Cargando…

An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection

In any metabolomics experiment, robustness and reproducibility of data collection is of vital importance. These become more important in collaborative studies where data is to be collected on multiple instruments. With minimisation of variance in sample preparation and instrument performance it is p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Jane L., Baker, John M., Miller, Sonia J., Deborde, Catherine, Maucourt, Mickael, Biais, Benoit, Rolin, Dominique, Moing, Annick, Moco, Sofia, Vervoort, Jacques, Lommen, Arjen, Schäfer, Hartmut, Humpfer, Eberhard, Beale, Michael H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20526352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0200-4
_version_ 1782181482106716160
author Ward, Jane L.
Baker, John M.
Miller, Sonia J.
Deborde, Catherine
Maucourt, Mickael
Biais, Benoit
Rolin, Dominique
Moing, Annick
Moco, Sofia
Vervoort, Jacques
Lommen, Arjen
Schäfer, Hartmut
Humpfer, Eberhard
Beale, Michael H.
author_facet Ward, Jane L.
Baker, John M.
Miller, Sonia J.
Deborde, Catherine
Maucourt, Mickael
Biais, Benoit
Rolin, Dominique
Moing, Annick
Moco, Sofia
Vervoort, Jacques
Lommen, Arjen
Schäfer, Hartmut
Humpfer, Eberhard
Beale, Michael H.
author_sort Ward, Jane L.
collection PubMed
description In any metabolomics experiment, robustness and reproducibility of data collection is of vital importance. These become more important in collaborative studies where data is to be collected on multiple instruments. With minimisation of variance in sample preparation and instrument performance it is possible to elucidate even subtle differences in metabolite fingerprints due to genotype or biological treatment. In this paper we report on an inter laboratory comparison of plant derived samples by [(1)H]-NMR spectroscopy across five different sites and within those sites utilising instruments with different probes and magnetic field strengths of 9.4 T (400 MHz), 11.7 T (500 MHz) and 14.1 T (600 MHz). Whilst the focus of the study is on consistent data collection across laboratories, aspects of sample stability and the requirement for sample rotation within the NMR magnet are also discussed. Comparability of the datasets from participating laboratories was exceptionally good and the data were amenable to comparative analysis by multivariate statistics. Field strength differences can be adjusted for in the data pre-processing and multivariate analysis demonstrating that [(1)H]-NMR fingerprinting is the ideal technique for large scale plant metabolomics data collection requiring the participation of multiple laboratories.
format Text
id pubmed-2874487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28744872010-06-04 An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection Ward, Jane L. Baker, John M. Miller, Sonia J. Deborde, Catherine Maucourt, Mickael Biais, Benoit Rolin, Dominique Moing, Annick Moco, Sofia Vervoort, Jacques Lommen, Arjen Schäfer, Hartmut Humpfer, Eberhard Beale, Michael H. Metabolomics Original Paper In any metabolomics experiment, robustness and reproducibility of data collection is of vital importance. These become more important in collaborative studies where data is to be collected on multiple instruments. With minimisation of variance in sample preparation and instrument performance it is possible to elucidate even subtle differences in metabolite fingerprints due to genotype or biological treatment. In this paper we report on an inter laboratory comparison of plant derived samples by [(1)H]-NMR spectroscopy across five different sites and within those sites utilising instruments with different probes and magnetic field strengths of 9.4 T (400 MHz), 11.7 T (500 MHz) and 14.1 T (600 MHz). Whilst the focus of the study is on consistent data collection across laboratories, aspects of sample stability and the requirement for sample rotation within the NMR magnet are also discussed. Comparability of the datasets from participating laboratories was exceptionally good and the data were amenable to comparative analysis by multivariate statistics. Field strength differences can be adjusted for in the data pre-processing and multivariate analysis demonstrating that [(1)H]-NMR fingerprinting is the ideal technique for large scale plant metabolomics data collection requiring the participation of multiple laboratories. Springer US 2010-02-27 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2874487/ /pubmed/20526352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0200-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ward, Jane L.
Baker, John M.
Miller, Sonia J.
Deborde, Catherine
Maucourt, Mickael
Biais, Benoit
Rolin, Dominique
Moing, Annick
Moco, Sofia
Vervoort, Jacques
Lommen, Arjen
Schäfer, Hartmut
Humpfer, Eberhard
Beale, Michael H.
An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title_full An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title_fullStr An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title_full_unstemmed An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title_short An inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)H]-NMR metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
title_sort inter-laboratory comparison demonstrates that [(1)h]-nmr metabolite fingerprinting is a robust technique for collaborative plant metabolomic data collection
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20526352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-010-0200-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wardjanel aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT bakerjohnm aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT millersoniaj aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT debordecatherine aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT maucourtmickael aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT biaisbenoit aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT rolindominique aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT moingannick aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT mocosofia aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT vervoortjacques aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT lommenarjen aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT schaferhartmut aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT humpfereberhard aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT bealemichaelh aninterlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT wardjanel interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT bakerjohnm interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT millersoniaj interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT debordecatherine interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT maucourtmickael interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT biaisbenoit interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT rolindominique interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT moingannick interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT mocosofia interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT vervoortjacques interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT lommenarjen interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT schaferhartmut interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT humpfereberhard interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection
AT bealemichaelh interlaboratorycomparisondemonstratesthat1hnmrmetabolitefingerprintingisarobusttechniqueforcollaborativeplantmetabolomicdatacollection