Cargando…
Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis
OBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate profiles of US and CT features associated with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department were invited to participate in this study. All patients underwent US and CT. Imaging features known t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20119730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1706-x |
_version_ | 1782182158937358336 |
---|---|
author | van Randen, A. Laméris, W. van Es, H. W. ten Hove, W. Bouma, W. H. van Leeuwen, M. S. van Keulen, E. M. van der Hulst, V. P. M. Henneman, O. D. Bossuyt, P. M. Boermeester, M. A. Stoker, J. |
author_facet | van Randen, A. Laméris, W. van Es, H. W. ten Hove, W. Bouma, W. H. van Leeuwen, M. S. van Keulen, E. M. van der Hulst, V. P. M. Henneman, O. D. Bossuyt, P. M. Boermeester, M. A. Stoker, J. |
author_sort | van Randen, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate profiles of US and CT features associated with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department were invited to participate in this study. All patients underwent US and CT. Imaging features known to be associated with appendicitis, and an imaging diagnosis were prospectively recorded by two independent radiologists. A final diagnosis was assigned after 6 months. Associations between appendiceal imaging features and a final diagnosis of appendicitis were evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Appendicitis was assigned to 284 of 942 evaluated patients (30%). All evaluated features were associated with appendicitis. Imaging profiles were created after multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of 147 patients with a thickened appendix, local transducer tenderness and peri-appendiceal fat infiltration on US, 139 (95%) had appendicitis. On CT, 119 patients in whom the appendix was completely visualised, thickened, with peri-appendiceal fat infiltration and appendiceal enhancement, 114 had a final diagnosis of appendicitis (96%). When at least two of these essential features were present on US or CT, sensitivity was 92% (95% CI 89–96%) and 96% (95% CI 93–98%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Most patients with appendicitis can be categorised within a few imaging profiles on US and CT. When two of the essential features are present the diagnosis of appendicitis can be made accurately. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2882051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28820512010-06-10 Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis van Randen, A. Laméris, W. van Es, H. W. ten Hove, W. Bouma, W. H. van Leeuwen, M. S. van Keulen, E. M. van der Hulst, V. P. M. Henneman, O. D. Bossuyt, P. M. Boermeester, M. A. Stoker, J. Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVES: To identify and evaluate profiles of US and CT features associated with acute appendicitis. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department were invited to participate in this study. All patients underwent US and CT. Imaging features known to be associated with appendicitis, and an imaging diagnosis were prospectively recorded by two independent radiologists. A final diagnosis was assigned after 6 months. Associations between appendiceal imaging features and a final diagnosis of appendicitis were evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Appendicitis was assigned to 284 of 942 evaluated patients (30%). All evaluated features were associated with appendicitis. Imaging profiles were created after multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of 147 patients with a thickened appendix, local transducer tenderness and peri-appendiceal fat infiltration on US, 139 (95%) had appendicitis. On CT, 119 patients in whom the appendix was completely visualised, thickened, with peri-appendiceal fat infiltration and appendiceal enhancement, 114 had a final diagnosis of appendicitis (96%). When at least two of these essential features were present on US or CT, sensitivity was 92% (95% CI 89–96%) and 96% (95% CI 93–98%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Most patients with appendicitis can be categorised within a few imaging profiles on US and CT. When two of the essential features are present the diagnosis of appendicitis can be made accurately. Springer-Verlag 2010-01-30 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2882051/ /pubmed/20119730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1706-x Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal van Randen, A. Laméris, W. van Es, H. W. ten Hove, W. Bouma, W. H. van Leeuwen, M. S. van Keulen, E. M. van der Hulst, V. P. M. Henneman, O. D. Bossuyt, P. M. Boermeester, M. A. Stoker, J. Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title | Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title_full | Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title_fullStr | Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title_short | Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
title_sort | profiles of us and ct imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis |
topic | Gastrointestinal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20119730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1706-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrandena profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT lamerisw profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT vaneshw profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT tenhovew profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT boumawh profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT vanleeuwenms profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT vankeulenem profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT vanderhulstvpm profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT hennemanod profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT bossuytpm profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT boermeesterma profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis AT stokerj profilesofusandctimagingfeatureswithahighprobabilityofappendicitis |