Cargando…
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34 |
_version_ | 1782182089410478080 |
---|---|
author | Bow, Simon Klassen, Jeffrey Chisholm, Annabritt Tjosvold, Lisa Thomson, Denise Klassen, Terry P Moher, David Hartling, Lisa |
author_facet | Bow, Simon Klassen, Jeffrey Chisholm, Annabritt Tjosvold, Lisa Thomson, Denise Klassen, Terry P Moher, David Hartling, Lisa |
author_sort | Bow, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009). METHODS: SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area. RESULTS: The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2881081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28810812010-06-05 A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Bow, Simon Klassen, Jeffrey Chisholm, Annabritt Tjosvold, Lisa Thomson, Denise Klassen, Terry P Moher, David Hartling, Lisa BMC Pediatr Research article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered an important tool for decision-making. There has been no recent comprehensive identification or description of child-relevant SRs. A description of existing child-relevant SRs would help to identify the extent of available child-relevant evidence available in SRs and gaps in the evidence base where SRs are required. The objective of this study was to describe child-relevant SRs from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR, Issue 2, 2009). METHODS: SRs were assessed for relevance using pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and entered into an electronic form. Univariate analyses were performed to describe the SRs overall and by topic area. RESULTS: The search yielded 1666 SRs; 793 met the inclusion criteria. 38% of SRs were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2007. Corresponding authors were most often from the UK (41%). Most SRs (59%) examined pharmacological interventions. 53% had at least one external source of funding. SRs included a median of 7 studies (IQR 3, 15) and 679 participants (IQR 179, 2833). Of all studies, 48% included only children, and 27% only adults. 94% of studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Primary outcomes were specified in 72% of SRs. Allocation concealment and the Jadad scale were used in 97% and 25% of SRs, respectively. Adults and children were analyzed separately in 12% of SRs and as a subgroup analysis in 14%. Publication bias was assessed in only 14% of SRs. A meta-analysis was conducted in 68% of SRs with a median of 5 trials (IQR 3, 9) each. Variations in these characteristics were observed across topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: We described the methodological characteristics and rigour of child-relevant reviews in the CDSR. Many SRs are not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria. Our study describes variation in conduct and reporting across SRs and reveals clinicians' ability to access child-specific data. BioMed Central 2010-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2881081/ /pubmed/20487565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bow et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research article Bow, Simon Klassen, Jeffrey Chisholm, Annabritt Tjosvold, Lisa Thomson, Denise Klassen, Terry P Moher, David Hartling, Lisa A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title | A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title_full | A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title_fullStr | A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title_short | A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
title_sort | descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the cochrane database of systematic reviews |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20487565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowsimon adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT klassenjeffrey adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT chisholmannabritt adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT tjosvoldlisa adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT thomsondenise adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT klassenterryp adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT moherdavid adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT hartlinglisa adescriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT bowsimon descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT klassenjeffrey descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT chisholmannabritt descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT tjosvoldlisa descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT thomsondenise descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT klassenterryp descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT moherdavid descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews AT hartlinglisa descriptiveanalysisofchildrelevantsystematicreviewsinthecochranedatabaseofsystematicreviews |