Cargando…
Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005
BACKGROUND: Sexual transmitted infections (STIs) have increased in Germany and other countries in Europe since the mid-nineties. To obtain a better picture of diagnostic methods used in STI testing institutions in Germany, we performed a nationwide survey amongst STI specialists in order to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-98 |
_version_ | 1782181369001017344 |
---|---|
author | Gilsdorf, Andreas Hofmann, Alexandra Hamouda, Osamah Bremer, Viviane |
author_facet | Gilsdorf, Andreas Hofmann, Alexandra Hamouda, Osamah Bremer, Viviane |
author_sort | Gilsdorf, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sexual transmitted infections (STIs) have increased in Germany and other countries in Europe since the mid-nineties. To obtain a better picture of diagnostic methods used in STI testing institutions in Germany, we performed a nationwide survey amongst STI specialists in order to evaluate the quality of STI reports and provide recommendations to harmonize and possibly improve STI diagnostics in Germany. METHODS: We asked sentinel physicians and randomly chosen gynaecologists, urologists and dermato-venerologists, about the diagnostic methods used in 2005 to diagnose HIV, chlamydia (CT), gonorrhoea (GO) and syphilis (SY) in a national cross-sectional survey in order to recognize potential problems and provide recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 739/2287 (32%) physicians participated. Of all participants, 80% offered tests for HIV, 84% for CT, 83% for GO and 83% for SY. Of all participants who performed HIV testing, 90% requested an antibody test, 3% a rapid test and 1% a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). For CT testing, NAAT was used in 33% and rapid tests in 34% of participants. GO resistance testing was performed by 31% of the participants. SY testing was performed in 98% by serology. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic methods for STI vary highly among the participants. Diagnostic guidelines should be reviewed and harmonised to ensure consistent use of the optimal STI diagnostic methods. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2873557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28735572010-05-20 Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 Gilsdorf, Andreas Hofmann, Alexandra Hamouda, Osamah Bremer, Viviane BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Sexual transmitted infections (STIs) have increased in Germany and other countries in Europe since the mid-nineties. To obtain a better picture of diagnostic methods used in STI testing institutions in Germany, we performed a nationwide survey amongst STI specialists in order to evaluate the quality of STI reports and provide recommendations to harmonize and possibly improve STI diagnostics in Germany. METHODS: We asked sentinel physicians and randomly chosen gynaecologists, urologists and dermato-venerologists, about the diagnostic methods used in 2005 to diagnose HIV, chlamydia (CT), gonorrhoea (GO) and syphilis (SY) in a national cross-sectional survey in order to recognize potential problems and provide recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 739/2287 (32%) physicians participated. Of all participants, 80% offered tests for HIV, 84% for CT, 83% for GO and 83% for SY. Of all participants who performed HIV testing, 90% requested an antibody test, 3% a rapid test and 1% a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). For CT testing, NAAT was used in 33% and rapid tests in 34% of participants. GO resistance testing was performed by 31% of the participants. SY testing was performed in 98% by serology. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic methods for STI vary highly among the participants. Diagnostic guidelines should be reviewed and harmonised to ensure consistent use of the optimal STI diagnostic methods. BioMed Central 2010-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2873557/ /pubmed/20403184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-98 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gilsdorf et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gilsdorf, Andreas Hofmann, Alexandra Hamouda, Osamah Bremer, Viviane Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title | Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title_full | Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title_fullStr | Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title_full_unstemmed | Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title_short | Highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, Germany 2005 |
title_sort | highly variable use of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infections-results of a nationwide survey, germany 2005 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gilsdorfandreas highlyvariableuseofdiagnosticmethodsforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsresultsofanationwidesurveygermany2005 AT hofmannalexandra highlyvariableuseofdiagnosticmethodsforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsresultsofanationwidesurveygermany2005 AT hamoudaosamah highlyvariableuseofdiagnosticmethodsforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsresultsofanationwidesurveygermany2005 AT bremerviviane highlyvariableuseofdiagnosticmethodsforsexuallytransmittedinfectionsresultsofanationwidesurveygermany2005 |