Cargando…

Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The cost of time spent on exercise is an important factor in societal-perspective health economic analyses of interventions aimed at promoting physical activity. However, there are no existing measuring methods for estimating time costs. The aim of this article is to describe a way to me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagberg, Lars Axel, Lindholm, Lars
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-9
_version_ 1782181550192852992
author Hagberg, Lars Axel
Lindholm, Lars
author_facet Hagberg, Lars Axel
Lindholm, Lars
author_sort Hagberg, Lars Axel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cost of time spent on exercise is an important factor in societal-perspective health economic analyses of interventions aimed at promoting physical activity. However, there are no existing measuring methods for estimating time costs. The aim of this article is to describe a way to measure the costs of time spent on physical activity. We propose a model for measuring these time costs, and present the results of a pilot study applying this model to different groups of exercisers. METHODS: We began this investigation by developing a model for measuring the time spent on exercise, based on the most important theoretical frameworks for valuing time. In the model, the value of utility in anticipation (expected health benefits) of performing exercise is expressed in terms of health-related quality of life. With this approach, the cost of the time spent on exercise is defined as the value of utility in use of leisure activity forgone minus the value of utility in use of exercise. Utility in use for exercise is valued in comparison with utility in use for leisure activity forgone and utility in use for work. To put the model into practice, we developed a questionnaire with the aim of investigating the valuations made by exercisers, and applied this questionnaire among more experienced and less experienced exercisers. RESULTS: Less experienced exercisers valued the time spent on exercise as being equal to 26% of net wages, while more experienced exercisers valued this time at 7% of net wages (p < 0.001). The higher time costs seen among the less experienced exercisers correlated to a less positive experience of exercise and a more positive experience of the lost leisure activity. There was a significant inverse correlation between the costs of time spent on exercise, and the frequency and duration of regular exercise. CONCLUSION: The time spent on exercise is an important factor in interventions aimed at promoting physical activity, and should be taken into consideration in cost-effectiveness analyses. The proposed model for measuring the costs of the time spent on exercise seems to be a better method than the previously-used assumptions of time costs.
format Text
id pubmed-2875204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28752042010-05-25 Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study Hagberg, Lars Axel Lindholm, Lars Cost Eff Resour Alloc Methodology BACKGROUND: The cost of time spent on exercise is an important factor in societal-perspective health economic analyses of interventions aimed at promoting physical activity. However, there are no existing measuring methods for estimating time costs. The aim of this article is to describe a way to measure the costs of time spent on physical activity. We propose a model for measuring these time costs, and present the results of a pilot study applying this model to different groups of exercisers. METHODS: We began this investigation by developing a model for measuring the time spent on exercise, based on the most important theoretical frameworks for valuing time. In the model, the value of utility in anticipation (expected health benefits) of performing exercise is expressed in terms of health-related quality of life. With this approach, the cost of the time spent on exercise is defined as the value of utility in use of leisure activity forgone minus the value of utility in use of exercise. Utility in use for exercise is valued in comparison with utility in use for leisure activity forgone and utility in use for work. To put the model into practice, we developed a questionnaire with the aim of investigating the valuations made by exercisers, and applied this questionnaire among more experienced and less experienced exercisers. RESULTS: Less experienced exercisers valued the time spent on exercise as being equal to 26% of net wages, while more experienced exercisers valued this time at 7% of net wages (p < 0.001). The higher time costs seen among the less experienced exercisers correlated to a less positive experience of exercise and a more positive experience of the lost leisure activity. There was a significant inverse correlation between the costs of time spent on exercise, and the frequency and duration of regular exercise. CONCLUSION: The time spent on exercise is an important factor in interventions aimed at promoting physical activity, and should be taken into consideration in cost-effectiveness analyses. The proposed model for measuring the costs of the time spent on exercise seems to be a better method than the previously-used assumptions of time costs. BioMed Central 2010-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2875204/ /pubmed/20459761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-9 Text en Copyright ©2010 Hagberg and Lindholm; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Hagberg, Lars Axel
Lindholm, Lars
Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title_full Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title_fullStr Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title_short Measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
title_sort measuring the time costs of exercise: a proposed measuring method and a pilot study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-8-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hagberglarsaxel measuringthetimecostsofexerciseaproposedmeasuringmethodandapilotstudy
AT lindholmlars measuringthetimecostsofexerciseaproposedmeasuringmethodandapilotstudy