Cargando…

Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus

BACKGROUND: Coding sequence (CDS) length, gene size, and intron length vary within a genome and among genomes. Previous studies in diverse organisms, including human, D. Melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, and Arabidopsis thaliana, indicated that there are negative relationships between express...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, You S, Wang, Zhang F, Chai, Xue W, Wu, Guo Z, Zhou, Ming, Nie, Qing H, Zhang, Xi Q
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-35
_version_ 1782182297148063744
author Rao, You S
Wang, Zhang F
Chai, Xue W
Wu, Guo Z
Zhou, Ming
Nie, Qing H
Zhang, Xi Q
author_facet Rao, You S
Wang, Zhang F
Chai, Xue W
Wu, Guo Z
Zhou, Ming
Nie, Qing H
Zhang, Xi Q
author_sort Rao, You S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coding sequence (CDS) length, gene size, and intron length vary within a genome and among genomes. Previous studies in diverse organisms, including human, D. Melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, and Arabidopsis thaliana, indicated that there are negative relationships between expression level and gene size, CDS length as well as intron length. Different models such as selection for economy model, genomic design model, and mutational bias hypotheses have been proposed to explain such observation. The debate of which model is a superior one to explain the observation has not been settled down. The chicken (Gallus gallus) is an important model organism that bridges the evolutionary gap between mammals and other vertebrates. As D. Melanogaster, chicken has a larger effective population size, selection for chicken genome is expected to be more effective in increasing protein synthesis efficiency. Therefore, in this study the chicken was used as a model organism to elucidate the interaction between gene features and expression pattern upon selection pressure. RESULTS: Based on different technologies, we gathered expression data for nuclear protein coding, single-splicing genes from Gallus gallus genome and compared them with gene parameters. We found that gene size, CDS length, first intron length, average intron length, and total intron length are negatively correlated with expression level and expression breadth significantly. The tissue specificity is positively correlated with the first intron length but negatively correlated with the average intron length, and not correlated with the CDS length and protein domain numbers. Comparison analyses showed that ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels do not differ in compactness. Our data provided evidence that the genomic design model can not, at least in part, explain our observations. We grouped all somatic-tissue-specific genes (n = 1105), and compared the first intron length and the average intron length between highly expressed genes (top 5% expressed genes) and weakly expressed genes (bottom 5% expressed genes). We found that the first intron length and the average intron length in highly expressed genes are not different from that in weakly expressed genes. We also made a comparison between ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed somatic genes with similar expression levels. Our data demonstrated that ubiquitously expressed genes are less compact than narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels. Obviously, these observations can not be explained by mutational bias hypotheses either. We also found that the significant trend between genes' compactness and expression level could not be affected by local mutational biases. We argued that the selection of economy model is most likely one to explain the relationship between gene expression and gene characteristics in chicken genome. CONCLUSION: Natural selection appears to favor the compactness of highly expressed genes in chicken genome. This observation can be explained by the selection of economy model. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Gavin Huttley, Dr. Liran Carmel (nominated by Dr. Eugene V. Koonin) and Dr. Araxi Urrutia (nominated by Dr. Laurence D. Hurst).
format Text
id pubmed-2883972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28839722010-06-12 Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus Rao, You S Wang, Zhang F Chai, Xue W Wu, Guo Z Zhou, Ming Nie, Qing H Zhang, Xi Q Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: Coding sequence (CDS) length, gene size, and intron length vary within a genome and among genomes. Previous studies in diverse organisms, including human, D. Melanogaster, C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, and Arabidopsis thaliana, indicated that there are negative relationships between expression level and gene size, CDS length as well as intron length. Different models such as selection for economy model, genomic design model, and mutational bias hypotheses have been proposed to explain such observation. The debate of which model is a superior one to explain the observation has not been settled down. The chicken (Gallus gallus) is an important model organism that bridges the evolutionary gap between mammals and other vertebrates. As D. Melanogaster, chicken has a larger effective population size, selection for chicken genome is expected to be more effective in increasing protein synthesis efficiency. Therefore, in this study the chicken was used as a model organism to elucidate the interaction between gene features and expression pattern upon selection pressure. RESULTS: Based on different technologies, we gathered expression data for nuclear protein coding, single-splicing genes from Gallus gallus genome and compared them with gene parameters. We found that gene size, CDS length, first intron length, average intron length, and total intron length are negatively correlated with expression level and expression breadth significantly. The tissue specificity is positively correlated with the first intron length but negatively correlated with the average intron length, and not correlated with the CDS length and protein domain numbers. Comparison analyses showed that ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels do not differ in compactness. Our data provided evidence that the genomic design model can not, at least in part, explain our observations. We grouped all somatic-tissue-specific genes (n = 1105), and compared the first intron length and the average intron length between highly expressed genes (top 5% expressed genes) and weakly expressed genes (bottom 5% expressed genes). We found that the first intron length and the average intron length in highly expressed genes are not different from that in weakly expressed genes. We also made a comparison between ubiquitously expressed genes and narrowly expressed somatic genes with similar expression levels. Our data demonstrated that ubiquitously expressed genes are less compact than narrowly expressed genes with the similar expression levels. Obviously, these observations can not be explained by mutational bias hypotheses either. We also found that the significant trend between genes' compactness and expression level could not be affected by local mutational biases. We argued that the selection of economy model is most likely one to explain the relationship between gene expression and gene characteristics in chicken genome. CONCLUSION: Natural selection appears to favor the compactness of highly expressed genes in chicken genome. This observation can be explained by the selection of economy model. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr. Gavin Huttley, Dr. Liran Carmel (nominated by Dr. Eugene V. Koonin) and Dr. Araxi Urrutia (nominated by Dr. Laurence D. Hurst). BioMed Central 2010-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2883972/ /pubmed/20465857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-35 Text en Copyright ©2010 Rao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rao, You S
Wang, Zhang F
Chai, Xue W
Wu, Guo Z
Zhou, Ming
Nie, Qing H
Zhang, Xi Q
Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title_full Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title_fullStr Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title_full_unstemmed Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title_short Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus
title_sort selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in gallus gallus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20465857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-35
work_keys_str_mv AT raoyous selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT wangzhangf selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT chaixuew selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT wuguoz selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT zhouming selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT nieqingh selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus
AT zhangxiq selectionforthecompactnessofhighlyexpressedgenesingallusgallus