Cargando…
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, efficacy and long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of data of pediatric patients under the age of 15 years, who had undergone laparoscopic pyeloplasty from January 2000 to June 2008 was...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60441 |
_version_ | 1782181869061668864 |
---|---|
author | Maheshwari, Ruchir Ansari, M. S. Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kapoor, Rakesh |
author_facet | Maheshwari, Ruchir Ansari, M. S. Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kapoor, Rakesh |
author_sort | Maheshwari, Ruchir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, efficacy and long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of data of pediatric patients under the age of 15 years, who had undergone laparoscopic pyeloplasty from January 2000 to June 2008 was done. The various parameters analyzed were; operative time, blood loss, need for analgesics, intra/postoperative complications, hospital stay and postoperative outcome. Success was defined on the basis of either improvement in the symptoms/or better drainage on postoperative isotope renography. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with a mean age of 7.12 years (four months to 15 years) and male to female ratio of 4.3:1 were included in the study. Dismembered pyeloplasty was done in 70 patients and Foley Y-V plasty in 12 patients via transperitoneal approach using three ports in 79 or four ports in three children. Mean operative time was 151 minutes (78-369); mean blood loss was 88.01 ml (50-250) with a mean hospital stay of 5.05 days (2-11). Conversion to open surgery was required in four (4.87%) patients. Follow-up renograms were available in 74 patients who showed improvement in drainage in 69 patients and obstructed pattern in five; of these two patients had significant deterioration in split function. Two patients among the obstructed group underwent redo pyeloplasty by open technique while the rest three elected for conservative approach. At a mean follow-up of 41.58 months (8-75) the overall success rate was 91.89%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is effective and safe in children with minimal morbidity and gives excellent long-term results. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2878435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28784352010-06-09 Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience Maheshwari, Ruchir Ansari, M. S. Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kapoor, Rakesh Indian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, efficacy and long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of data of pediatric patients under the age of 15 years, who had undergone laparoscopic pyeloplasty from January 2000 to June 2008 was done. The various parameters analyzed were; operative time, blood loss, need for analgesics, intra/postoperative complications, hospital stay and postoperative outcome. Success was defined on the basis of either improvement in the symptoms/or better drainage on postoperative isotope renography. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with a mean age of 7.12 years (four months to 15 years) and male to female ratio of 4.3:1 were included in the study. Dismembered pyeloplasty was done in 70 patients and Foley Y-V plasty in 12 patients via transperitoneal approach using three ports in 79 or four ports in three children. Mean operative time was 151 minutes (78-369); mean blood loss was 88.01 ml (50-250) with a mean hospital stay of 5.05 days (2-11). Conversion to open surgery was required in four (4.87%) patients. Follow-up renograms were available in 74 patients who showed improvement in drainage in 69 patients and obstructed pattern in five; of these two patients had significant deterioration in split function. Two patients among the obstructed group underwent redo pyeloplasty by open technique while the rest three elected for conservative approach. At a mean follow-up of 41.58 months (8-75) the overall success rate was 91.89%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is effective and safe in children with minimal morbidity and gives excellent long-term results. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2878435/ /pubmed/20535282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60441 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Maheshwari, Ruchir Ansari, M. S. Mandhani, Anil Srivastava, Aneesh Kapoor, Rakesh Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title | Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: The SGPGI experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: the sgpgi experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535282 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.60441 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maheshwariruchir laparoscopicpyeloplastyinpediatricpatientsthesgpgiexperience AT ansarims laparoscopicpyeloplastyinpediatricpatientsthesgpgiexperience AT mandhanianil laparoscopicpyeloplastyinpediatricpatientsthesgpgiexperience AT srivastavaaneesh laparoscopicpyeloplastyinpediatricpatientsthesgpgiexperience AT kapoorrakesh laparoscopicpyeloplastyinpediatricpatientsthesgpgiexperience |