Cargando…

Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishimura, Rimei, Tsujino, Daisuke, Taki, Kentaro, Morimoto, Aya, Tajima, Naoko
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16
_version_ 1782182371811917824
author Nishimura, Rimei
Tsujino, Daisuke
Taki, Kentaro
Morimoto, Aya
Tajima, Naoko
author_facet Nishimura, Rimei
Tsujino, Daisuke
Taki, Kentaro
Morimoto, Aya
Tajima, Naoko
author_sort Nishimura, Rimei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formulations. All subjects were hospitalized for 6 days and randomized to receive either Humalog Mix 25 (Mix 25) or Humalog Mix 50 (Mix 50). They were then crossed over to the other arm between day 3 and day 4 of the study. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed on all subjects to examine the differences in glycemic variability. RESULTS: Eleven type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled. No significant difference was found in 24-hour mean glucose values and their SDs, pre-meal glucose values, increases from pre-meal to peak glucose values, or time to peak glucose levels between either group. However, the mean glucose values observed during 0-8 hrs were significantly lower with Mix 25 compared to Mix 50 (128 vs. 147 mg/dL; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The twice-daily Mix 25 regimen provided superior overnight glycemic control compared to the Mix 50 regimen in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, both twice-daily regimens with either Mix 25 or Mix 50 provided inadequate post-lunch glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials UMIN000001327
format Text
id pubmed-2885326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28853262010-06-15 Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study Nishimura, Rimei Tsujino, Daisuke Taki, Kentaro Morimoto, Aya Tajima, Naoko Cardiovasc Diabetol Original investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formulations. All subjects were hospitalized for 6 days and randomized to receive either Humalog Mix 25 (Mix 25) or Humalog Mix 50 (Mix 50). They were then crossed over to the other arm between day 3 and day 4 of the study. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed on all subjects to examine the differences in glycemic variability. RESULTS: Eleven type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled. No significant difference was found in 24-hour mean glucose values and their SDs, pre-meal glucose values, increases from pre-meal to peak glucose values, or time to peak glucose levels between either group. However, the mean glucose values observed during 0-8 hrs were significantly lower with Mix 25 compared to Mix 50 (128 vs. 147 mg/dL; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The twice-daily Mix 25 regimen provided superior overnight glycemic control compared to the Mix 50 regimen in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, both twice-daily regimens with either Mix 25 or Mix 50 provided inadequate post-lunch glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials UMIN000001327 BioMed Central 2010-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2885326/ /pubmed/20438630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16 Text en Copyright ©2010 Nishimura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original investigation
Nishimura, Rimei
Tsujino, Daisuke
Taki, Kentaro
Morimoto, Aya
Tajima, Naoko
Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title_full Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title_fullStr Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title_full_unstemmed Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title_short Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
title_sort continuous glucose monitoring with humalog mix 25 versus humalog mix 50, twice daily: a comparative pilot study -results from the jikei-evaluation of insulin lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic variance (j-evolve) study
topic Original investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16
work_keys_str_mv AT nishimurarimei continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy
AT tsujinodaisuke continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy
AT takikentaro continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy
AT morimotoaya continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy
AT tajimanaoko continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy