Cargando…
Pro/con debate: Should antimicrobial stewardship programs be adopted universally in the intensive care unit?
You are director of a large multi-disciplinary ICU. You have recently read that hospital-wide antibiotic stewardship programs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of care, and to reduce the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms and overall costs. You are considering starting on...
Autores principales: | George, Philip, Morris, Andrew M |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20236505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8219 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/Con debate: Are barrier precautions cost-effective in improving patient outcomes in the intensive care unit?
por: Thampi, Nisha, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients
por: Schortgen, Frédérique, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Pro/Con debate: Should 24/7 in-house intensivist coverage be implemented?
por: Arabi, Yaseen
Publicado: (2008) -
Pro/con debate: Should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?
por: Downar, James, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate
por: Villegas, Maria Virginia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)