Cargando…

Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edgell, Tracey, Martin-Roussety, G., Barker, G., Autelitano, D. J., Allen, D., Grant, P., Rice, G. E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20082099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5
_version_ 1782181483195138048
author Edgell, Tracey
Martin-Roussety, G.
Barker, G.
Autelitano, D. J.
Allen, D.
Grant, P.
Rice, G. E.
author_facet Edgell, Tracey
Martin-Roussety, G.
Barker, G.
Autelitano, D. J.
Allen, D.
Grant, P.
Rice, G. E.
author_sort Edgell, Tracey
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone. METHODS: A retrospective, case–control study (phase II biomarker trial) was conducted that involved 362 plasma samples obtained from women with ovarian cancer (n = 150) and healthy controls (n = 212). A multivariate classification model was developed that incorporated five biomarkers of ovarian cancer, CA-125; C-reactive protein (CRP); serum amyloid A (SAA); interleukin 6 (IL-6); and interleukin 8 (IL-8) from a modelling cohort (n = 179). The performance of the model was evaluated using an independent validation cohort (n = 183) and compared with of CA-125 alone. RESULTS: The AUC for the biomarker panel was significantly greater than the AUC for CA-125 alone for a validation cohort (p < 0.01) and an early stage disease cohort (i.e. Stages I and II; p < 0.01). At a threshold of 0.3, the sensitivity and specificity of the multianalyte panel were 94.1 and 91.3%, respectively, for the validation cohort and 92.3 and 91.3%, respectively for an early stage disease cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a panel of plasma biomarkers for the identification of women with ovarian cancer delivers a significant increase in diagnostic performance when compared to the performance of CA-125 alone.
format Text
id pubmed-2874491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28744912010-06-04 Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer Edgell, Tracey Martin-Roussety, G. Barker, G. Autelitano, D. J. Allen, D. Grant, P. Rice, G. E. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Paper PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone. METHODS: A retrospective, case–control study (phase II biomarker trial) was conducted that involved 362 plasma samples obtained from women with ovarian cancer (n = 150) and healthy controls (n = 212). A multivariate classification model was developed that incorporated five biomarkers of ovarian cancer, CA-125; C-reactive protein (CRP); serum amyloid A (SAA); interleukin 6 (IL-6); and interleukin 8 (IL-8) from a modelling cohort (n = 179). The performance of the model was evaluated using an independent validation cohort (n = 183) and compared with of CA-125 alone. RESULTS: The AUC for the biomarker panel was significantly greater than the AUC for CA-125 alone for a validation cohort (p < 0.01) and an early stage disease cohort (i.e. Stages I and II; p < 0.01). At a threshold of 0.3, the sensitivity and specificity of the multianalyte panel were 94.1 and 91.3%, respectively, for the validation cohort and 92.3 and 91.3%, respectively for an early stage disease cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a panel of plasma biomarkers for the identification of women with ovarian cancer delivers a significant increase in diagnostic performance when compared to the performance of CA-125 alone. Springer-Verlag 2010-01-16 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2874491/ /pubmed/20082099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Edgell, Tracey
Martin-Roussety, G.
Barker, G.
Autelitano, D. J.
Allen, D.
Grant, P.
Rice, G. E.
Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title_full Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title_short Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
title_sort phase ii biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20082099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5
work_keys_str_mv AT edgelltracey phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT martinroussetyg phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT barkerg phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT autelitanodj phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT allend phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT grantp phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer
AT ricege phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer