Cargando…

Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits

Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leblanc, F., Champagne, B. J., Augestad, K. M., Stein, S. L., Marderstein, E., Reynolds, H. L., Delaney, C. P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216
_version_ 1782181885234905088
author Leblanc, F.
Champagne, B. J.
Augestad, K. M.
Stein, S. L.
Marderstein, E.
Reynolds, H. L.
Delaney, C. P.
author_facet Leblanc, F.
Champagne, B. J.
Augestad, K. M.
Stein, S. L.
Marderstein, E.
Reynolds, H. L.
Delaney, C. P.
author_sort Leblanc, F.
collection PubMed
description Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar length, conversion, complications, and hospitalization duration. Results. The review analyzed seventeen SILCs by seven surgical teams. A single port system was used by four teams. No team used the same laparoscope. Two teams used two laparoscopes. All teams used curved instruments. SILC time was 116 ± 34 minutes. Final scar was longer than port incision (31 ± 7 versus 24 ± 8 mm; P = .036). No conversion was reported. The only complication was a bacteremia. Hospitalization was 5 ± 2 days. Conclusion. SILC is feasible. A single incision around the umbilical scar represents cosmetic progress. Comparative studies are needed to assess potential abdominal wall and recovery benefits to justify the increased cost of SILC.
format Text
id pubmed-2878685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28786852010-06-28 Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits Leblanc, F. Champagne, B. J. Augestad, K. M. Stein, S. L. Marderstein, E. Reynolds, H. L. Delaney, C. P. Diagn Ther Endosc Review Article Background. This paper studied technical aspects and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC). Methods. Bibliographic search was carried out up to October 2009 including original articles, case reports, and technical notes. Assessed criteria were techniques, operative time, scar length, conversion, complications, and hospitalization duration. Results. The review analyzed seventeen SILCs by seven surgical teams. A single port system was used by four teams. No team used the same laparoscope. Two teams used two laparoscopes. All teams used curved instruments. SILC time was 116 ± 34 minutes. Final scar was longer than port incision (31 ± 7 versus 24 ± 8 mm; P = .036). No conversion was reported. The only complication was a bacteremia. Hospitalization was 5 ± 2 days. Conclusion. SILC is feasible. A single incision around the umbilical scar represents cosmetic progress. Comparative studies are needed to assess potential abdominal wall and recovery benefits to justify the increased cost of SILC. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2878685/ /pubmed/20585367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216 Text en Copyright © 2010 F. Leblanc et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Leblanc, F.
Champagne, B. J.
Augestad, K. M.
Stein, S. L.
Marderstein, E.
Reynolds, H. L.
Delaney, C. P.
Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title_full Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title_fullStr Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title_full_unstemmed Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title_short Single Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy: Technical Aspects, Feasibility, and Expected Benefits
title_sort single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2878685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/913216
work_keys_str_mv AT leblancf singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT champagnebj singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT augestadkm singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT steinsl singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT mardersteine singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT reynoldshl singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits
AT delaneycp singleincisionlaparoscopiccolectomytechnicalaspectsfeasibilityandexpectedbenefits