Cargando…

Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia

AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emarah, Ahmed M, El-Helw, Mostafa A, Yassin, Hazem M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505837
_version_ 1782181447181795328
author Emarah, Ahmed M
El-Helw, Mostafa A
Yassin, Hazem M
author_facet Emarah, Ahmed M
El-Helw, Mostafa A
Yassin, Hazem M
author_sort Emarah, Ahmed M
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was −0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources.
format Text
id pubmed-2874272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28742722010-05-26 Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia Emarah, Ahmed M El-Helw, Mostafa A Yassin, Hazem M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was −0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2874272/ /pubmed/20505837 Text en © 2010 Emarah et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Emarah, Ahmed M
El-Helw, Mostafa A
Yassin, Hazem M
Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_full Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_fullStr Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_short Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_sort comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505837
work_keys_str_mv AT emarahahmedm comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia
AT elhelwmostafaa comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia
AT yassinhazemm comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia