Cargando…
Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
BACKGROUND: Oncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of suc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20470368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-26 |
_version_ | 1782181742365376512 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Mara Veiga, Isabel Ribeiro, Franclim R Vieira, Joana Pinto, Carla Pinheiro, Manuela Mesquita, Bárbara Santos, Catarina Soares, Marta Dinis, José Santos, Lúcio Lopes, Paula Afonso, Mariana Lopes, Carlos Teixeira, Manuel R |
author_facet | Silva, Mara Veiga, Isabel Ribeiro, Franclim R Vieira, Joana Pinto, Carla Pinheiro, Manuela Mesquita, Bárbara Santos, Catarina Soares, Marta Dinis, José Santos, Lúcio Lopes, Paula Afonso, Mariana Lopes, Carlos Teixeira, Manuel R |
author_sort | Silva, Mara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of such alterations for the biology and clinical behavior of GIST, however, remains elusive. METHODS: In the present study, somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA were evaluated by direct sequencing analysis in a consecutive series of 80 GIST patients. For a subset of 29 tumors, comparative genomic hybridization was additionally used to screen for chromosome copy number aberrations. Genotype and genomic findings were cross-tabulated and compared with available clinical and follow-up data. RESULTS: We report an overall mutation frequency of 87.5%, with 76.25% of the tumors showing alterations in KIT and 11.25% in PDGFRA. Secondary KIT mutations were additionally found in two of four samples obtained after imatinib treatment. Chromosomal imbalances were detected in 25 out of 29 tumors (86%), namely losses at 14q (88% of abnormal cases), 22q (44%), 1p (44%), and 15q (36%), and gains at 1q (16%) and 12q (20%). In addition to clinico-pathological high-risk groups, patients with KIT mutations, genomic complexity, genomic gains and deletions at either 1p or 22q showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival. Furthermore, genomic complexity was the best predictor of disease progression in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutational status, our findings indicate that secondary chromosomal changes contribute significantly to tumor development and progression of GIST and that genomic complexity carries independent prognostic value that complements clinico-pathological and genotype information. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2876987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28769872010-05-27 Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors Silva, Mara Veiga, Isabel Ribeiro, Franclim R Vieira, Joana Pinto, Carla Pinheiro, Manuela Mesquita, Bárbara Santos, Catarina Soares, Marta Dinis, José Santos, Lúcio Lopes, Paula Afonso, Mariana Lopes, Carlos Teixeira, Manuel R BMC Med Research article BACKGROUND: Oncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of such alterations for the biology and clinical behavior of GIST, however, remains elusive. METHODS: In the present study, somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA were evaluated by direct sequencing analysis in a consecutive series of 80 GIST patients. For a subset of 29 tumors, comparative genomic hybridization was additionally used to screen for chromosome copy number aberrations. Genotype and genomic findings were cross-tabulated and compared with available clinical and follow-up data. RESULTS: We report an overall mutation frequency of 87.5%, with 76.25% of the tumors showing alterations in KIT and 11.25% in PDGFRA. Secondary KIT mutations were additionally found in two of four samples obtained after imatinib treatment. Chromosomal imbalances were detected in 25 out of 29 tumors (86%), namely losses at 14q (88% of abnormal cases), 22q (44%), 1p (44%), and 15q (36%), and gains at 1q (16%) and 12q (20%). In addition to clinico-pathological high-risk groups, patients with KIT mutations, genomic complexity, genomic gains and deletions at either 1p or 22q showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival. Furthermore, genomic complexity was the best predictor of disease progression in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutational status, our findings indicate that secondary chromosomal changes contribute significantly to tumor development and progression of GIST and that genomic complexity carries independent prognostic value that complements clinico-pathological and genotype information. BioMed Central 2010-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2876987/ /pubmed/20470368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-26 Text en Copyright ©2010 Silva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Silva, Mara Veiga, Isabel Ribeiro, Franclim R Vieira, Joana Pinto, Carla Pinheiro, Manuela Mesquita, Bárbara Santos, Catarina Soares, Marta Dinis, José Santos, Lúcio Lopes, Paula Afonso, Mariana Lopes, Carlos Teixeira, Manuel R Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title | Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full | Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_fullStr | Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_short | Chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of KIT/PDGFRA point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_sort | chromosome copy number changes carry prognostic information independent of kit/pdgfra point mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2876987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20470368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvamara chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT veigaisabel chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT ribeirofranclimr chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT vieirajoana chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT pintocarla chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT pinheiromanuela chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT mesquitabarbara chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT santoscatarina chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT soaresmarta chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT dinisjose chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT santoslucio chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT lopespaula chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT afonsomariana chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT lopescarlos chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors AT teixeiramanuelr chromosomecopynumberchangescarryprognosticinformationindependentofkitpdgfrapointmutationsingastrointestinalstromaltumors |