Cargando…
Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Moxibustion is a traditional Chinese method that uses the heat generated by burning herbal preparations containing Artemisia vulgaris to stimulate acupuncture points. Considering moxibustion is closely related to acupuncture, it seems pertinent to evaluate the effectiveness of moxibustio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20374659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-130 |
_version_ | 1782181327160737792 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Myeong Soo Choi, Tae-Young Park, Ji-Eun Lee, Song-Shil Ernst, Edzard |
author_facet | Lee, Myeong Soo Choi, Tae-Young Park, Ji-Eun Lee, Song-Shil Ernst, Edzard |
author_sort | Lee, Myeong Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Moxibustion is a traditional Chinese method that uses the heat generated by burning herbal preparations containing Artemisia vulgaris to stimulate acupuncture points. Considering moxibustion is closely related to acupuncture, it seems pertinent to evaluate the effectiveness of moxibustion as a treatment of symptoms of cancer. The objective of this review was to systematically assess the effectiveness of moxibustion for supportive cancer care. METHODS: We searched the literature using 11 databases from their inceptions to February 2010, without language restrictions. We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in which moxibustion was employed as an adjuvant treatment for conventional medicine in patients with any type of cancer. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validations were performed independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: Five RCTs compared the effects of moxibustion with conventional therapy. Four RCTs failed to show favourable effects of moxibustion for response rate compared with chemotherapy (n = 229, RR, 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15, P = 0.43). Two RCTs assessed the occurrence of side effects of chemotherapy and showed favourable effects of moxibustion. A meta-analysis showed significant less frequency of nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy for moxibustion group (n = 80, RR, 0.38, 95% CIs 0.22 to 0.65, P = 0.0005, heterogeneity: χ(2 )= 0.18, P = 0.67, I(2 )= 0%). CONCLUSION: The evidence is limited to suggest moxibustion is an effective supportive cancer care in nausea and vomiting. However, all studies have a high risk of bias so effectively there is not enough evidence to draw any conclusion. Further research is required to investigate whether there are specific benefits of moxibustion for supportive cancer care. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2873382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28733822010-05-20 Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Myeong Soo Choi, Tae-Young Park, Ji-Eun Lee, Song-Shil Ernst, Edzard BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Moxibustion is a traditional Chinese method that uses the heat generated by burning herbal preparations containing Artemisia vulgaris to stimulate acupuncture points. Considering moxibustion is closely related to acupuncture, it seems pertinent to evaluate the effectiveness of moxibustion as a treatment of symptoms of cancer. The objective of this review was to systematically assess the effectiveness of moxibustion for supportive cancer care. METHODS: We searched the literature using 11 databases from their inceptions to February 2010, without language restrictions. We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in which moxibustion was employed as an adjuvant treatment for conventional medicine in patients with any type of cancer. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validations were performed independently by two reviewers. RESULTS: Five RCTs compared the effects of moxibustion with conventional therapy. Four RCTs failed to show favourable effects of moxibustion for response rate compared with chemotherapy (n = 229, RR, 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.15, P = 0.43). Two RCTs assessed the occurrence of side effects of chemotherapy and showed favourable effects of moxibustion. A meta-analysis showed significant less frequency of nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy for moxibustion group (n = 80, RR, 0.38, 95% CIs 0.22 to 0.65, P = 0.0005, heterogeneity: χ(2 )= 0.18, P = 0.67, I(2 )= 0%). CONCLUSION: The evidence is limited to suggest moxibustion is an effective supportive cancer care in nausea and vomiting. However, all studies have a high risk of bias so effectively there is not enough evidence to draw any conclusion. Further research is required to investigate whether there are specific benefits of moxibustion for supportive cancer care. BioMed Central 2010-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2873382/ /pubmed/20374659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-130 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Myeong Soo Choi, Tae-Young Park, Ji-Eun Lee, Song-Shil Ernst, Edzard Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | moxibustion for cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20374659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemyeongsoo moxibustionforcancercareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choitaeyoung moxibustionforcancercareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parkjieun moxibustionforcancercareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leesongshil moxibustionforcancercareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ernstedzard moxibustionforcancercareasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |