Cargando…
Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216 |
_version_ | 1782181885234905088 |
---|---|
author | Leblanc, F. Champagne, B. J. Augestad, K. M. Stein, S. L. Marderstein, E. Reynolds, H. L. Delaney, C. P. |
author_facet | Leblanc, F. Champagne, B. J. Augestad, K. M. Stein, S. L. Marderstein, E. Reynolds, H. L. Delaney, C. P. |
author_sort | Leblanc, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar length, conversion, complications, and hospitalization duration. Results. The review analyzed seventeen SILCs by seven surgical teams. A single port system was used by four teams. No team used the same laparoscope. Two teams used two laparoscopes. All teams used curved instruments. SILC time was 116 ± 34 minutes. Final scar was longer than port incision (31 ± 7 versus 24 ± 8 mm; P = .036). No conversion was reported. The only complication was a bacteremia. Hospitalization was 5 ± 2 days. Conclusion. SILC is feasible. A single incision around the umbilical scar represents cosmetic progress. Comparative studies are needed to assess potential abdominal wall and recovery benefits to justify the increased cost of SILC. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2878685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28786852010-06-28 Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits Leblanc, F. Champagne, B. J. Augestad, K. M. Stein, S. L. Marderstein, E. Reynolds, H. L. Delaney, C. P. Diagn Ther Endosc Review Article Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar length, conversion, complications, and hospitalization duration. Results. The review analyzed seventeen SILCs by seven surgical teams. A single port system was used by four teams. No team used the same laparoscope. Two teams used two laparoscopes. All teams used curved instruments. SILC time was 116 ± 34 minutes. Final scar was longer than port incision (31 ± 7 versus 24 ± 8 mm; P = .036). No conversion was reported. The only complication was a bacteremia. Hospitalization was 5 ± 2 days. Conclusion. SILC is feasible. A single incision around the umbilical scar represents cosmetic progress. Comparative studies are needed to assess potential abdominal wall and recovery benefits to justify the increased cost of SILC. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2878685/ /pubmed/20585367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216 Text en Copyright © 2010 F. Leblanc et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Leblanc, F. Champagne, B. J. Augestad, K. M. Stein, S. L. Marderstein, E. Reynolds, H. L. Delaney, C. P. Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title | Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title_full | Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title_fullStr | Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title_full_unstemmed | Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title_short | Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits |
title_sort | single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leblancf singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT champagnebj singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT augestadkm singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT steinsl singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT mardersteine singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT reynoldshl singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits AT delaneycp singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits |