A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study

AIM: Aim of this in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strength of UniFil Bond (GC America) vs iBond (Heraeus Kulzer) in conjunction with light cure composite resin (Venus, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular molars were taken and divided into 3 groups which were treate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chopra, Viresh, Sharma, Himanshu, Prasad, S Datta
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2009
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20543915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.57632
_version_ 1782181952861765632
author Chopra, Viresh
Sharma, Himanshu
Prasad, S Datta
author_facet Chopra, Viresh
Sharma, Himanshu
Prasad, S Datta
author_sort Chopra, Viresh
collection PubMed
description AIM: Aim of this in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strength of UniFil Bond (GC America) vs iBond (Heraeus Kulzer) in conjunction with light cure composite resin (Venus, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular molars were taken and divided into 3 groups which were treated with UniFil Bond, iBond and no adhesive respectively. The tensile test was performed using an Instron machine. RESULTS: The results showed that multibottle systems (UniFil Bond, i.e., two-step)performed 30% better as compared with single bottle systems (all-in-one, i.e., one-step bonding agents). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that UniFil Bond (Multibottle system – 6(th)generation type I) performed better than iBond (Single Bottle system – 7th generation.
format Text
id pubmed-2879715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28797152010-06-11 A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study Chopra, Viresh Sharma, Himanshu Prasad, S Datta J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: Aim of this in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strength of UniFil Bond (GC America) vs iBond (Heraeus Kulzer) in conjunction with light cure composite resin (Venus, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty mandibular molars were taken and divided into 3 groups which were treated with UniFil Bond, iBond and no adhesive respectively. The tensile test was performed using an Instron machine. RESULTS: The results showed that multibottle systems (UniFil Bond, i.e., two-step)performed 30% better as compared with single bottle systems (all-in-one, i.e., one-step bonding agents). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that UniFil Bond (Multibottle system – 6(th)generation type I) performed better than iBond (Single Bottle system – 7th generation. Medknow Publications 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC2879715/ /pubmed/20543915 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.57632 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chopra, Viresh
Sharma, Himanshu
Prasad, S Datta
A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – An in-vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents – an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20543915
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.57632
work_keys_str_mv AT chopraviresh acomparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT sharmahimanshu acomparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT prasadsdatta acomparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT chopraviresh comparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT sharmahimanshu comparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT prasadsdatta comparativeevaluationofthebondingefficacyoftwostepvsallinonebondingagentsaninvitrostudy

Ejemplares similares