Cargando…
Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583 |
_version_ | 1782182228850114560 |
---|---|
author | Carmichael, David W Thornton, John S Rodionov, Roman Thornton, Rachel McEvoy, Andrew Allen, Philip J Lemieux, Louis |
author_facet | Carmichael, David W Thornton, John S Rodionov, Roman Thornton, Rachel McEvoy, Andrew Allen, Philip J Lemieux, Louis |
author_sort | Carmichael, David W |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head- and body-transmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a “standard” condition with external electrode-leads physically separated and a “fault” condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. RESULTS: Using a head-transmit–receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (<1°C). Under “standard” conditions, we observed greater heating (≤2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the “fault” condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body-average) at the grid electrode under “standard” conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. CONCLUSION: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head-transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1233–1244. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2883075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28830752010-06-15 Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating Carmichael, David W Thornton, John S Rodionov, Roman Thornton, Rachel McEvoy, Andrew Allen, Philip J Lemieux, Louis J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head- and body-transmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a “standard” condition with external electrode-leads physically separated and a “fault” condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. RESULTS: Using a head-transmit–receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (<1°C). Under “standard” conditions, we observed greater heating (≤2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the “fault” condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body-average) at the grid electrode under “standard” conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. CONCLUSION: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head-transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1233–1244. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2008-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2883075/ /pubmed/18972332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583 Text en Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Carmichael, David W Thornton, John S Rodionov, Roman Thornton, Rachel McEvoy, Andrew Allen, Philip J Lemieux, Louis Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title | Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title_full | Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title_fullStr | Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title_short | Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating |
title_sort | safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using mri: radiofrequency-induced heating |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carmichaeldavidw safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT thorntonjohns safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT rodionovroman safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT thorntonrachel safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT mcevoyandrew safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT allenphilipj safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating AT lemieuxlouis safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating |