Cargando…
SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32 |
_version_ | 1782181510318653440 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Larissa M Ma, Xin Boyko, Adam R Bustamante, Carlos D Oleksiak, Marjorie F |
author_facet | Williams, Larissa M Ma, Xin Boyko, Adam R Bustamante, Carlos D Oleksiak, Marjorie F |
author_sort | Williams, Larissa M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping for population genetics in natural populations of the teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus as well as closely related Fundulus species (F. grandis, F. majalis and F. similis). RESULTS: We used 454 pyrosequencing and MassARRAY genotyping technology to identify and type 458 genome-wide SNPs and determine genetic differentiation within and between populations and species of Fundulus. Specifically, pyrosequencing identified 96 putative SNPs across coding and non-coding regions of the F. heteroclitus genome: 88.8% were verified as true SNPs with MassARRAY. Additionally, putative SNPs identified in F. heteroclitus EST sequences were verified in most (86.5%) F. heteroclitus individuals; fewer were genotyped in F. grandis (74.4%), F. majalis (72.9%), and F. similis (60.7%) individuals. SNPs were polymorphic and showed latitudinal clinal variation separating northern and southern populations and established isolation by distance in F. heteroclitus populations. In F. grandis, SNPs were less polymorphic but still established isolation by distance. Markers differentiated species and populations. CONCLUSIONS: In total, these approaches were used to quickly determine differences within the Fundulus genome and provide markers for population genetic studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2874759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28747592010-05-24 SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus Williams, Larissa M Ma, Xin Boyko, Adam R Bustamante, Carlos D Oleksiak, Marjorie F BMC Genet Research article BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping for population genetics in natural populations of the teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus as well as closely related Fundulus species (F. grandis, F. majalis and F. similis). RESULTS: We used 454 pyrosequencing and MassARRAY genotyping technology to identify and type 458 genome-wide SNPs and determine genetic differentiation within and between populations and species of Fundulus. Specifically, pyrosequencing identified 96 putative SNPs across coding and non-coding regions of the F. heteroclitus genome: 88.8% were verified as true SNPs with MassARRAY. Additionally, putative SNPs identified in F. heteroclitus EST sequences were verified in most (86.5%) F. heteroclitus individuals; fewer were genotyped in F. grandis (74.4%), F. majalis (72.9%), and F. similis (60.7%) individuals. SNPs were polymorphic and showed latitudinal clinal variation separating northern and southern populations and established isolation by distance in F. heteroclitus populations. In F. grandis, SNPs were less polymorphic but still established isolation by distance. Markers differentiated species and populations. CONCLUSIONS: In total, these approaches were used to quickly determine differences within the Fundulus genome and provide markers for population genetic studies. BioMed Central 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2874759/ /pubmed/20433726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Williams, Larissa M Ma, Xin Boyko, Adam R Bustamante, Carlos D Oleksiak, Marjorie F SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title | SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title_full | SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title_fullStr | SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title_full_unstemmed | SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title_short | SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
title_sort | snp identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamslarissam snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus AT maxin snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus AT boykoadamr snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus AT bustamantecarlosd snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus AT oleksiakmarjorief snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus |