Cargando…
Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes
Modifying how intensive care units (ICUs) are organized and run offers major opportunities to improve outcomes. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Billington and colleagues assessed the association of outcomes with intensivists' base speciality. However, very little is known about the rela...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20156315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8843 |
_version_ | 1782181589856288768 |
---|---|
author | Garland, Allan |
author_facet | Garland, Allan |
author_sort | Garland, Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modifying how intensive care units (ICUs) are organized and run offers major opportunities to improve outcomes. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Billington and colleagues assessed the association of outcomes with intensivists' base speciality. However, very little is known about the relationships between ICU organization and outcomes. In the systems-based paradigm of quality improvement, every aspect of what we do and how we do it is a candidate for study and change. While we need much more rigorous research assessing every aspect of this large question, there are substantial barriers to conducting such studies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2875514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28755142011-01-27 Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes Garland, Allan Crit Care Commentary Modifying how intensive care units (ICUs) are organized and run offers major opportunities to improve outcomes. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Billington and colleagues assessed the association of outcomes with intensivists' base speciality. However, very little is known about the relationships between ICU organization and outcomes. In the systems-based paradigm of quality improvement, every aspect of what we do and how we do it is a candidate for study and change. While we need much more rigorous research assessing every aspect of this large question, there are substantial barriers to conducting such studies. BioMed Central 2010 2010-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2875514/ /pubmed/20156315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8843 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Garland, Allan Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title | Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title_full | Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title_short | Figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between ICU organization and outcomes |
title_sort | figuring out what works: a need for more and better studies on the relationship between icu organization and outcomes |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20156315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garlandallan figuringoutwhatworksaneedformoreandbetterstudiesontherelationshipbetweenicuorganizationandoutcomes |