Cargando…
Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load co...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9 |
_version_ | 1782181581343948800 |
---|---|
author | Baart, Martijn Vroomen, Jean |
author_facet | Baart, Martijn Vroomen, Jean |
author_sort | Baart, Martijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load conditions. Phonetic recalibration was—like selective speech adaptation—not affected by a concurrent verbal or visuospatial memory task. This result indicates that phonetic recalibration is a low-level process not critically depending on processes used in verbal- or visuospatial working memory. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2875474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28754742010-06-10 Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory Baart, Martijn Vroomen, Jean Exp Brain Res Research Article Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load conditions. Phonetic recalibration was—like selective speech adaptation—not affected by a concurrent verbal or visuospatial memory task. This result indicates that phonetic recalibration is a low-level process not critically depending on processes used in verbal- or visuospatial working memory. Springer-Verlag 2010-05-01 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2875474/ /pubmed/20437168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baart, Martijn Vroomen, Jean Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title | Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title_full | Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title_fullStr | Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title_full_unstemmed | Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title_short | Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
title_sort | phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baartmartijn phoneticrecalibrationdoesnotdependonworkingmemory AT vroomenjean phoneticrecalibrationdoesnotdependonworkingmemory |