Cargando…

Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis

We performed case–control analyses using data from the North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study to determine risk factors that distinguish primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our risk factor analyses were restricted to invasive serous cancers including 495 EOC cases, 62...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Delores J., Moorman, Patricia G., Akushevich, Lucy, Palmieri, Rachel T., Bentley, Rex C., Schildkraut, Joellen M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20309725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9525-6
_version_ 1782182233220579328
author Grant, Delores J.
Moorman, Patricia G.
Akushevich, Lucy
Palmieri, Rachel T.
Bentley, Rex C.
Schildkraut, Joellen M.
author_facet Grant, Delores J.
Moorman, Patricia G.
Akushevich, Lucy
Palmieri, Rachel T.
Bentley, Rex C.
Schildkraut, Joellen M.
author_sort Grant, Delores J.
collection PubMed
description We performed case–control analyses using data from the North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study to determine risk factors that distinguish primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our risk factor analyses were restricted to invasive serous cancers including 495 EOC cases, 62 PPC cases and 1,086 control women. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk factor associations. Although many case–control associations for the invasive serous PPC cases were similar to those of the invasive serous EOC cases, some differences were observed including a twofold increase in risk of invasive serous PPC in women who were ≥35 years at last pregnancy, whereas a decreased risk was observed for invasive serous EOC risk. We could not confirm a previous report of an association between tubal ligation and PPC, a factor consistently associated with a decreased risk of EOC. The difference in the risk factor associations between invasive serous PPC and EOC cancers suggests divergent molecular development of peritoneal and ovarian cancers. A larger study to determine risk factors for invasive serous PPC is warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-2883093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28830932010-06-21 Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis Grant, Delores J. Moorman, Patricia G. Akushevich, Lucy Palmieri, Rachel T. Bentley, Rex C. Schildkraut, Joellen M. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper We performed case–control analyses using data from the North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study to determine risk factors that distinguish primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our risk factor analyses were restricted to invasive serous cancers including 495 EOC cases, 62 PPC cases and 1,086 control women. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk factor associations. Although many case–control associations for the invasive serous PPC cases were similar to those of the invasive serous EOC cases, some differences were observed including a twofold increase in risk of invasive serous PPC in women who were ≥35 years at last pregnancy, whereas a decreased risk was observed for invasive serous EOC risk. We could not confirm a previous report of an association between tubal ligation and PPC, a factor consistently associated with a decreased risk of EOC. The difference in the risk factor associations between invasive serous PPC and EOC cancers suggests divergent molecular development of peritoneal and ovarian cancers. A larger study to determine risk factors for invasive serous PPC is warranted. Springer Netherlands 2010-03-23 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2883093/ /pubmed/20309725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9525-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Grant, Delores J.
Moorman, Patricia G.
Akushevich, Lucy
Palmieri, Rachel T.
Bentley, Rex C.
Schildkraut, Joellen M.
Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title_full Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title_fullStr Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title_short Primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
title_sort primary peritoneal and ovarian cancers: an epidemiological comparative analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20309725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9525-6
work_keys_str_mv AT grantdeloresj primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis
AT moormanpatriciag primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis
AT akushevichlucy primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis
AT palmierirachelt primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis
AT bentleyrexc primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis
AT schildkrautjoellenm primaryperitonealandovariancancersanepidemiologicalcomparativeanalysis