Cargando…

Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breslau, Erica S., Rochester, Phyllis W., Saslow, Debbie, Crocoll, Caroline E., Johnson, Lenora E., Vinson, Cynthia A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20394701
_version_ 1782181980837773312
author Breslau, Erica S.
Rochester, Phyllis W.
Saslow, Debbie
Crocoll, Caroline E.
Johnson, Lenora E.
Vinson, Cynthia A.
author_facet Breslau, Erica S.
Rochester, Phyllis W.
Saslow, Debbie
Crocoll, Caroline E.
Johnson, Lenora E.
Vinson, Cynthia A.
author_sort Breslau, Erica S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental agency collaborated with county-level public health counterparts from 6 states to address screening disparities in cervical and breast cancer in counties with the highest prevalence. This case study describes lessons learned from Team Up, a model pilot program. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative case study including 5 Southern states and 1 Midwestern state: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The 6 states underwent a 5-step process to adopt, adapt, and implement 1 of 3 evidence-based interventions designed for cervical and breast cancer screening. OUTCOME: The 6 participating states had various levels of success. Participating states formed and sustained viable interorganizational public health partnerships throughout the pilot program and beyond. INTERPRETATION: Although this innovative pilot faced many difficulties, participants overcame substantial obstacles and produced many key accomplishments. Team Up brought together 2 challenging public health strategies: the translation of evidence-based approaches to communities and populations, and partnerships among diverse people and organizations. Case study results suggest that using a mix of approaches can promote the transference of evidence from research into practice through local, regional, and national partnerships.
format Text
id pubmed-2879994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28799942010-06-18 Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening Breslau, Erica S. Rochester, Phyllis W. Saslow, Debbie Crocoll, Caroline E. Johnson, Lenora E. Vinson, Cynthia A. Prev Chronic Dis Community Case Study BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental agency collaborated with county-level public health counterparts from 6 states to address screening disparities in cervical and breast cancer in counties with the highest prevalence. This case study describes lessons learned from Team Up, a model pilot program. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative case study including 5 Southern states and 1 Midwestern state: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The 6 states underwent a 5-step process to adopt, adapt, and implement 1 of 3 evidence-based interventions designed for cervical and breast cancer screening. OUTCOME: The 6 participating states had various levels of success. Participating states formed and sustained viable interorganizational public health partnerships throughout the pilot program and beyond. INTERPRETATION: Although this innovative pilot faced many difficulties, participants overcame substantial obstacles and produced many key accomplishments. Team Up brought together 2 challenging public health strategies: the translation of evidence-based approaches to communities and populations, and partnerships among diverse people and organizations. Case study results suggest that using a mix of approaches can promote the transference of evidence from research into practice through local, regional, and national partnerships. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2879994/ /pubmed/20394701 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Community Case Study
Breslau, Erica S.
Rochester, Phyllis W.
Saslow, Debbie
Crocoll, Caroline E.
Johnson, Lenora E.
Vinson, Cynthia A.
Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title_full Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title_short Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
title_sort developing partnerships to reduce disparities in cancer screening
topic Community Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20394701
work_keys_str_mv AT breslauericas developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening
AT rochesterphyllisw developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening
AT saslowdebbie developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening
AT crocollcarolinee developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening
AT johnsonlenorae developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening
AT vinsoncynthiaa developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening