Cargando…

Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory

Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baart, Martijn, Vroomen, Jean
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9
_version_ 1782181581343948800
author Baart, Martijn
Vroomen, Jean
author_facet Baart, Martijn
Vroomen, Jean
author_sort Baart, Martijn
collection PubMed
description Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load conditions. Phonetic recalibration was—like selective speech adaptation—not affected by a concurrent verbal or visuospatial memory task. This result indicates that phonetic recalibration is a low-level process not critically depending on processes used in verbal- or visuospatial working memory.
format Text
id pubmed-2875474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28754742010-06-10 Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory Baart, Martijn Vroomen, Jean Exp Brain Res Research Article Listeners use lipread information to adjust the phonetic boundary between two speech categories (phonetic recalibration, Bertelson et al. 2003). Here, we examined phonetic recalibration while listeners were engaged in a visuospatial or verbal memory working memory task under different memory load conditions. Phonetic recalibration was—like selective speech adaptation—not affected by a concurrent verbal or visuospatial memory task. This result indicates that phonetic recalibration is a low-level process not critically depending on processes used in verbal- or visuospatial working memory. Springer-Verlag 2010-05-01 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2875474/ /pubmed/20437168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baart, Martijn
Vroomen, Jean
Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title_full Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title_fullStr Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title_full_unstemmed Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title_short Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
title_sort phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20437168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2264-9
work_keys_str_mv AT baartmartijn phoneticrecalibrationdoesnotdependonworkingmemory
AT vroomenjean phoneticrecalibrationdoesnotdependonworkingmemory