emergency Department Length of Stay: A Comparison of Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl/Versed
title_sort conscious sedation and emergency department length of stay: a comparison of propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl/versed
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2872520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505814
work_keys_str_mv AT gorchynskijulie conscioussedationandemergencydepartmentlengthofstayacomparisonofpropofolketamineandfentanylversed
AT wangscott conscioussedationandemergencydepartmentlengthofstayacomparisonofpropofolketamineandfentanylversed
AT andersoncraig conscioussedationandemergencydepartmentlengthofstayacomparisonofpropofolketamineandfentanylversed
AT montanojara conscioussedationandemergencydepartmentlengthofstayacomparisonofpropofolketamineandfentanylversed