Cargando…

PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography

INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zhanqi, Steinmann, Daniel, Frerichs, Inéz, Guttmann, Josef, Möller, Knut
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860
_version_ 1782181591276060672
author Zhao, Zhanqi
Steinmann, Daniel
Frerichs, Inéz
Guttmann, Josef
Möller, Knut
author_facet Zhao, Zhanqi
Steinmann, Daniel
Frerichs, Inéz
Guttmann, Josef
Möller, Knut
author_sort Zhao, Zhanqi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity using the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 10 anesthetized patients with healthy lungs mechanically ventilated under volume-controlled mode were investigated. Ventilation distribution was monitored by EIT. A standardized incremental PEEP trial (PEEP from 0 to 28 mbar, 2 mbar per step) was conducted. During the PEEP trial, "optimal" PEEP level for each patient was determined when the air was most homogeneously distributed in the lung, indicated by the lowest GI index value. Two published methods for setting PEEP were included for comparison based on the maximum global dynamic compliance and the intra-tidal compliance-volume curve. RESULTS: No significant differences in the results were observed between the GI index method (12.2 ± 4.6 mbar) and the dynamic compliance method (11.4 ± 2.3 mbar, P > 0.6), or between the GI index and the compliance-volume curve method (12.2 ± 4.9 mbar, P > 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, it is feasible and reasonable to use the GI index to select the PEEP level with respect to ventilation homogeneity. The GI index may provide new insights into the relationship between lung mechanics and tidal volume distribution and may be used to guide ventilator settings.
format Text
id pubmed-2875520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28755202010-05-26 PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography Zhao, Zhanqi Steinmann, Daniel Frerichs, Inéz Guttmann, Josef Möller, Knut Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Lung protective ventilation requires low tidal volume and suitable positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To date, few methods have been accepted for clinical use to set the appropriate PEEP. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity using the global inhomogeneity (GI) index based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 10 anesthetized patients with healthy lungs mechanically ventilated under volume-controlled mode were investigated. Ventilation distribution was monitored by EIT. A standardized incremental PEEP trial (PEEP from 0 to 28 mbar, 2 mbar per step) was conducted. During the PEEP trial, "optimal" PEEP level for each patient was determined when the air was most homogeneously distributed in the lung, indicated by the lowest GI index value. Two published methods for setting PEEP were included for comparison based on the maximum global dynamic compliance and the intra-tidal compliance-volume curve. RESULTS: No significant differences in the results were observed between the GI index method (12.2 ± 4.6 mbar) and the dynamic compliance method (11.4 ± 2.3 mbar, P > 0.6), or between the GI index and the compliance-volume curve method (12.2 ± 4.9 mbar, P > 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, it is feasible and reasonable to use the GI index to select the PEEP level with respect to ventilation homogeneity. The GI index may provide new insights into the relationship between lung mechanics and tidal volume distribution and may be used to guide ventilator settings. BioMed Central 2010 2010-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2875520/ /pubmed/20113520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860 Text en Copyright ©2010 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Zhanqi
Steinmann, Daniel
Frerichs, Inéz
Guttmann, Josef
Möller, Knut
PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title_full PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title_fullStr PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title_full_unstemmed PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title_short PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
title_sort peep titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20113520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8860
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozhanqi peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography
AT steinmanndaniel peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography
AT frerichsinez peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography
AT guttmannjosef peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography
AT mollerknut peeptitrationguidedbyventilationhomogeneityafeasibilitystudyusingelectricalimpedancetomography