Cargando…
Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer
PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20082099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5 |
_version_ | 1782181483195138048 |
---|---|
author | Edgell, Tracey Martin-Roussety, G. Barker, G. Autelitano, D. J. Allen, D. Grant, P. Rice, G. E. |
author_facet | Edgell, Tracey Martin-Roussety, G. Barker, G. Autelitano, D. J. Allen, D. Grant, P. Rice, G. E. |
author_sort | Edgell, Tracey |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone. METHODS: A retrospective, case–control study (phase II biomarker trial) was conducted that involved 362 plasma samples obtained from women with ovarian cancer (n = 150) and healthy controls (n = 212). A multivariate classification model was developed that incorporated five biomarkers of ovarian cancer, CA-125; C-reactive protein (CRP); serum amyloid A (SAA); interleukin 6 (IL-6); and interleukin 8 (IL-8) from a modelling cohort (n = 179). The performance of the model was evaluated using an independent validation cohort (n = 183) and compared with of CA-125 alone. RESULTS: The AUC for the biomarker panel was significantly greater than the AUC for CA-125 alone for a validation cohort (p < 0.01) and an early stage disease cohort (i.e. Stages I and II; p < 0.01). At a threshold of 0.3, the sensitivity and specificity of the multianalyte panel were 94.1 and 91.3%, respectively, for the validation cohort and 92.3 and 91.3%, respectively for an early stage disease cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a panel of plasma biomarkers for the identification of women with ovarian cancer delivers a significant increase in diagnostic performance when compared to the performance of CA-125 alone. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2874491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28744912010-06-04 Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer Edgell, Tracey Martin-Roussety, G. Barker, G. Autelitano, D. J. Allen, D. Grant, P. Rice, G. E. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Paper PURPOSE: The primary hypothesis to be tested in this study was that the diagnostic performance (as assessed by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC) of a multianalyte panel to correctly identify women with ovarian cancer was significantly greater than that for CA-125 alone. METHODS: A retrospective, case–control study (phase II biomarker trial) was conducted that involved 362 plasma samples obtained from women with ovarian cancer (n = 150) and healthy controls (n = 212). A multivariate classification model was developed that incorporated five biomarkers of ovarian cancer, CA-125; C-reactive protein (CRP); serum amyloid A (SAA); interleukin 6 (IL-6); and interleukin 8 (IL-8) from a modelling cohort (n = 179). The performance of the model was evaluated using an independent validation cohort (n = 183) and compared with of CA-125 alone. RESULTS: The AUC for the biomarker panel was significantly greater than the AUC for CA-125 alone for a validation cohort (p < 0.01) and an early stage disease cohort (i.e. Stages I and II; p < 0.01). At a threshold of 0.3, the sensitivity and specificity of the multianalyte panel were 94.1 and 91.3%, respectively, for the validation cohort and 92.3 and 91.3%, respectively for an early stage disease cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a panel of plasma biomarkers for the identification of women with ovarian cancer delivers a significant increase in diagnostic performance when compared to the performance of CA-125 alone. Springer-Verlag 2010-01-16 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2874491/ /pubmed/20082099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Edgell, Tracey Martin-Roussety, G. Barker, G. Autelitano, D. J. Allen, D. Grant, P. Rice, G. E. Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title | Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title_full | Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title_fullStr | Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title_short | Phase II biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
title_sort | phase ii biomarker trial of a multimarker diagnostic for ovarian cancer |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20082099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0755-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edgelltracey phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT martinroussetyg phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT barkerg phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT autelitanodj phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT allend phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT grantp phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer AT ricege phaseiibiomarkertrialofamultimarkerdiagnosticforovariancancer |