Cargando…

Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?

BACKGROUND: The influence of hypertension on cardiovascular risk is well known. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is able to identify patients with masked hypertension (MH) underdetected by clinical BP measurement. The benefit of screening for MH in a high-risk population was investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delsart, Pascal, Marboeuf, Philippe, Delhaye, Cedric, Lemesle, Gilles, Mounier-Vehier, Claire
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20531952
_version_ 1782181915341619200
author Delsart, Pascal
Marboeuf, Philippe
Delhaye, Cedric
Lemesle, Gilles
Mounier-Vehier, Claire
author_facet Delsart, Pascal
Marboeuf, Philippe
Delhaye, Cedric
Lemesle, Gilles
Mounier-Vehier, Claire
author_sort Delsart, Pascal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of hypertension on cardiovascular risk is well known. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is able to identify patients with masked hypertension (MH) underdetected by clinical BP measurement. The benefit of screening for MH in a high-risk population was investigated. AIMS: To detect MH in a population with no prior history of hypertension and medically treated for peripheral or coronary arterial disease. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with peripheral or coronary artery disease documented with arteriography, without a history of hypertension, and with an admission BP < 140/90 mmHg underwent ABPM after discharge. Ambulatory BP ≥ 125/80 mmHg were defined as MH. RESULTS: MH was found in 11 patients (28.9%). The MH group had a mean systolic and diastolic hospitalization BP significantly higher (127 versus 115 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.002 and 76 versus 66 mmHg, P = 0.01), and tended to have a higher admission systolic BP and pulse pressure (127 versus 121 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.07; and 54 versus 46 mmHg, P = 0.06). The first BP measurement on the 24-hour ABPM was significantly higher in the MH group 140 versus 121 mmHg, P = 0.001, for systolic BP and 84 versus 74 mmHg, P = 0.03, for diastolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: MH was found in patients with documented and medically treated vascular disease. BP in the prehypertensive range is associated with MH. Systematic screening for MH in this high-risk population requires further investigation.
format Text
id pubmed-2879295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28792952010-06-07 Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease? Delsart, Pascal Marboeuf, Philippe Delhaye, Cedric Lemesle, Gilles Mounier-Vehier, Claire Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: The influence of hypertension on cardiovascular risk is well known. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is able to identify patients with masked hypertension (MH) underdetected by clinical BP measurement. The benefit of screening for MH in a high-risk population was investigated. AIMS: To detect MH in a population with no prior history of hypertension and medically treated for peripheral or coronary arterial disease. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with peripheral or coronary artery disease documented with arteriography, without a history of hypertension, and with an admission BP < 140/90 mmHg underwent ABPM after discharge. Ambulatory BP ≥ 125/80 mmHg were defined as MH. RESULTS: MH was found in 11 patients (28.9%). The MH group had a mean systolic and diastolic hospitalization BP significantly higher (127 versus 115 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.002 and 76 versus 66 mmHg, P = 0.01), and tended to have a higher admission systolic BP and pulse pressure (127 versus 121 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.07; and 54 versus 46 mmHg, P = 0.06). The first BP measurement on the 24-hour ABPM was significantly higher in the MH group 140 versus 121 mmHg, P = 0.001, for systolic BP and 84 versus 74 mmHg, P = 0.03, for diastolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: MH was found in patients with documented and medically treated vascular disease. BP in the prehypertensive range is associated with MH. Systematic screening for MH in this high-risk population requires further investigation. Dove Medical Press 2010 2010-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2879295/ /pubmed/20531952 Text en © 2010 Delsart et a1, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Delsart, Pascal
Marboeuf, Philippe
Delhaye, Cedric
Lemesle, Gilles
Mounier-Vehier, Claire
Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title_full Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title_fullStr Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title_full_unstemmed Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title_short Should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
title_sort should we screen for masked hypertension in patient with vascular disease?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20531952
work_keys_str_mv AT delsartpascal shouldwescreenformaskedhypertensioninpatientwithvasculardisease
AT marboeufphilippe shouldwescreenformaskedhypertensioninpatientwithvasculardisease
AT delhayecedric shouldwescreenformaskedhypertensioninpatientwithvasculardisease
AT lemeslegilles shouldwescreenformaskedhypertensioninpatientwithvasculardisease
AT mouniervehierclaire shouldwescreenformaskedhypertensioninpatientwithvasculardisease