Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample

The aim of this study is to assess the effective measurement range of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being scales (PWB). It applies normal ogive item response theory (IRT) methodology using factor analysis procedures for ordinal data based on a limited information estimation approach. The data come from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbott, Rosemary A., Ploubidis, George B., Huppert, Felicia A., Kuh, Diana, Croudace, Tim J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20543875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x
_version_ 1782181929755344896
author Abbott, Rosemary A.
Ploubidis, George B.
Huppert, Felicia A.
Kuh, Diana
Croudace, Tim J.
author_facet Abbott, Rosemary A.
Ploubidis, George B.
Huppert, Felicia A.
Kuh, Diana
Croudace, Tim J.
author_sort Abbott, Rosemary A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to assess the effective measurement range of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being scales (PWB). It applies normal ogive item response theory (IRT) methodology using factor analysis procedures for ordinal data based on a limited information estimation approach. The data come from a sample of 1,179 women participating in a midlife follow-up of a national birth cohort study in the UK. The PWB scales incorporate six dimensions: autonomy, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life and self-acceptance. Scale information functions were calculated to derive standard errors of measurement for estimated scores on each dimension. Construct variance was distinguished from method variance by inclusion of method factors from item wording (positive versus negative). Our IRT analysis revealed that the PWB measures well-being most accurately in the middle range of the score distribution, i.e. for women with average well-being. Score precision diminished at higher levels of well-being, and low well-being was measured more reliably than high well-being. A second-order well-being factor loaded by four of the dimensions achieved higher measurement precision and greater score accuracy across a wider range than any individual dimension. Future development of well-being scales should be designed to include items that are able to discriminate at high levels of well-being.
format Text
id pubmed-2879484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28794842010-06-10 An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample Abbott, Rosemary A. Ploubidis, George B. Huppert, Felicia A. Kuh, Diana Croudace, Tim J. Soc Indic Res Article The aim of this study is to assess the effective measurement range of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being scales (PWB). It applies normal ogive item response theory (IRT) methodology using factor analysis procedures for ordinal data based on a limited information estimation approach. The data come from a sample of 1,179 women participating in a midlife follow-up of a national birth cohort study in the UK. The PWB scales incorporate six dimensions: autonomy, positive relations with others, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life and self-acceptance. Scale information functions were calculated to derive standard errors of measurement for estimated scores on each dimension. Construct variance was distinguished from method variance by inclusion of method factors from item wording (positive versus negative). Our IRT analysis revealed that the PWB measures well-being most accurately in the middle range of the score distribution, i.e. for women with average well-being. Score precision diminished at higher levels of well-being, and low well-being was measured more reliably than high well-being. A second-order well-being factor loaded by four of the dimensions achieved higher measurement precision and greater score accuracy across a wider range than any individual dimension. Future development of well-being scales should be designed to include items that are able to discriminate at high levels of well-being. Springer Netherlands 2009-09-01 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2879484/ /pubmed/20543875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Abbott, Rosemary A.
Ploubidis, George B.
Huppert, Felicia A.
Kuh, Diana
Croudace, Tim J.
An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title_full An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title_short An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample
title_sort evaluation of the precision of measurement of ryff’s psychological well-being scales in a population sample
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20543875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x
work_keys_str_mv AT abbottrosemarya anevaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT ploubidisgeorgeb anevaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT huppertfeliciaa anevaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT kuhdiana anevaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT croudacetimj anevaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT abbottrosemarya evaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT ploubidisgeorgeb evaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT huppertfeliciaa evaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT kuhdiana evaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample
AT croudacetimj evaluationoftheprecisionofmeasurementofryffspsychologicalwellbeingscalesinapopulationsample