Cargando…

Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that had previously undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK) using the ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: We recruited 26 patients who had received unilateral PK. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Joo Young, Choi, Jin Seok, Oh, Joo Youn, Kim, Mee Kum, Lee, Jin Hak, Wee, Won Ryang
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.3.139
_version_ 1782182159648292864
author Shin, Joo Young
Choi, Jin Seok
Oh, Joo Youn
Kim, Mee Kum
Lee, Jin Hak
Wee, Won Ryang
author_facet Shin, Joo Young
Choi, Jin Seok
Oh, Joo Youn
Kim, Mee Kum
Lee, Jin Hak
Wee, Won Ryang
author_sort Shin, Joo Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that had previously undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK) using the ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: We recruited 26 patients who had received unilateral PK. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured with the ORA and were compared to the measurements from the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK. RESULTS: The CH was 8.95±2.59 mmHg in eyes that underwent PK and 9.78±1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK (p=0.077). The CRF was 10.26±2.64 mmHg in post-PK eyes and 9.75±1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes (p=0.509), and the CH-CRF was significantly smaller in post-PK eyes (-1.31±2.32 mmHg in post-PK eyes vs. 0.03±0.88 mmHg in fellow eyes, p=0.016). The IOPg and IOPcc were significantly higher in the PK group than they were in the control group. The IOPcc's were 20.81±7.81 mmHg and 16.27±2.49 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.011); and the IOPg's were 19.22±7.34 mmHg and 15.07±3.03 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.019). The IOPcc-g's were 1.59±2.81 mmHg and 1.21±1.30 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.412), and the central corneal thickness (CCT)'s were 489.11±90.60 µm and 556.24±42.84 µm in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Following PK, CH tended to decrease while CRF tended to increase, significantly decreasing CH-CRF. A significantly higher intraocular pressure and a thinner CCT following PK may have contributed to the observed changes in these corneal biomechanical parameters.
format Text
id pubmed-2882075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28820752010-06-08 Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer Shin, Joo Young Choi, Jin Seok Oh, Joo Youn Kim, Mee Kum Lee, Jin Hak Wee, Won Ryang Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that had previously undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK) using the ocular response analyzer (ORA). METHODS: We recruited 26 patients who had received unilateral PK. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured with the ORA and were compared to the measurements from the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK. RESULTS: The CH was 8.95±2.59 mmHg in eyes that underwent PK and 9.78±1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK (p=0.077). The CRF was 10.26±2.64 mmHg in post-PK eyes and 9.75±1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes (p=0.509), and the CH-CRF was significantly smaller in post-PK eyes (-1.31±2.32 mmHg in post-PK eyes vs. 0.03±0.88 mmHg in fellow eyes, p=0.016). The IOPg and IOPcc were significantly higher in the PK group than they were in the control group. The IOPcc's were 20.81±7.81 mmHg and 16.27±2.49 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.011); and the IOPg's were 19.22±7.34 mmHg and 15.07±3.03 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.019). The IOPcc-g's were 1.59±2.81 mmHg and 1.21±1.30 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.412), and the central corneal thickness (CCT)'s were 489.11±90.60 µm and 556.24±42.84 µm in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.068). CONCLUSIONS: Following PK, CH tended to decrease while CRF tended to increase, significantly decreasing CH-CRF. A significantly higher intraocular pressure and a thinner CCT following PK may have contributed to the observed changes in these corneal biomechanical parameters. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2010-06 2010-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2882075/ /pubmed/20532138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.3.139 Text en © 2010 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Joo Young
Choi, Jin Seok
Oh, Joo Youn
Kim, Mee Kum
Lee, Jin Hak
Wee, Won Ryang
Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title_full Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title_fullStr Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title_short Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following Penetrating Keratoplasty Using the Ocular Response Analyzer
title_sort evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20532138
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.3.139
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjooyoung evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer
AT choijinseok evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer
AT ohjooyoun evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer
AT kimmeekum evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer
AT leejinhak evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer
AT weewonryang evaluationofcornealbiomechanicalpropertiesfollowingpenetratingkeratoplastyusingtheocularresponseanalyzer