Cargando…
A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection
Motivation: The medical imaging and image processing techniques, ranging from microscopic to macroscopic, has become one of the main components of diagnostic procedures to assist dermatologists in their medical decision-making processes. Computer-aided segmentation and border detection on dermoscopi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq178 |
_version_ | 1782182106795868160 |
---|---|
author | Kockara, Sinan Mete, Mutlu Yip, Vincent Lee, Brendan Aydin, Kemal |
author_facet | Kockara, Sinan Mete, Mutlu Yip, Vincent Lee, Brendan Aydin, Kemal |
author_sort | Kockara, Sinan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation: The medical imaging and image processing techniques, ranging from microscopic to macroscopic, has become one of the main components of diagnostic procedures to assist dermatologists in their medical decision-making processes. Computer-aided segmentation and border detection on dermoscopic images is one of the core components of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions for skin cancer. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopic images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer variations in human interpretations. In this study, a novel approach—graph spanner—for automatic border detection in dermoscopic images is proposed. In this approach, a proximity graph representation of dermoscopic images in order to detect regions and borders in skin lesion is presented. Results: Graph spanner approach is examined on a set of 100 dermoscopic images whose manually drawn borders by a dermatologist are used as the ground truth. Error rates, false positives and false negatives along with true positives and true negatives are quantified by digitally comparing results with manually determined borders from a dermatologist. The results show that the highest precision and recall rates obtained to determine lesion boundaries are 100%. However, accuracy of assessment averages out at 97.72% and borders errors' mean is 2.28% for whole dataset. Contact: skockara@uca.edu |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2881363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28813632010-06-08 A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection Kockara, Sinan Mete, Mutlu Yip, Vincent Lee, Brendan Aydin, Kemal Bioinformatics Ismb 2010 Conference Proceedings July 11 to July 13, 2010, Boston, Ma, Usa Motivation: The medical imaging and image processing techniques, ranging from microscopic to macroscopic, has become one of the main components of diagnostic procedures to assist dermatologists in their medical decision-making processes. Computer-aided segmentation and border detection on dermoscopic images is one of the core components of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions for skin cancer. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopic images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer variations in human interpretations. In this study, a novel approach—graph spanner—for automatic border detection in dermoscopic images is proposed. In this approach, a proximity graph representation of dermoscopic images in order to detect regions and borders in skin lesion is presented. Results: Graph spanner approach is examined on a set of 100 dermoscopic images whose manually drawn borders by a dermatologist are used as the ground truth. Error rates, false positives and false negatives along with true positives and true negatives are quantified by digitally comparing results with manually determined borders from a dermatologist. The results show that the highest precision and recall rates obtained to determine lesion boundaries are 100%. However, accuracy of assessment averages out at 97.72% and borders errors' mean is 2.28% for whole dataset. Contact: skockara@uca.edu Oxford University Press 2010-06-15 2010-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2881363/ /pubmed/20529909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq178 Text en © The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Ismb 2010 Conference Proceedings July 11 to July 13, 2010, Boston, Ma, Usa Kockara, Sinan Mete, Mutlu Yip, Vincent Lee, Brendan Aydin, Kemal A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title | A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title_full | A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title_fullStr | A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title_full_unstemmed | A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title_short | A soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
title_sort | soft kinetic data structure for lesion border detection |
topic | Ismb 2010 Conference Proceedings July 11 to July 13, 2010, Boston, Ma, Usa |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2881363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kockarasinan asoftkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT metemutlu asoftkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT yipvincent asoftkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT leebrendan asoftkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT aydinkemal asoftkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT kockarasinan softkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT metemutlu softkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT yipvincent softkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT leebrendan softkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection AT aydinkemal softkineticdatastructureforlesionborderdetection |