Cargando…
Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening
BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20394701 |
_version_ | 1782181980837773312 |
---|---|
author | Breslau, Erica S. Rochester, Phyllis W. Saslow, Debbie Crocoll, Caroline E. Johnson, Lenora E. Vinson, Cynthia A. |
author_facet | Breslau, Erica S. Rochester, Phyllis W. Saslow, Debbie Crocoll, Caroline E. Johnson, Lenora E. Vinson, Cynthia A. |
author_sort | Breslau, Erica S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental agency collaborated with county-level public health counterparts from 6 states to address screening disparities in cervical and breast cancer in counties with the highest prevalence. This case study describes lessons learned from Team Up, a model pilot program. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative case study including 5 Southern states and 1 Midwestern state: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The 6 states underwent a 5-step process to adopt, adapt, and implement 1 of 3 evidence-based interventions designed for cervical and breast cancer screening. OUTCOME: The 6 participating states had various levels of success. Participating states formed and sustained viable interorganizational public health partnerships throughout the pilot program and beyond. INTERPRETATION: Although this innovative pilot faced many difficulties, participants overcame substantial obstacles and produced many key accomplishments. Team Up brought together 2 challenging public health strategies: the translation of evidence-based approaches to communities and populations, and partnerships among diverse people and organizations. Case study results suggest that using a mix of approaches can promote the transference of evidence from research into practice through local, regional, and national partnerships. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2879994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28799942010-06-18 Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening Breslau, Erica S. Rochester, Phyllis W. Saslow, Debbie Crocoll, Caroline E. Johnson, Lenora E. Vinson, Cynthia A. Prev Chronic Dis Community Case Study BACKGROUND: Interventions in scientific settings to improve the well-being of women who are not regularly screened for cancer have failed. Consequently, community-based prevention and control efforts are needed. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: From 2003 through 2007, three federal agencies and 1 nongovernmental agency collaborated with county-level public health counterparts from 6 states to address screening disparities in cervical and breast cancer in counties with the highest prevalence. This case study describes lessons learned from Team Up, a model pilot program. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive qualitative case study including 5 Southern states and 1 Midwestern state: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, and Tennessee. The 6 states underwent a 5-step process to adopt, adapt, and implement 1 of 3 evidence-based interventions designed for cervical and breast cancer screening. OUTCOME: The 6 participating states had various levels of success. Participating states formed and sustained viable interorganizational public health partnerships throughout the pilot program and beyond. INTERPRETATION: Although this innovative pilot faced many difficulties, participants overcame substantial obstacles and produced many key accomplishments. Team Up brought together 2 challenging public health strategies: the translation of evidence-based approaches to communities and populations, and partnerships among diverse people and organizations. Case study results suggest that using a mix of approaches can promote the transference of evidence from research into practice through local, regional, and national partnerships. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2010-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2879994/ /pubmed/20394701 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Community Case Study Breslau, Erica S. Rochester, Phyllis W. Saslow, Debbie Crocoll, Caroline E. Johnson, Lenora E. Vinson, Cynthia A. Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title | Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title_full | Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title_fullStr | Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title_short | Developing Partnerships to Reduce Disparities in Cancer Screening |
title_sort | developing partnerships to reduce disparities in cancer screening |
topic | Community Case Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20394701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breslauericas developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening AT rochesterphyllisw developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening AT saslowdebbie developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening AT crocollcarolinee developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening AT johnsonlenorae developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening AT vinsoncynthiaa developingpartnershipstoreducedisparitiesincancerscreening |