Cargando…

Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating

PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carmichael, David W, Thornton, John S, Rodionov, Roman, Thornton, Rachel, McEvoy, Andrew, Allen, Philip J, Lemieux, Louis
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583
_version_ 1782182228850114560
author Carmichael, David W
Thornton, John S
Rodionov, Roman
Thornton, Rachel
McEvoy, Andrew
Allen, Philip J
Lemieux, Louis
author_facet Carmichael, David W
Thornton, John S
Rodionov, Roman
Thornton, Rachel
McEvoy, Andrew
Allen, Philip J
Lemieux, Louis
author_sort Carmichael, David W
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head- and body-transmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a “standard” condition with external electrode-leads physically separated and a “fault” condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. RESULTS: Using a head-transmit–receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (<1°C). Under “standard” conditions, we observed greater heating (≤2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the “fault” condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body-average) at the grid electrode under “standard” conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. CONCLUSION: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head-transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1233–1244. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
format Text
id pubmed-2883075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28830752010-06-15 Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating Carmichael, David W Thornton, John S Rodionov, Roman Thornton, Rachel McEvoy, Andrew Allen, Philip J Lemieux, Louis J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head- and body-transmit RF-coils. Two electrode-lead configurations were assessed: a “standard” condition with external electrode-leads physically separated and a “fault” condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. RESULTS: Using a head-transmit–receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head-average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (<1°C). Under “standard” conditions, we observed greater heating (≤2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the “fault” condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body-transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body-average) at the grid electrode under “standard” conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. CONCLUSION: MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head-transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner-reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1233–1244. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2008-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2883075/ /pubmed/18972332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583 Text en Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carmichael, David W
Thornton, John S
Rodionov, Roman
Thornton, Rachel
McEvoy, Andrew
Allen, Philip J
Lemieux, Louis
Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title_full Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title_fullStr Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title_full_unstemmed Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title_short Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating
title_sort safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using mri: radiofrequency-induced heating
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21583
work_keys_str_mv AT carmichaeldavidw safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT thorntonjohns safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT rodionovroman safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT thorntonrachel safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT mcevoyandrew safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT allenphilipj safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating
AT lemieuxlouis safetyoflocalizingepilepsymonitoringintracranialelectroencephalographelectrodesusingmriradiofrequencyinducedheating