Cargando…

Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance

The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taneja, Pankaj, Maglic, Dejan, Kai, Fumitake, Zhu, Sinan, Kendig, Robert D., Fry, Elizabeth A., Inoue, Kazushi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567632
_version_ 1782182250207510528
author Taneja, Pankaj
Maglic, Dejan
Kai, Fumitake
Zhu, Sinan
Kendig, Robert D.
Fry, Elizabeth A.
Inoue, Kazushi
author_facet Taneja, Pankaj
Maglic, Dejan
Kai, Fumitake
Zhu, Sinan
Kendig, Robert D.
Fry, Elizabeth A.
Inoue, Kazushi
author_sort Taneja, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14(ARF), TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits.
format Text
id pubmed-2883240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28832402010-06-21 Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance Taneja, Pankaj Maglic, Dejan Kai, Fumitake Zhu, Sinan Kendig, Robert D. Fry, Elizabeth A. Inoue, Kazushi Clin Med Insights Oncol Review The use of biomarkers ensures breast cancer patients receive optimal treatment. Established biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been playing significant roles in the selection and management of patients for endocrine therapy. HER2 is a strong predictor of response to trastuzumab. Recently, the roles of ER as a negative and HER2 as a positive indicator for chemotherapy have been established. Ki67 has traditionally been recognized as a poor prognostic factor, but recent studies suggest that measurement of Ki67-positive cells during treatment will more effectively predict treatment efficacy for both anti-hormonal and chemotherapy. p53 mutations are found in 20–35% of human breast cancers and are associated with aggressive disease with poor clinical outcome when the DNA-binding domain is mutated. The utility of cyclin D1 as a predictor of breast cancer prognosis is controversial, but cyclin D1b overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Likewise, overexpression of the low molecular weight form of cyclin E1 protein predicts poor prognosis. Breast cancers from BRCA1/2 carriers often show high nuclear grades, negativity to ER/PR/HER2, and p53 mutations, and thus, are associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic values of other molecular markers, such as p14(ARF), TBX2/3, VEGF in breast cancer are also discussed. Careful evaluation of these biomarkers with current treatment modality is required to determine whether their measurement or monitoring offer significant clinical benefits. Libertas Academica 2010-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2883240/ /pubmed/20567632 Text en © 2010 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Taneja, Pankaj
Maglic, Dejan
Kai, Fumitake
Zhu, Sinan
Kendig, Robert D.
Fry, Elizabeth A.
Inoue, Kazushi
Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title_full Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title_fullStr Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title_full_unstemmed Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title_short Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance
title_sort classical and novel prognostic markers for breast cancer and their clinical significance
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567632
work_keys_str_mv AT tanejapankaj classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT maglicdejan classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT kaifumitake classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT zhusinan classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT kendigrobertd classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT fryelizabetha classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance
AT inouekazushi classicalandnovelprognosticmarkersforbreastcancerandtheirclinicalsignificance