Cargando…
A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests
BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the KRAS gene occur frequently in human tumors, including colorectal carcinomas; most mutations occur in codons 12 and 13. Mutations in KRAS have been associated with poor response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. Therefore, an accurate and rea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-5-23 |
_version_ | 1782181907985858560 |
---|---|
author | Oliner, Kelly Juan, Todd Suggs, Sid Wolf, Michael Sarosi, Ildiko Freeman, Daniel J Gyuris, Tibor Baron, Will Bakker, Andreas Parker, Alex Patterson, Scott D |
author_facet | Oliner, Kelly Juan, Todd Suggs, Sid Wolf, Michael Sarosi, Ildiko Freeman, Daniel J Gyuris, Tibor Baron, Will Bakker, Andreas Parker, Alex Patterson, Scott D |
author_sort | Oliner, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the KRAS gene occur frequently in human tumors, including colorectal carcinomas; most mutations occur in codons 12 and 13. Mutations in KRAS have been associated with poor response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. Therefore, an accurate and readily available analysis of KRAS mutational status is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate concordance between KRAS assays performed by 6 different laboratories. METHODS: Forty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tumor samples were obtained. Sample sections were submitted for KRAS mutation analysis to 5 independent commercial laboratories (Agencourt, Gentris, Genzyme, HistoGeneX, and Invitek) and to the Amgen DNA Sequencing Laboratory for direct polymerase chain reaction sequencing. The assay used by Invitek is no longer commercially available and has been replaced by an alternative technique. Results from the commercial services were compared with those from Amgen direct sequencing by κ statistics. RESULTS: KRAS mutations were observed in codon 12 and/or 13 in 20 of 40 (50%) samples in Amgen direct sequencing assays. Results from HistoGeneX (κ = 0.95), Genzyme (κ = 0.94), and Agencourt (κ = 0.94) were in almost perfect agreement with these results, and the results from Gentris were in substantial agreement with the results from Amgen (κ = 0.75). The Invitek allele-specific assay demonstrated slight agreement (κ = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data on the comparability of KRAS mutational analyses. The results suggest that most (but not all) commercial services provide analysis that is accurate and comparable with direct sequencing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2879238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28792382010-06-02 A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests Oliner, Kelly Juan, Todd Suggs, Sid Wolf, Michael Sarosi, Ildiko Freeman, Daniel J Gyuris, Tibor Baron, Will Bakker, Andreas Parker, Alex Patterson, Scott D Diagn Pathol Short Report BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the KRAS gene occur frequently in human tumors, including colorectal carcinomas; most mutations occur in codons 12 and 13. Mutations in KRAS have been associated with poor response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. Therefore, an accurate and readily available analysis of KRAS mutational status is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate concordance between KRAS assays performed by 6 different laboratories. METHODS: Forty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tumor samples were obtained. Sample sections were submitted for KRAS mutation analysis to 5 independent commercial laboratories (Agencourt, Gentris, Genzyme, HistoGeneX, and Invitek) and to the Amgen DNA Sequencing Laboratory for direct polymerase chain reaction sequencing. The assay used by Invitek is no longer commercially available and has been replaced by an alternative technique. Results from the commercial services were compared with those from Amgen direct sequencing by κ statistics. RESULTS: KRAS mutations were observed in codon 12 and/or 13 in 20 of 40 (50%) samples in Amgen direct sequencing assays. Results from HistoGeneX (κ = 0.95), Genzyme (κ = 0.94), and Agencourt (κ = 0.94) were in almost perfect agreement with these results, and the results from Gentris were in substantial agreement with the results from Amgen (κ = 0.75). The Invitek allele-specific assay demonstrated slight agreement (κ = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data on the comparability of KRAS mutational analyses. The results suggest that most (but not all) commercial services provide analysis that is accurate and comparable with direct sequencing. BioMed Central 2010-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2879238/ /pubmed/20398393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-5-23 Text en Copyright ©2010 Oliner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Oliner, Kelly Juan, Todd Suggs, Sid Wolf, Michael Sarosi, Ildiko Freeman, Daniel J Gyuris, Tibor Baron, Will Bakker, Andreas Parker, Alex Patterson, Scott D A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title | A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title_full | A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title_fullStr | A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title_short | A comparability study of 5 commercial KRAS tests |
title_sort | comparability study of 5 commercial kras tests |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20398393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-5-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olinerkelly acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT juantodd acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT suggssid acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT wolfmichael acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT sarosiildiko acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT freemandanielj acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT gyuristibor acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT baronwill acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT bakkerandreas acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT parkeralex acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT pattersonscottd acomparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT olinerkelly comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT juantodd comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT suggssid comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT wolfmichael comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT sarosiildiko comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT freemandanielj comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT gyuristibor comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT baronwill comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT bakkerandreas comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT parkeralex comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests AT pattersonscottd comparabilitystudyof5commercialkrastests |