Cargando…

Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care

BACKGROUND: The scientific congress of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties aims to review and improve the guidelines for the selection process of trainees, a selection process that is based on equal opportunity and upholds the principles of consistency, objec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tashkandi, Jamal A. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.57881
_version_ 1782181739271028736
author Tashkandi, Jamal A. A.
author_facet Tashkandi, Jamal A. A.
author_sort Tashkandi, Jamal A. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scientific congress of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties aims to review and improve the guidelines for the selection process of trainees, a selection process that is based on equal opportunity and upholds the principles of consistency, objectiveness, transparency, and procedural fairness. The study represents a step toward the goal of fostering quality patient care, by adopting a selection process that would result in graduating good, committed, and competent specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports of admission examinations in Jeddah, Riyadh, and the Eastern region have been collected, and they contain detailed lists of names, scores, and percentages of the criteria of admissions, that is, MBBS 25%, General Examination 50%, Interview 25%, and overall score of 100%. RESULTS: Mean MBBS scores, average general examination scores, average interview scores, and average overall scores were not statistically different between candidates from different regions. The leading predictor was the ‘Interview Score’. 49.5% of variation in the dependent variable (overall score) could be significantly explained (F = 69.4, P < 0.05) by the independent variable ‘Interview Score’. The second predictor was the ‘MBBS score’. CONCLUSION: The three components MBBS, General Examination, and Interview, were significant predictors of the overall score. The leading predictor was the ‘Interview Score’. The author recommended that the selection process should be under continuous review. The general interview guide approach is recommended to ensure that the same general areas of information are collected from each interviewer. Questions of a personal or discriminatory nature should be avoided.
format Text
id pubmed-2876940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28769402010-06-07 Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care Tashkandi, Jamal A. A. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: The scientific congress of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties aims to review and improve the guidelines for the selection process of trainees, a selection process that is based on equal opportunity and upholds the principles of consistency, objectiveness, transparency, and procedural fairness. The study represents a step toward the goal of fostering quality patient care, by adopting a selection process that would result in graduating good, committed, and competent specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports of admission examinations in Jeddah, Riyadh, and the Eastern region have been collected, and they contain detailed lists of names, scores, and percentages of the criteria of admissions, that is, MBBS 25%, General Examination 50%, Interview 25%, and overall score of 100%. RESULTS: Mean MBBS scores, average general examination scores, average interview scores, and average overall scores were not statistically different between candidates from different regions. The leading predictor was the ‘Interview Score’. 49.5% of variation in the dependent variable (overall score) could be significantly explained (F = 69.4, P < 0.05) by the independent variable ‘Interview Score’. The second predictor was the ‘MBBS score’. CONCLUSION: The three components MBBS, General Examination, and Interview, were significant predictors of the overall score. The leading predictor was the ‘Interview Score’. The author recommended that the selection process should be under continuous review. The general interview guide approach is recommended to ensure that the same general areas of information are collected from each interviewer. Questions of a personal or discriminatory nature should be avoided. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2876940/ /pubmed/20532106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.57881 Text en © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tashkandi, Jamal A. A.
Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title_full Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title_fullStr Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title_short Criteria of acceptance in the Saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
title_sort criteria of acceptance in the saudi program of anesthesia and intensive care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.57881
work_keys_str_mv AT tashkandijamalaa criteriaofacceptanceinthesaudiprogramofanesthesiaandintensivecare