Cargando…

Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kritayakirana, Kritaya, M Maggio, Paul, Brundage, Susan, Purtill, Mary-Anne, Staudenmayer, Kristan, A Spain, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.62106
_version_ 1782182322086346752
author Kritayakirana, Kritaya
M Maggio, Paul
Brundage, Susan
Purtill, Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer, Kristan
A Spain, David
author_facet Kritayakirana, Kritaya
M Maggio, Paul
Brundage, Susan
Purtill, Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer, Kristan
A Spain, David
author_sort Kritayakirana, Kritaya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69%). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; P < 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n = 19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1–3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25–31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63% in the elective group, 60% in the urgent group, and 54% in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16%, 17%, and 11%, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35%, 31%, and 11%. CONCLUSION: Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2884440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28844402010-07-02 Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients Kritayakirana, Kritaya M Maggio, Paul Brundage, Susan Purtill, Mary-Anne Staudenmayer, Kristan A Spain, David J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69%). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; P < 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n = 19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1–3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25–31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63% in the elective group, 60% in the urgent group, and 54% in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16%, 17%, and 11%, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35%, 31%, and 11%. CONCLUSION: Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2884440/ /pubmed/20606786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.62106 Text en © Journal of Emergencies Trauma and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kritayakirana, Kritaya
M Maggio, Paul
Brundage, Susan
Purtill, Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer, Kristan
A Spain, David
Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_full Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_fullStr Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_short Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_sort outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606786
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.62106
work_keys_str_mv AT kritayakiranakritaya outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT mmaggiopaul outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT brundagesusan outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT purtillmaryanne outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT staudenmayerkristan outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT aspaindavid outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients