Cargando…

Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam

BACKGROUND: This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab, Hashim, Ahmad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3
_version_ 1782182359691427840
author Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab
Hashim, Ahmad
author_facet Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab
Hashim, Ahmad
author_sort Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fentanyl combined with either midazolam or propofol for any brief, intense procedure in the ED setting. AIMS: The objectives were to observe the occurrence of adverse events in subjects undergoing PSA for intense and painful procedures in the emergency department and to implement the use of capnography as a method of monitoring the patients when they were under PSA. METHODS: Forty patients were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups using the computer-generated random permuted blocks of four patients. Twenty patients were grouped together as group A and the remaining 20 patients as group B. Drugs used were single blinded to prevent any bias. Drug A was propofol and fentanyl, while drug B was midazolam and fentanyl. The procedures involved included orthopedic manipulation such as reduction of fractures, reduction of dislocated joints, abscess drainage, wound debridement, laceration wound repair and cardioversion. All of the subjects were monitored for their vital signs and end tidal carbon dioxide level every 10 min till the PSA was completed. The duration of stay in the ED was documented when the subjects had completed the procedure and were released from the department. RESULT: Of the study population, 75.6% were males. The mean age was 37.8 years (95% CI 33.2, 39.8). None of the patients developed any major complications while under PSA. The vital signs pre-, intra- and post-procedure were not significantly different in either the propofol or mizadolam groups (p value >0.05). CONCLUSION: This study had proven that there was no difference in adverse event occurrence between the studied drugs during PSA. Propofol can be recommended for use in PSA if the operator is well trained and familiar with the drug.
format Text
id pubmed-2885259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28852592010-07-02 Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab Hashim, Ahmad Int J Emerg Med Original Research Article BACKGROUND: This study examined the safety and effectiveness of the procedural sedation analgesia (PSA) technique carried out in the emergency department (ED) of a university hospital over a period of 1 year. The research was done to compare the effectiveness and efficacy of moderate sedation of fentanyl combined with either midazolam or propofol for any brief, intense procedure in the ED setting. AIMS: The objectives were to observe the occurrence of adverse events in subjects undergoing PSA for intense and painful procedures in the emergency department and to implement the use of capnography as a method of monitoring the patients when they were under PSA. METHODS: Forty patients were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two equal groups using the computer-generated random permuted blocks of four patients. Twenty patients were grouped together as group A and the remaining 20 patients as group B. Drugs used were single blinded to prevent any bias. Drug A was propofol and fentanyl, while drug B was midazolam and fentanyl. The procedures involved included orthopedic manipulation such as reduction of fractures, reduction of dislocated joints, abscess drainage, wound debridement, laceration wound repair and cardioversion. All of the subjects were monitored for their vital signs and end tidal carbon dioxide level every 10 min till the PSA was completed. The duration of stay in the ED was documented when the subjects had completed the procedure and were released from the department. RESULT: Of the study population, 75.6% were males. The mean age was 37.8 years (95% CI 33.2, 39.8). None of the patients developed any major complications while under PSA. The vital signs pre-, intra- and post-procedure were not significantly different in either the propofol or mizadolam groups (p value >0.05). CONCLUSION: This study had proven that there was no difference in adverse event occurrence between the studied drugs during PSA. Propofol can be recommended for use in PSA if the operator is well trained and familiar with the drug. Springer-Verlag 2010-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC2885259/ /pubmed/20606819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3 Text en © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Rahman, Nik Hisamuddin Nik Ab
Hashim, Ahmad
Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title_full Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title_fullStr Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title_full_unstemmed Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title_short Is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? A randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
title_sort is it safe to use propofol in the emergency department? a randomized controlled trial to compare propofol and midazolam
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20606819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0162-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmannikhisamuddinnikab isitsafetousepropofolintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparepropofolandmidazolam
AT hashimahmad isitsafetousepropofolintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparepropofolandmidazolam