Cargando…
Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles
BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from whi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43 |
_version_ | 1782181312490110976 |
---|---|
author | Coletta, Alain Pinney, John W Solís, David Y Weiss Marsh, James Pettifer, Steve R Attwood, Teresa K |
author_facet | Coletta, Alain Pinney, John W Solís, David Y Weiss Marsh, James Pettifer, Steve R Attwood, Teresa K |
author_sort | Coletta, Alain |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from which they arise lends them remarkable degrees of compositional plasticity. They have therefore proved difficult to compare using conventional sequence analysis techniques, and functions remain to be elucidated for most of them. Here we undertake a systematic investigation of LCRs in order to explore their possible functional significance, placed in the particular context of Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks and Gene Ontology (GO)-term analysis. RESULTS: In keeping with previous results, we found that LCR-containing proteins tend to have more binding partners across different PPI networks than proteins that have no LCRs. More specifically, our study suggests i) that LCRs are preferentially positioned towards the protein sequence extremities and, in contrast with centrally-located LCRs, such terminal LCRs show a correlation between their lengths and degrees of connectivity, and ii) that centrally-located LCRs are enriched with transcription-related GO terms, while terminal LCRs are enriched with translation and stress response-related terms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest not only that LCRs may be involved in flexible binding associated with specific functions, but also that their positions within a sequence may be important in determining both their binding properties and their biological roles. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2873317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28733172010-05-20 Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles Coletta, Alain Pinney, John W Solís, David Y Weiss Marsh, James Pettifer, Steve R Attwood, Teresa K BMC Syst Biol Research article BACKGROUND: Regions of protein sequences with biased amino acid composition (so-called Low-Complexity Regions (LCRs)) are abundant in the protein universe. A number of studies have revealed that i) these regions show significant divergence across protein families; ii) the genetic mechanisms from which they arise lends them remarkable degrees of compositional plasticity. They have therefore proved difficult to compare using conventional sequence analysis techniques, and functions remain to be elucidated for most of them. Here we undertake a systematic investigation of LCRs in order to explore their possible functional significance, placed in the particular context of Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks and Gene Ontology (GO)-term analysis. RESULTS: In keeping with previous results, we found that LCR-containing proteins tend to have more binding partners across different PPI networks than proteins that have no LCRs. More specifically, our study suggests i) that LCRs are preferentially positioned towards the protein sequence extremities and, in contrast with centrally-located LCRs, such terminal LCRs show a correlation between their lengths and degrees of connectivity, and ii) that centrally-located LCRs are enriched with transcription-related GO terms, while terminal LCRs are enriched with translation and stress response-related terms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest not only that LCRs may be involved in flexible binding associated with specific functions, but also that their positions within a sequence may be important in determining both their binding properties and their biological roles. BioMed Central 2010-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2873317/ /pubmed/20385029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43 Text en Copyright ©2010 Coletta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Coletta, Alain Pinney, John W Solís, David Y Weiss Marsh, James Pettifer, Steve R Attwood, Teresa K Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title | Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title_full | Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title_fullStr | Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title_short | Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
title_sort | low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-43 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colettaalain lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles AT pinneyjohnw lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles AT solisdavidyweiss lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles AT marshjames lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles AT pettiferstever lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles AT attwoodteresak lowcomplexityregionswithinproteinsequenceshavepositiondependentroles |