Cargando…

Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions

The question of whether our behavior is guided by our conscious intentions is gaining momentum within the field of cognitive neuroscience. It has been demonstrated that the subjective experience that conscious intentions are the driving force of our actions, is built partially on a post hoc reconstr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigoni, Davide, Brass, Marcel, Sartori, Giuseppe
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20508746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00038
_version_ 1782181726008639488
author Rigoni, Davide
Brass, Marcel
Sartori, Giuseppe
author_facet Rigoni, Davide
Brass, Marcel
Sartori, Giuseppe
author_sort Rigoni, Davide
collection PubMed
description The question of whether our behavior is guided by our conscious intentions is gaining momentum within the field of cognitive neuroscience. It has been demonstrated that the subjective experience that conscious intentions are the driving force of our actions, is built partially on a post hoc reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that this reconstructive process is mediated by an action-monitoring system that compares the predicted and the actual sensory consequences of an action. We applied event-related potentials (ERP) to a variant of the Libet's task in which participants were asked to press a button and to report the time of decision – will judgment (W) – to press. We provided delayed auditory feedbacks after participants’ action to signify an action time later than the actual action. We found that auditory feedbacks evoked a negative component in the 250–300 time range, namely action-effect negativity (N(AE)), that is thought to reflect the activity of a system that detects violation from expectancies. We showed that the amplitude of the N(AE) was sensitive to the delay of the auditory feedback, with a larger amplitude for more delayed feedbacks. Furthermore, changes in the N(AE) were also associated with changes in the reported W. These results not only confirm that we infer the time we decided to act from events occurring after the response, but these results also indicate that the subjective experience of when an action is decided is influenced by the activity of an action-monitoring system that detects mismatches between predicted and actual sensory consequences of the actions.
format Text
id pubmed-2876876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28768762010-05-27 Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions Rigoni, Davide Brass, Marcel Sartori, Giuseppe Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The question of whether our behavior is guided by our conscious intentions is gaining momentum within the field of cognitive neuroscience. It has been demonstrated that the subjective experience that conscious intentions are the driving force of our actions, is built partially on a post hoc reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that this reconstructive process is mediated by an action-monitoring system that compares the predicted and the actual sensory consequences of an action. We applied event-related potentials (ERP) to a variant of the Libet's task in which participants were asked to press a button and to report the time of decision – will judgment (W) – to press. We provided delayed auditory feedbacks after participants’ action to signify an action time later than the actual action. We found that auditory feedbacks evoked a negative component in the 250–300 time range, namely action-effect negativity (N(AE)), that is thought to reflect the activity of a system that detects violation from expectancies. We showed that the amplitude of the N(AE) was sensitive to the delay of the auditory feedback, with a larger amplitude for more delayed feedbacks. Furthermore, changes in the N(AE) were also associated with changes in the reported W. These results not only confirm that we infer the time we decided to act from events occurring after the response, but these results also indicate that the subjective experience of when an action is decided is influenced by the activity of an action-monitoring system that detects mismatches between predicted and actual sensory consequences of the actions. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2876876/ /pubmed/20508746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00038 Text en Copyright © 2010 Rigoni, Brass and Sartori. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rigoni, Davide
Brass, Marcel
Sartori, Giuseppe
Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title_full Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title_fullStr Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title_full_unstemmed Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title_short Post-Action Determinants of the Reported Time of Conscious Intentions
title_sort post-action determinants of the reported time of conscious intentions
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20508746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00038
work_keys_str_mv AT rigonidavide postactiondeterminantsofthereportedtimeofconsciousintentions
AT brassmarcel postactiondeterminantsofthereportedtimeofconsciousintentions
AT sartorigiuseppe postactiondeterminantsofthereportedtimeofconsciousintentions