Cargando…

Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The risk of breast cancer to first degree relatives of breast cancer patients is approximately twice that of the general population. Breast cancer, however, is a heterogeneous disease and it is plausible that the familial relative risk (FRR) for breast cancer may differ by the patholog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavaddat, Nasim, Pharoah, Paul D, Blows, Fiona, Driver, Kristy E, Provenzano, Elena, Thompson, Deborah, MacInnis, Robert J, Shah, Mitul, Easton, Douglas F, Antoniou, Antonis C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2476
_version_ 1782182029616480256
author Mavaddat, Nasim
Pharoah, Paul D
Blows, Fiona
Driver, Kristy E
Provenzano, Elena
Thompson, Deborah
MacInnis, Robert J
Shah, Mitul
Easton, Douglas F
Antoniou, Antonis C
author_facet Mavaddat, Nasim
Pharoah, Paul D
Blows, Fiona
Driver, Kristy E
Provenzano, Elena
Thompson, Deborah
MacInnis, Robert J
Shah, Mitul
Easton, Douglas F
Antoniou, Antonis C
author_sort Mavaddat, Nasim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The risk of breast cancer to first degree relatives of breast cancer patients is approximately twice that of the general population. Breast cancer, however, is a heterogeneous disease and it is plausible that the familial relative risk (FRR) for breast cancer may differ by the pathological subtype of the tumour. The contribution of genetic variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility to the subtype-specific FRR is still unclear. METHODS: We computed breast cancer FRR for subtypes of breast cancer by comparing breast cancer incidence in relatives of breast cancer cases from a population-based series with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status with that expected from the general population. We estimated the contribution to the FRR of genetic variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility using subtype-specific genotypic relative risks and allele frequencies for each variant. RESULTS: At least one marker was measured for 4,590 breast cancer cases, who reported 9,014 affected and unaffected first-degree female relatives. There was no difference between the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative (FRR = 1.78, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.44 to 2.11) and ER-positive disease (1.82, 95% CI: 1.67 to 1.98), P = 0.99. There was some suggestion that the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative disease was higher than that for ER-positive disease for ages of the relative less than 50 years old (FRR = 2.96, 95% CI: 2.04 to 3.87; and 2.05, 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.40 respectively; P = 0.07), and that the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-positive disease was higher than for ER-negative disease when the age of the relative was greater than 50 years (FRR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.93; and 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.74 respectively, P = 0.06). We estimated that mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain 32% of breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative and 9.4% of the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-positive disease. Twelve recently identified common breast cancer susceptibility variants were estimated to explain 1.9% and 9.6% of the FRR to relatives of patients with ER-negative and ER-positive disease respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FRR for breast cancer was significantly increased for both ER-negative and ER-positive disease. Including receptor status in conjunction with genetic status may aid risk prediction in women with a family history.
format Text
id pubmed-2880431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28804312010-06-04 Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study Mavaddat, Nasim Pharoah, Paul D Blows, Fiona Driver, Kristy E Provenzano, Elena Thompson, Deborah MacInnis, Robert J Shah, Mitul Easton, Douglas F Antoniou, Antonis C Breast Cancer Res Research article INTRODUCTION: The risk of breast cancer to first degree relatives of breast cancer patients is approximately twice that of the general population. Breast cancer, however, is a heterogeneous disease and it is plausible that the familial relative risk (FRR) for breast cancer may differ by the pathological subtype of the tumour. The contribution of genetic variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility to the subtype-specific FRR is still unclear. METHODS: We computed breast cancer FRR for subtypes of breast cancer by comparing breast cancer incidence in relatives of breast cancer cases from a population-based series with known estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status with that expected from the general population. We estimated the contribution to the FRR of genetic variants associated with breast cancer susceptibility using subtype-specific genotypic relative risks and allele frequencies for each variant. RESULTS: At least one marker was measured for 4,590 breast cancer cases, who reported 9,014 affected and unaffected first-degree female relatives. There was no difference between the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative (FRR = 1.78, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.44 to 2.11) and ER-positive disease (1.82, 95% CI: 1.67 to 1.98), P = 0.99. There was some suggestion that the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative disease was higher than that for ER-positive disease for ages of the relative less than 50 years old (FRR = 2.96, 95% CI: 2.04 to 3.87; and 2.05, 95% CI: 1.70 to 2.40 respectively; P = 0.07), and that the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-positive disease was higher than for ER-negative disease when the age of the relative was greater than 50 years (FRR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.93; and 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.74 respectively, P = 0.06). We estimated that mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain 32% of breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-negative and 9.4% of the breast cancer FRR for relatives of patients with ER-positive disease. Twelve recently identified common breast cancer susceptibility variants were estimated to explain 1.9% and 9.6% of the FRR to relatives of patients with ER-negative and ER-positive disease respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FRR for breast cancer was significantly increased for both ER-negative and ER-positive disease. Including receptor status in conjunction with genetic status may aid risk prediction in women with a family history. BioMed Central 2010 2010-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2880431/ /pubmed/20146796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2476 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mavaddat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Mavaddat, Nasim
Pharoah, Paul D
Blows, Fiona
Driver, Kristy E
Provenzano, Elena
Thompson, Deborah
MacInnis, Robert J
Shah, Mitul
Easton, Douglas F
Antoniou, Antonis C
Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title_full Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title_short Familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
title_sort familial relative risks for breast cancer by pathological subtype: a population-based cohort study
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr2476
work_keys_str_mv AT mavaddatnasim familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT pharoahpauld familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT blowsfiona familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT driverkristye familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT provenzanoelena familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT thompsondeborah familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT macinnisrobertj familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT shahmitul familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT eastondouglasf familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT antoniouantonisc familialrelativerisksforbreastcancerbypathologicalsubtypeapopulationbasedcohortstudy