Cargando…

The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Femoral impaction grafting requires vigorous impaction to obtain adequate stability without risk of fracture, but the force of impaction has not been determined. We determined this threshold force in a preliminary study using animal femurs. METHODS: Adult sow femurs were used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flannery, Olivia M, Britton, John R, O'Reilly, Peter, Mahony, Nicholas, Prendergast, Patrick J, Kenny, Paddy J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20367418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.480936
_version_ 1782181715496665088
author Flannery, Olivia M
Britton, John R
O'Reilly, Peter
Mahony, Nicholas
Prendergast, Patrick J
Kenny, Paddy J
author_facet Flannery, Olivia M
Britton, John R
O'Reilly, Peter
Mahony, Nicholas
Prendergast, Patrick J
Kenny, Paddy J
author_sort Flannery, Olivia M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Femoral impaction grafting requires vigorous impaction to obtain adequate stability without risk of fracture, but the force of impaction has not been determined. We determined this threshold force in a preliminary study using animal femurs. METHODS: Adult sow femurs were used because of their morphological similarity to human femurs in revision hip arthroplasty. 35 sow femurs were impacted with morselized bone chips and an increasing force was applied until the femur fractured. This allowed a threshold force to be established. 5 other femurs were impacted to this force and an Exeter stem was cemented into the neomedullary canal. A 28-mm Exeter head was attached and loaded by direct contact with a hydraulic testing machine. Axial cyclic loading was performed and the position sensor of the hydraulic testing machine measured the prosthetic head subsidence. RESULTS: 29 tests were completed successfully. The threshold force was found to be 4 kN. There was no statistically significant correlation between the load at fracture and the cortex-to-canal ratio or the bone mineral density. Following impaction with a maximum force of 4 kN, the average axial subsidence was 0.28 mm. INTERPRETATION: We achieved a stable construct without fracture. Further studies using human cadaveric femurs should be done to determine the threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-2876831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28768312010-09-03 The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs Flannery, Olivia M Britton, John R O'Reilly, Peter Mahony, Nicholas Prendergast, Patrick J Kenny, Paddy J Acta Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Femoral impaction grafting requires vigorous impaction to obtain adequate stability without risk of fracture, but the force of impaction has not been determined. We determined this threshold force in a preliminary study using animal femurs. METHODS: Adult sow femurs were used because of their morphological similarity to human femurs in revision hip arthroplasty. 35 sow femurs were impacted with morselized bone chips and an increasing force was applied until the femur fractured. This allowed a threshold force to be established. 5 other femurs were impacted to this force and an Exeter stem was cemented into the neomedullary canal. A 28-mm Exeter head was attached and loaded by direct contact with a hydraulic testing machine. Axial cyclic loading was performed and the position sensor of the hydraulic testing machine measured the prosthetic head subsidence. RESULTS: 29 tests were completed successfully. The threshold force was found to be 4 kN. There was no statistically significant correlation between the load at fracture and the cortex-to-canal ratio or the bone mineral density. Following impaction with a maximum force of 4 kN, the average axial subsidence was 0.28 mm. INTERPRETATION: We achieved a stable construct without fracture. Further studies using human cadaveric femurs should be done to determine the threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery. Informa Healthcare 2010-06 2010-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2876831/ /pubmed/20367418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.480936 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flannery, Olivia M
Britton, John R
O'Reilly, Peter
Mahony, Nicholas
Prendergast, Patrick J
Kenny, Paddy J
The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title_full The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title_fullStr The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title_full_unstemmed The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title_short The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs
title_sort threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: a preliminary study in sow femurs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20367418
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.480936
work_keys_str_mv AT flanneryoliviam thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT brittonjohnr thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT oreillypeter thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT mahonynicholas thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT prendergastpatrickj thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT kennypaddyj thethresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT flanneryoliviam thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT brittonjohnr thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT oreillypeter thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT mahonynicholas thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT prendergastpatrickj thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs
AT kennypaddyj thresholdforcerequiredforfemoralimpactiongraftinginrevisionhipsurgeryapreliminarystudyinsowfemurs