Cargando…
Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of an oral insulin (OI) formulation compared with subcutaneously injected regular human insulin (RHI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten male patients with type 2 diabetes (means ± SD; A1C 7.0 ± 1.1%; BMI 28.3 ± 2.7 kg/m(2)) r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20185734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1807 |
_version_ | 1782181573060198400 |
---|---|
author | Kapitza, Christoph Zijlstra, Eric Heinemann, Lutz Castelli, M. Cristina Riley, Gary Heise, Tim |
author_facet | Kapitza, Christoph Zijlstra, Eric Heinemann, Lutz Castelli, M. Cristina Riley, Gary Heise, Tim |
author_sort | Kapitza, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of an oral insulin (OI) formulation compared with subcutaneously injected regular human insulin (RHI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten male patients with type 2 diabetes (means ± SD; A1C 7.0 ± 1.1%; BMI 28.3 ± 2.7 kg/m(2)) received either 300 units of insulin combined with 400 mg of delivery agent orally or 15 units RHI subcutaneously under isoglycemic clamp conditions. RESULTS: Maximum insulin concentration was greater and onset of action was faster with OI (C(max) 93 ± 71 vs. 33 ± 11 μU/ml; AUC(GIR)((0−1h)) 173 ± 86 vs. 27 ± 32 mg/kg; P < 0.05). Mean insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate returned to baseline within 3 h after OI administration. Relative bioavailability of OI was 7 ± 4% (1st 2 h). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that absorption of OI is feasible under fasting conditions. OI has a fast onset and a short duration of action but also shows a rather high between-subject variability in absorption. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2875439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28754392011-06-01 Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Kapitza, Christoph Zijlstra, Eric Heinemann, Lutz Castelli, M. Cristina Riley, Gary Heise, Tim Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of an oral insulin (OI) formulation compared with subcutaneously injected regular human insulin (RHI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten male patients with type 2 diabetes (means ± SD; A1C 7.0 ± 1.1%; BMI 28.3 ± 2.7 kg/m(2)) received either 300 units of insulin combined with 400 mg of delivery agent orally or 15 units RHI subcutaneously under isoglycemic clamp conditions. RESULTS: Maximum insulin concentration was greater and onset of action was faster with OI (C(max) 93 ± 71 vs. 33 ± 11 μU/ml; AUC(GIR)((0−1h)) 173 ± 86 vs. 27 ± 32 mg/kg; P < 0.05). Mean insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate returned to baseline within 3 h after OI administration. Relative bioavailability of OI was 7 ± 4% (1st 2 h). CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that absorption of OI is feasible under fasting conditions. OI has a fast onset and a short duration of action but also shows a rather high between-subject variability in absorption. American Diabetes Association 2010-06 2010-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2875439/ /pubmed/20185734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1807 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kapitza, Christoph Zijlstra, Eric Heinemann, Lutz Castelli, M. Cristina Riley, Gary Heise, Tim Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title | Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_full | Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_short | Oral Insulin: A Comparison With Subcutaneous Regular Human Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_sort | oral insulin: a comparison with subcutaneous regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20185734 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kapitzachristoph oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes AT zijlstraeric oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes AT heinemannlutz oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes AT castellimcristina oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes AT rileygary oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes AT heisetim oralinsulinacomparisonwithsubcutaneousregularhumaninsulininpatientswithtype2diabetes |