Cargando…
PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860 |
_version_ | 1782181591276060672 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Zhanqi Steinmann, Daniel Frerichs, Inéz Guttmann, Josef Möller, Knut |
author_facet | Zhao, Zhanqi Steinmann, Daniel Frerichs, Inéz Guttmann, Josef Möller, Knut |
author_sort | Zhao, Zhanqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity using the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 10 anesthetized patients with healthy lungs mechanically ventilated under volume-controlled mode were investigated. Ventilation distribution was monitored by EIT. A standardized incremental PEEP trial (PEEP from 0 to 28 mbar, 2 mbar per step) was conducted. During the PEEP trial, "optimal" PEEP level for each patient was determined when the air was most homogeneously distributed in the lung, indicated by the lowest GI index value. Two published methods for setting PEEP were included for comparison based on the maximum global dynamic compliance and the intra-tidal compliance-volume curve. RESULTS: No significant differences in the results were observed between the GI index method (12.2 ± 4.6 mbar) and the dynamic compliance method (11.4 ± 2.3 mbar, P > 0.6), or between the GI index and the compliance-volume curve method (12.2 ± 4.9 mbar, P > 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, it is feasible and reasonable to use the GI index to select the PEEP level with respect to ventilation homogeneity. The GI index may provide new insights into the relationship between lung mechanics and tidal volume distribution and may be used to guide ventilator settings. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2875520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28755202010-05-26 PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography Zhao, Zhanqi Steinmann, Daniel Frerichs, Inéz Guttmann, Josef Möller, Knut Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity using the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 10 anesthetized patients with healthy lungs mechanically ventilated under volume-controlled mode were investigated. Ventilation distribution was monitored by EIT. A standardized incremental PEEP trial (PEEP from 0 to 28 mbar, 2 mbar per step) was conducted. During the PEEP trial, "optimal" PEEP level for each patient was determined when the air was most homogeneously distributed in the lung, indicated by the lowest GI index value. Two published methods for setting PEEP were included for comparison based on the maximum global dynamic compliance and the intra-tidal compliance-volume curve. RESULTS: No significant differences in the results were observed between the GI index method (12.2 ± 4.6 mbar) and the dynamic compliance method (11.4 ± 2.3 mbar, P > 0.6), or between the GI index and the compliance-volume curve method (12.2 ± 4.9 mbar, P > 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, it is feasible and reasonable to use the GI index to select the PEEP level with respect to ventilation homogeneity. The GI index may provide new insights into the relationship between lung mechanics and tidal volume distribution and may be used to guide ventilator settings. BioMed Central 2010 2010-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2875520/ /pubmed/20113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860 Text en Copyright ©2010 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhao, Zhanqi Steinmann, Daniel Frerichs, Inéz Guttmann, Josef Möller, Knut PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title | PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title_full | PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title_fullStr | PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title_short | PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
title_sort | peep titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaozhanqi peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography AT steinmanndaniel peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography AT frerichsinez peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography AT guttmannjosef peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography AT mollerknut peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography |