Cargando…

SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus

BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Larissa M, Ma, Xin, Boyko, Adam R, Bustamante, Carlos D, Oleksiak, Marjorie F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32
_version_ 1782181510318653440
author Williams, Larissa M
Ma, Xin
Boyko, Adam R
Bustamante, Carlos D
Oleksiak, Marjorie F
author_facet Williams, Larissa M
Ma, Xin
Boyko, Adam R
Bustamante, Carlos D
Oleksiak, Marjorie F
author_sort Williams, Larissa M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping for population genetics in natural populations of the teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus as well as closely related Fundulus species (F. grandis, F. majalis and F. similis). RESULTS: We used 454 pyrosequencing and MassARRAY genotyping technology to identify and type 458 genome-wide SNPs and determine genetic differentiation within and between populations and species of Fundulus. Specifically, pyrosequencing identified 96 putative SNPs across coding and non-coding regions of the F. heteroclitus genome: 88.8% were verified as true SNPs with MassARRAY. Additionally, putative SNPs identified in F. heteroclitus EST sequences were verified in most (86.5%) F. heteroclitus individuals; fewer were genotyped in F. grandis (74.4%), F. majalis (72.9%), and F. similis (60.7%) individuals. SNPs were polymorphic and showed latitudinal clinal variation separating northern and southern populations and established isolation by distance in F. heteroclitus populations. In F. grandis, SNPs were less polymorphic but still established isolation by distance. Markers differentiated species and populations. CONCLUSIONS: In total, these approaches were used to quickly determine differences within the Fundulus genome and provide markers for population genetic studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2874759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28747592010-05-24 SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus Williams, Larissa M Ma, Xin Boyko, Adam R Bustamante, Carlos D Oleksiak, Marjorie F BMC Genet Research article BACKGROUND: By targeting SNPs contained in both coding and non-coding areas of the genome, we are able to identify genetic differences and characterize genome-wide patterns of variation among individuals, populations and species. We investigated the utility of 454 sequencing and MassARRAY genotyping for population genetics in natural populations of the teleost, Fundulus heteroclitus as well as closely related Fundulus species (F. grandis, F. majalis and F. similis). RESULTS: We used 454 pyrosequencing and MassARRAY genotyping technology to identify and type 458 genome-wide SNPs and determine genetic differentiation within and between populations and species of Fundulus. Specifically, pyrosequencing identified 96 putative SNPs across coding and non-coding regions of the F. heteroclitus genome: 88.8% were verified as true SNPs with MassARRAY. Additionally, putative SNPs identified in F. heteroclitus EST sequences were verified in most (86.5%) F. heteroclitus individuals; fewer were genotyped in F. grandis (74.4%), F. majalis (72.9%), and F. similis (60.7%) individuals. SNPs were polymorphic and showed latitudinal clinal variation separating northern and southern populations and established isolation by distance in F. heteroclitus populations. In F. grandis, SNPs were less polymorphic but still established isolation by distance. Markers differentiated species and populations. CONCLUSIONS: In total, these approaches were used to quickly determine differences within the Fundulus genome and provide markers for population genetic studies. BioMed Central 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2874759/ /pubmed/20433726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32 Text en Copyright ©2010 Williams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Williams, Larissa M
Ma, Xin
Boyko, Adam R
Bustamante, Carlos D
Oleksiak, Marjorie F
SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title_full SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title_fullStr SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title_full_unstemmed SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title_short SNP identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
title_sort snp identification, verification, and utility for population genetics in a non-model genus
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2874759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-32
work_keys_str_mv AT williamslarissam snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus
AT maxin snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus
AT boykoadamr snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus
AT bustamantecarlosd snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus
AT oleksiakmarjorief snpidentificationverificationandutilityforpopulationgeneticsinanonmodelgenus