Cargando…

A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)

As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keihaninejad, Shiva, Heckemann, Rolf A., Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo, Symms, Mark R., Hajnal, Joseph V., Hammers, Alexander
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20114082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064
_version_ 1782182234974846976
author Keihaninejad, Shiva
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo
Symms, Mark R.
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Hammers, Alexander
author_facet Keihaninejad, Shiva
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo
Symms, Mark R.
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Hammers, Alexander
author_sort Keihaninejad, Shiva
collection PubMed
description As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy subjects (n = 5) that had been imaged using 1.5T and 3T scanners, and confirmed in two independent cohorts. This was related to systematic differences in the intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with higher intensities for CSF located in the ventricles compared with CSF in the cisterns, at 3T versus 1.5T, which could not be removed with three different applied bias correction algorithms. We developed a method based on tissue probability maps in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space and reverse normalization (reverse brain mask, RBM) and validated it against manual ICV measurements. We also compared it with alternative automated ICV estimation methods based on Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM5) and Brain Extraction Tool (FSL). The proposed RBM method was equivalent to manual ICV normalization with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.99) and reliable across different field strengths. RBM achieved the best combination of precision and reliability in a group of healthy subjects, a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and can be used as a common normalization framework.
format Text
id pubmed-2883144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28831442010-07-09 A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) Keihaninejad, Shiva Heckemann, Rolf A. Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo Symms, Mark R. Hajnal, Joseph V. Hammers, Alexander Neuroimage Technical Note As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy subjects (n = 5) that had been imaged using 1.5T and 3T scanners, and confirmed in two independent cohorts. This was related to systematic differences in the intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with higher intensities for CSF located in the ventricles compared with CSF in the cisterns, at 3T versus 1.5T, which could not be removed with three different applied bias correction algorithms. We developed a method based on tissue probability maps in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space and reverse normalization (reverse brain mask, RBM) and validated it against manual ICV measurements. We also compared it with alternative automated ICV estimation methods based on Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM5) and Brain Extraction Tool (FSL). The proposed RBM method was equivalent to manual ICV normalization with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.99) and reliable across different field strengths. RBM achieved the best combination of precision and reliability in a group of healthy subjects, a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and can be used as a common normalization framework. Academic Press 2010-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2883144/ /pubmed/20114082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Technical Note
Keihaninejad, Shiva
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo
Symms, Mark R.
Hajnal, Joseph V.
Hammers, Alexander
A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title_full A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title_fullStr A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title_full_unstemmed A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title_short A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
title_sort robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across mri field strengths (1.5t and 3t)
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20114082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064
work_keys_str_mv AT keihaninejadshiva arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT heckemannrolfa arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT fagiologianlorenzo arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT symmsmarkr arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT hajnaljosephv arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT hammersalexander arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT keihaninejadshiva robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT heckemannrolfa robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT fagiologianlorenzo robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT symmsmarkr robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT hajnaljosephv robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT hammersalexander robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t
AT robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t