Cargando…
Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature
BACKGROUND: The split-course schedule of chemo-radiation for anal cancer is controversial. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with invasive anal cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) with a mandatory split of 12 days (52 patients, Montreal, Canada) or without an intended split (3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-36 |
_version_ | 1782181909911044096 |
---|---|
author | Oehler, Christoph Provencher, Sawyna Donath, David Bahary, Jean-Paul Lütolf, Urs M Ciernik, I Frank |
author_facet | Oehler, Christoph Provencher, Sawyna Donath, David Bahary, Jean-Paul Lütolf, Urs M Ciernik, I Frank |
author_sort | Oehler, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The split-course schedule of chemo-radiation for anal cancer is controversial. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with invasive anal cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) with a mandatory split of 12 days (52 patients, Montreal, Canada) or without an intended split (32 patients, Zurich, Switzerland) were reviewed. Total RT doses were 52 Gy (Montreal) or 59.4 Gy (Zurich) given concurrently with 5-FU/MMC. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 40 ± 27 months, overall survival and local tumor control at 5 years were 57% and 78% (Zurich) compared to 67% and 82% (Montreal), respectively. Split duration of patients with or without local relapse was 15 ± 7 d vs. 14 ± 7 d (Montreal, NS) and 11 ± 11 d vs. 5 ± 7 d (Zurich; P < 0.001). Patients from Zurich with prolonged treatment interruption (≥ 7 d) had impaired cancer-specific survival compared with patients with only minor interruption (<7 d) (P = 0.06). Bowel toxicity was associated with prolonged RT (P = 0.03) duration as well as increased relapse probability (P = 0.05). Skin toxicity correlated with institution and was found in 79% (Montreal) and 28% (Zurich) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study design did not allow demonstrating a clear difference in efficacy between the treatment regimens with or without short mandatory split. Cause-specific outcome appears to be impaired by unplanned prolonged interruption. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2879246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28792462010-06-02 Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature Oehler, Christoph Provencher, Sawyna Donath, David Bahary, Jean-Paul Lütolf, Urs M Ciernik, I Frank Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The split-course schedule of chemo-radiation for anal cancer is controversial. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with invasive anal cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) with a mandatory split of 12 days (52 patients, Montreal, Canada) or without an intended split (32 patients, Zurich, Switzerland) were reviewed. Total RT doses were 52 Gy (Montreal) or 59.4 Gy (Zurich) given concurrently with 5-FU/MMC. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 40 ± 27 months, overall survival and local tumor control at 5 years were 57% and 78% (Zurich) compared to 67% and 82% (Montreal), respectively. Split duration of patients with or without local relapse was 15 ± 7 d vs. 14 ± 7 d (Montreal, NS) and 11 ± 11 d vs. 5 ± 7 d (Zurich; P < 0.001). Patients from Zurich with prolonged treatment interruption (≥ 7 d) had impaired cancer-specific survival compared with patients with only minor interruption (<7 d) (P = 0.06). Bowel toxicity was associated with prolonged RT (P = 0.03) duration as well as increased relapse probability (P = 0.05). Skin toxicity correlated with institution and was found in 79% (Montreal) and 28% (Zurich) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study design did not allow demonstrating a clear difference in efficacy between the treatment regimens with or without short mandatory split. Cause-specific outcome appears to be impaired by unplanned prolonged interruption. BioMed Central 2010-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2879246/ /pubmed/20465811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-36 Text en Copyright ©2010 Oehler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Oehler, Christoph Provencher, Sawyna Donath, David Bahary, Jean-Paul Lütolf, Urs M Ciernik, I Frank Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title | Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title_full | Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title_short | Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
title_sort | chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oehlerchristoph chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature AT provenchersawyna chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature AT donathdavid chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature AT baharyjeanpaul chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature AT lutolfursm chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature AT ciernikifrank chemoradiationwithorwithoutmandatorysplitinanalcarcinomaexperiencesoftwoinstitutionsandreviewoftheliterature |