Cargando…

Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?

Clinical diagnostic accuracy using revised consensus criteria and newly developed biomarkers ranges from 65 to 96% for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with a diagnostic specificity versus other dementias of 23 to 88%. Neuropathological assessment using molecular biology and immunohistochemistry, homo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jellinger, Kurt A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20497615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt34
_version_ 1782181713585111040
author Jellinger, Kurt A
author_facet Jellinger, Kurt A
author_sort Jellinger, Kurt A
collection PubMed
description Clinical diagnostic accuracy using revised consensus criteria and newly developed biomarkers ranges from 65 to 96% for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with a diagnostic specificity versus other dementias of 23 to 88%. Neuropathological assessment using molecular biology and immunohistochemistry, homogeneous definitions, harmonized interlaboratory methods, and assessment standards can identify 54 to 97% of AD cases and can eliminate 62 to 100% of nondemented subjects, but only between 8 and 42% of non-AD dementias, without, however, being able to clarify the etiology of most of these disorders. The value and pitfalls of pathological diagnostic criteria are critically discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-2876788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28767882011-05-07 Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis? Jellinger, Kurt A Alzheimers Res Ther Viewpoint Clinical diagnostic accuracy using revised consensus criteria and newly developed biomarkers ranges from 65 to 96% for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with a diagnostic specificity versus other dementias of 23 to 88%. Neuropathological assessment using molecular biology and immunohistochemistry, homogeneous definitions, harmonized interlaboratory methods, and assessment standards can identify 54 to 97% of AD cases and can eliminate 62 to 100% of nondemented subjects, but only between 8 and 42% of non-AD dementias, without, however, being able to clarify the etiology of most of these disorders. The value and pitfalls of pathological diagnostic criteria are critically discussed. BioMed Central 2010-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2876788/ /pubmed/20497615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt34 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Jellinger, Kurt A
Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title_full Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title_fullStr Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title_full_unstemmed Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title_short Con: Can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
title_sort con: can neuropathology really confirm the exact diagnosis?
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20497615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt34
work_keys_str_mv AT jellingerkurta concanneuropathologyreallyconfirmtheexactdiagnosis