Cargando…
Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16 |
_version_ | 1782182371811917824 |
---|---|
author | Nishimura, Rimei Tsujino, Daisuke Taki, Kentaro Morimoto, Aya Tajima, Naoko |
author_facet | Nishimura, Rimei Tsujino, Daisuke Taki, Kentaro Morimoto, Aya Tajima, Naoko |
author_sort | Nishimura, Rimei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formulations. All subjects were hospitalized for 6 days and randomized to receive either Humalog Mix 25 (Mix 25) or Humalog Mix 50 (Mix 50). They were then crossed over to the other arm between day 3 and day 4 of the study. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed on all subjects to examine the differences in glycemic variability. RESULTS: Eleven type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled. No significant difference was found in 24-hour mean glucose values and their SDs, pre-meal glucose values, increases from pre-meal to peak glucose values, or time to peak glucose levels between either group. However, the mean glucose values observed during 0-8 hrs were significantly lower with Mix 25 compared to Mix 50 (128 vs. 147 mg/dL; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The twice-daily Mix 25 regimen provided superior overnight glycemic control compared to the Mix 50 regimen in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, both twice-daily regimens with either Mix 25 or Mix 50 provided inadequate post-lunch glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials UMIN000001327 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2885326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28853262010-06-15 Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study Nishimura, Rimei Tsujino, Daisuke Taki, Kentaro Morimoto, Aya Tajima, Naoko Cardiovasc Diabetol Original investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glycemic variability associated with two different premixed insulin analogue formulations when used in a twice-daily regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects comprised type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 years, treated with twice daily premixed insulin or insulin analogue formulations. All subjects were hospitalized for 6 days and randomized to receive either Humalog Mix 25 (Mix 25) or Humalog Mix 50 (Mix 50). They were then crossed over to the other arm between day 3 and day 4 of the study. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed on all subjects to examine the differences in glycemic variability. RESULTS: Eleven type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled. No significant difference was found in 24-hour mean glucose values and their SDs, pre-meal glucose values, increases from pre-meal to peak glucose values, or time to peak glucose levels between either group. However, the mean glucose values observed during 0-8 hrs were significantly lower with Mix 25 compared to Mix 50 (128 vs. 147 mg/dL; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The twice-daily Mix 25 regimen provided superior overnight glycemic control compared to the Mix 50 regimen in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, both twice-daily regimens with either Mix 25 or Mix 50 provided inadequate post-lunch glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials UMIN000001327 BioMed Central 2010-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2885326/ /pubmed/20438630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16 Text en Copyright ©2010 Nishimura et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original investigation Nishimura, Rimei Tsujino, Daisuke Taki, Kentaro Morimoto, Aya Tajima, Naoko Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title | Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title_full | Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title_fullStr | Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title_short | Continuous glucose monitoring with Humalog Mix 25 versus Humalog Mix 50, twice daily: A comparative pilot study -Results from the Jikei-EValuation of insulin Lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic VariancE (J-EVOLVE) study |
title_sort | continuous glucose monitoring with humalog mix 25 versus humalog mix 50, twice daily: a comparative pilot study -results from the jikei-evaluation of insulin lispro mixture on pharmacodynamics and glycemic variance (j-evolve) study |
topic | Original investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishimurarimei continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy AT tsujinodaisuke continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy AT takikentaro continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy AT morimotoaya continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy AT tajimanaoko continuousglucosemonitoringwithhumalogmix25versushumalogmix50twicedailyacomparativepilotstudyresultsfromthejikeievaluationofinsulinlispromixtureonpharmacodynamicsandglycemicvariancejevolvestudy |