Cargando…
Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised pat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505837 |
_version_ | 1782181447181795328 |
---|---|
author | Emarah, Ahmed M El-Helw, Mostafa A Yassin, Hazem M |
author_facet | Emarah, Ahmed M El-Helw, Mostafa A Yassin, Hazem M |
author_sort | Emarah, Ahmed M |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was −0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2874272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28742722010-05-26 Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia Emarah, Ahmed M El-Helw, Mostafa A Yassin, Hazem M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was −0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2874272/ /pubmed/20505837 Text en © 2010 Emarah et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Emarah, Ahmed M El-Helw, Mostafa A Yassin, Hazem M Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title | Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title_full | Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title_short | Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
title_sort | comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20505837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emarahahmedm comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia AT elhelwmostafaa comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia AT yassinhazemm comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia |