Cargando…
Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567632 |
_version_ | 1782182250207510528 |
---|---|
author | Taneja, Pankaj Maglic, Dejan Kai, Fumitake Zhu, Sinan Kendig, Robert D. Fry, Elizabeth A. Inoue, Kazushi |
author_facet | Taneja, Pankaj Maglic, Dejan Kai, Fumitake Zhu, Sinan Kendig, Robert D. Fry, Elizabeth A. Inoue, Kazushi |
author_sort | Taneja, Pankaj |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14(ARF), TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2883240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28832402010-06-21 Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance Taneja, Pankaj Maglic, Dejan Kai, Fumitake Zhu, Sinan Kendig, Robert D. Fry, Elizabeth A. Inoue, Kazushi Clin Med Insights Oncol Review The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14(ARF), TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits. Libertas Academica 2010-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2883240/ /pubmed/20567632 Text en © 2010 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Taneja, Pankaj Maglic, Dejan Kai, Fumitake Zhu, Sinan Kendig, Robert D. Fry, Elizabeth A. Inoue, Kazushi Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title | Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title_full | Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title_fullStr | Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title_full_unstemmed | Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title_short | Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance |
title_sort | classical and novel prognostic markers for breast cancer and their clinical significance |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanejapankaj classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT maglicdejan classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT kaifumitake classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT zhusinan classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT kendigrobertd classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT fryelizabetha classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance AT inouekazushi classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance |