Cargando…

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bow, Simon, Klassen, Jeffrey, Chisholm, Annabritt, Tjosvold, Lisa, Thomson, Denise, Klassen, Terry P, Moher, David, Hartling, Lisa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34
_version_ 1782182089410478080
author Bow, Simon
Klassen, Jeffrey
Chisholm, Annabritt
Tjosvold, Lisa
Thomson, Denise
Klassen, Terry P
Moher, David
Hartling, Lisa
author_facet Bow, Simon
Klassen, Jeffrey
Chisholm, Annabritt
Tjosvold, Lisa
Thomson, Denise
Klassen, Terry P
Moher, David
Hartling, Lisa
author_sort Bow, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009). METHODS: SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area. RESULTS: The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data.
format Text
id pubmed-2881081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28810812010-06-05 A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Bow, Simon Klassen, Jeffrey Chisholm, Annabritt Tjosvold, Lisa Thomson, Denise Klassen, Terry P Moher, David Hartling, Lisa BMC Pediatr Research article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009). METHODS: SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area. RESULTS: The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data. BioMed Central 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2881081/ /pubmed/20487565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bow et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research article
Bow, Simon
Klassen, Jeffrey
Chisholm, Annabritt
Tjosvold, Lisa
Thomson, Denise
Klassen, Terry P
Moher, David
Hartling, Lisa
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title_full A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title_short A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
title_sort descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the cochrane database of systematic reviews
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34
work_keys_str_mv AT bowsimon adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT klassenjeffrey adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT chisholmannabritt adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT tjosvoldlisa adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT thomsondenise adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT klassenterryp adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT moherdavid adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT hartlinglisa adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT bowsimon descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT klassenjeffrey descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT chisholmannabritt descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT tjosvoldlisa descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT thomsondenise descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT klassenterryp descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT moherdavid descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews
AT hartlinglisa descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews