Cargando…

Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles

BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coletta, Alain, Pinney, John W, Solís, David Y Weiss, Marsh, James, Pettifer, Steve R, Attwood, Teresa K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43
_version_ 1782181312490110976
author Coletta, Alain
Pinney, John W
Solís, David Y Weiss
Marsh, James
Pettifer, Steve R
Attwood, Teresa K
author_facet Coletta, Alain
Pinney, John W
Solís, David Y Weiss
Marsh, James
Pettifer, Steve R
Attwood, Teresa K
author_sort Coletta, Alain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from which they arise lends them remarkable degrees of compositional plasticity. They have therefore proved difficult to compare using conventional sequence analysis techniques, and functions remain to be elucidated for most of them. Here we undertake a systematic investigation of LCRs in order to explore their possible functional significance, placed in the particular context of Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks and Gene Ontology (GO)-term analysis. RESULTS: In keeping with previous results, we found that LCR-containing proteins tend to have more binding partners across different PPI networks than proteins that have no LCRs. More specifically, our study suggests i) that LCRs are preferentially positioned towards the protein sequence extremities and, in contrast with centrally-located LCRs, such terminal LCRs show a correlation between their lengths and degrees of connectivity, and ii) that centrally-located LCRs are enriched with transcription-related GO terms, while terminal LCRs are enriched with translation and stress response-related terms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest not only that LCRs may be involved in flexible binding associated with specific functions, but also that their positions within a sequence may be important in determining both their binding properties and their biological roles.
format Text
id pubmed-2873317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28733172010-05-20 Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles Coletta, Alain Pinney, John W Solís, David Y Weiss Marsh, James Pettifer, Steve R Attwood, Teresa K BMC Syst Biol Research article BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from which they arise lends them remarkable degrees of compositional plasticity. They have therefore proved difficult to compare using conventional sequence analysis techniques, and functions remain to be elucidated for most of them. Here we undertake a systematic investigation of LCRs in order to explore their possible functional significance, placed in the particular context of Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks and Gene Ontology (GO)-term analysis. RESULTS: In keeping with previous results, we found that LCR-containing proteins tend to have more binding partners across different PPI networks than proteins that have no LCRs. More specifically, our study suggests i) that LCRs are preferentially positioned towards the protein sequence extremities and, in contrast with centrally-located LCRs, such terminal LCRs show a correlation between their lengths and degrees of connectivity, and ii) that centrally-located LCRs are enriched with transcription-related GO terms, while terminal LCRs are enriched with translation and stress response-related terms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest not only that LCRs may be involved in flexible binding associated with specific functions, but also that their positions within a sequence may be important in determining both their binding properties and their biological roles. BioMed Central 2010-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2873317/ /pubmed/20385029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43 Text en Copyright ©2010 Coletta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Coletta, Alain
Pinney, John W
Solís, David Y Weiss
Marsh, James
Pettifer, Steve R
Attwood, Teresa K
Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title_full Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title_fullStr Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title_full_unstemmed Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title_short Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
title_sort low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43
work_keys_str_mv AT colettaalain lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles
AT pinneyjohnw lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles
AT solisdavidyweiss lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles
AT marshjames lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles
AT pettiferstever lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles
AT attwoodteresak lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles