Cargando…
A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T)
As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20114082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064 |
_version_ | 1782182234974846976 |
---|---|
author | Keihaninejad, Shiva Heckemann, Rolf A. Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo Symms, Mark R. Hajnal, Joseph V. Hammers, Alexander |
author_facet | Keihaninejad, Shiva Heckemann, Rolf A. Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo Symms, Mark R. Hajnal, Joseph V. Hammers, Alexander |
author_sort | Keihaninejad, Shiva |
collection | PubMed |
description | As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy subjects (n = 5) that had been imaged using 1.5T and 3T scanners, and confirmed in two independent cohorts. This was related to systematic differences in the intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with higher intensities for CSF located in the ventricles compared with CSF in the cisterns, at 3T versus 1.5T, which could not be removed with three different applied bias correction algorithms. We developed a method based on tissue probability maps in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space and reverse normalization (reverse brain mask, RBM) and validated it against manual ICV measurements. We also compared it with alternative automated ICV estimation methods based on Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM5) and Brain Extraction Tool (FSL). The proposed RBM method was equivalent to manual ICV normalization with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.99) and reliable across different field strengths. RBM achieved the best combination of precision and reliability in a group of healthy subjects, a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and can be used as a common normalization framework. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2883144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28831442010-07-09 A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) Keihaninejad, Shiva Heckemann, Rolf A. Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo Symms, Mark R. Hajnal, Joseph V. Hammers, Alexander Neuroimage Technical Note As population-based studies may obtain images from scanners with different field strengths, a method to normalize regional brain volumes according to intracranial volume (ICV) independent of field strength is needed. We found systematic differences in ICV estimation, tested in a cohort of healthy subjects (n = 5) that had been imaged using 1.5T and 3T scanners, and confirmed in two independent cohorts. This was related to systematic differences in the intensity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with higher intensities for CSF located in the ventricles compared with CSF in the cisterns, at 3T versus 1.5T, which could not be removed with three different applied bias correction algorithms. We developed a method based on tissue probability maps in MNI (Montreal Neurological Institute) space and reverse normalization (reverse brain mask, RBM) and validated it against manual ICV measurements. We also compared it with alternative automated ICV estimation methods based on Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM5) and Brain Extraction Tool (FSL). The proposed RBM method was equivalent to manual ICV normalization with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.99) and reliable across different field strengths. RBM achieved the best combination of precision and reliability in a group of healthy subjects, a group of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and can be used as a common normalization framework. Academic Press 2010-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2883144/ /pubmed/20114082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Keihaninejad, Shiva Heckemann, Rolf A. Fagiolo, Gianlorenzo Symms, Mark R. Hajnal, Joseph V. Hammers, Alexander A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title | A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title_full | A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title_fullStr | A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title_full_unstemmed | A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title_short | A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) |
title_sort | robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across mri field strengths (1.5t and 3t) |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20114082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keihaninejadshiva arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT heckemannrolfa arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT fagiologianlorenzo arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT symmsmarkr arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT hajnaljosephv arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT hammersalexander arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT arobustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT keihaninejadshiva robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT heckemannrolfa robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT fagiologianlorenzo robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT symmsmarkr robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT hajnaljosephv robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT hammersalexander robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t AT robustmethodtoestimatetheintracranialvolumeacrossmrifieldstrengths15tand3t |