Cargando…

Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail

BACKGROUND: In Alzheimer's disease (AD) research patients are usually recruited from clinical practice, memory clinics or nursing homes. Lack of standardised inclusion and diagnostic criteria is a major concern in current AD studies. The aim of the study was to explore whether patient character...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Fred, Engstad, Torgeir A, Straume, Bjørn, Viitanen, Matti, Halvorsen, Dag S, Hykkerud, Samuel, Sjøbrend, Kjell
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20429946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-35
_version_ 1782181992616427520
author Andersen, Fred
Engstad, Torgeir A
Straume, Bjørn
Viitanen, Matti
Halvorsen, Dag S
Hykkerud, Samuel
Sjøbrend, Kjell
author_facet Andersen, Fred
Engstad, Torgeir A
Straume, Bjørn
Viitanen, Matti
Halvorsen, Dag S
Hykkerud, Samuel
Sjøbrend, Kjell
author_sort Andersen, Fred
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Alzheimer's disease (AD) research patients are usually recruited from clinical practice, memory clinics or nursing homes. Lack of standardised inclusion and diagnostic criteria is a major concern in current AD studies. The aim of the study was to explore whether patient characteristics differ between study samples recruited from general practice and from a population based screening by mail within the same geographic areas in rural Northern Norway. METHODS: An interventional study in nine municipalities with 70000 inhabitants was designed. Patients were recruited from general practice or by population based screening of cognitive function by mail. We sent a questionnaire to 11807 individuals ≥ 65 years of age of whom 3767 responded. Among these, 438 individuals whose answers raised a suspicion of cognitive impairment were invited to an extended cognitive and clinical examination. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, independent sample t-test and analyses of covariance adjusted for possible confounders were used. RESULTS: The final study samples included 100 patients recruited by screening and 87 from general practice. Screening through mail recruited younger and more self-reliant male patients with a higher MMSE sum score, whereas older women with more severe cognitive impairment were recruited from general practice. Adjustment for age did not alter the statistically significant differences of cognitive function, self-reliance and gender distribution between patients recruited by screening and from general practice. CONCLUSIONS: Different recruitment procedures of individuals with cognitive impairment provided study samples with different demographic characteristics. Initial cognitive screening by mail, preceding extended cognitive testing and clinical examination may be a suitable recruitment strategy in studies of early stage AD. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT00443014
format Text
id pubmed-2880123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28801232010-06-03 Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail Andersen, Fred Engstad, Torgeir A Straume, Bjørn Viitanen, Matti Halvorsen, Dag S Hykkerud, Samuel Sjøbrend, Kjell BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In Alzheimer's disease (AD) research patients are usually recruited from clinical practice, memory clinics or nursing homes. Lack of standardised inclusion and diagnostic criteria is a major concern in current AD studies. The aim of the study was to explore whether patient characteristics differ between study samples recruited from general practice and from a population based screening by mail within the same geographic areas in rural Northern Norway. METHODS: An interventional study in nine municipalities with 70000 inhabitants was designed. Patients were recruited from general practice or by population based screening of cognitive function by mail. We sent a questionnaire to 11807 individuals ≥ 65 years of age of whom 3767 responded. Among these, 438 individuals whose answers raised a suspicion of cognitive impairment were invited to an extended cognitive and clinical examination. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, independent sample t-test and analyses of covariance adjusted for possible confounders were used. RESULTS: The final study samples included 100 patients recruited by screening and 87 from general practice. Screening through mail recruited younger and more self-reliant male patients with a higher MMSE sum score, whereas older women with more severe cognitive impairment were recruited from general practice. Adjustment for age did not alter the statistically significant differences of cognitive function, self-reliance and gender distribution between patients recruited by screening and from general practice. CONCLUSIONS: Different recruitment procedures of individuals with cognitive impairment provided study samples with different demographic characteristics. Initial cognitive screening by mail, preceding extended cognitive testing and clinical examination may be a suitable recruitment strategy in studies of early stage AD. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT00443014 BioMed Central 2010-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2880123/ /pubmed/20429946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-35 Text en Copyright ©2010 Andersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andersen, Fred
Engstad, Torgeir A
Straume, Bjørn
Viitanen, Matti
Halvorsen, Dag S
Hykkerud, Samuel
Sjøbrend, Kjell
Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title_full Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title_fullStr Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title_short Recruitment methods in Alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
title_sort recruitment methods in alzheimer's disease research: general practice versus population based screening by mail
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20429946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-35
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenfred recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT engstadtorgeira recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT straumebjørn recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT viitanenmatti recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT halvorsendags recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT hykkerudsamuel recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail
AT sjøbrendkjell recruitmentmethodsinalzheimersdiseaseresearchgeneralpracticeversuspopulationbasedscreeningbymail