Cargando…

The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of two direct resin composites polished with one-step and multi-step polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The resin composites examined in this study include minifill-hybrid composite Esthet-X (DENTSPLY/Caulk, M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashetty, Kusum, Joshi, Sonal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20582217
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.62637
_version_ 1782182280263892992
author Bashetty, Kusum
Joshi, Sonal
author_facet Bashetty, Kusum
Joshi, Sonal
author_sort Bashetty, Kusum
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of two direct resin composites polished with one-step and multi-step polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The resin composites examined in this study include minifill-hybrid composite Esthet-X (DENTSPLY/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and packable composite Solitaire II (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc., Southbend). A total of 42 discs (10 × 2 mm), 21 specimens of each restorative material were fabricated. Seven specimens per composite group received no polishing treatment and served as control. For each composite group, the specimens were randomly divided into two polishing systems: One-step PoGo (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and multi-step Super Snap (Shofu, Inc. Kyoto, Japan). Polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions after being ground wet with 1200 grit silicon carbide paper. The surface roughness values were determined using a profilometer. RESULTS: Data was subjected to student's t test at a significance level of 0.05. The smoothest surfaces were achieved under Mylar strips in both the composite groups. Mean Ra values ranged from 0.09 to 0.3 μm for Esthet-X group and from 0.18 to 0.3 μm for Solitaire II with different polishing systems. The ranking of the order of surface roughness on the basis of the type of composite was as follows: Esthet-X < Solitaire II for PoGo system and Esthet-X = Solitaire II for Super Snap; and the ranking for the polishing system was: PoGo < Super Snap (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The one-step polishing system (PoGo) produced better surface quality in terms of roughness than the multi-step system (Super Snap) for minifill-hybrid composite (Esthet-X), and it was equivalent to Super Snap for packable composites (Solitaire II). Minifill-hybrid presented a better surface finish than Solitaire II when PoGo polishing system was used. No significant difference was present in surface roughness between both the materials when Super Snap system was used.
format Text
id pubmed-2883805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28838052010-06-25 The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites Bashetty, Kusum Joshi, Sonal J Conserv Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of two direct resin composites polished with one-step and multi-step polishing systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The resin composites examined in this study include minifill-hybrid composite Esthet-X (DENTSPLY/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and packable composite Solitaire II (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc., Southbend). A total of 42 discs (10 × 2 mm), 21 specimens of each restorative material were fabricated. Seven specimens per composite group received no polishing treatment and served as control. For each composite group, the specimens were randomly divided into two polishing systems: One-step PoGo (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and multi-step Super Snap (Shofu, Inc. Kyoto, Japan). Polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions after being ground wet with 1200 grit silicon carbide paper. The surface roughness values were determined using a profilometer. RESULTS: Data was subjected to student's t test at a significance level of 0.05. The smoothest surfaces were achieved under Mylar strips in both the composite groups. Mean Ra values ranged from 0.09 to 0.3 μm for Esthet-X group and from 0.18 to 0.3 μm for Solitaire II with different polishing systems. The ranking of the order of surface roughness on the basis of the type of composite was as follows: Esthet-X < Solitaire II for PoGo system and Esthet-X = Solitaire II for Super Snap; and the ranking for the polishing system was: PoGo < Super Snap (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The one-step polishing system (PoGo) produced better surface quality in terms of roughness than the multi-step system (Super Snap) for minifill-hybrid composite (Esthet-X), and it was equivalent to Super Snap for packable composites (Solitaire II). Minifill-hybrid presented a better surface finish than Solitaire II when PoGo polishing system was used. No significant difference was present in surface roughness between both the materials when Super Snap system was used. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2883805/ /pubmed/20582217 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.62637 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bashetty, Kusum
Joshi, Sonal
The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title_full The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title_fullStr The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title_full_unstemmed The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title_short The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
title_sort effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20582217
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.62637
work_keys_str_mv AT bashettykusum theeffectofonestepandmultisteppolishingsystemsonsurfacetextureoftwodifferentresincomposites
AT joshisonal theeffectofonestepandmultisteppolishingsystemsonsurfacetextureoftwodifferentresincomposites
AT bashettykusum effectofonestepandmultisteppolishingsystemsonsurfacetextureoftwodifferentresincomposites
AT joshisonal effectofonestepandmultisteppolishingsystemsonsurfacetextureoftwodifferentresincomposites