Cargando…

Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND: Final infarct size following coronary occlusion is determined by the duration of ischemia, the size of myocardium at risk (MaR) and reperfusion injury. The reference method for determining MaR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before reperfusion, is impractical in an ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sörensson, Peder, Heiberg, Einar, Saleh, Nawsad, Bouvier, Frederic, Caidahl, Kenneth, Tornvall, Per, Rydén, Lars, Pernow, John, Arheden, Håkan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-25
_version_ 1782182383557017600
author Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Saleh, Nawsad
Bouvier, Frederic
Caidahl, Kenneth
Tornvall, Per
Rydén, Lars
Pernow, John
Arheden, Håkan
author_facet Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Saleh, Nawsad
Bouvier, Frederic
Caidahl, Kenneth
Tornvall, Per
Rydén, Lars
Pernow, John
Arheden, Håkan
author_sort Sörensson, Peder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Final infarct size following coronary occlusion is determined by the duration of ischemia, the size of myocardium at risk (MaR) and reperfusion injury. The reference method for determining MaR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before reperfusion, is impractical in an acute setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether MaR can be determined from the contrast enhanced myocardium using steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed one week after the acute event in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with total coronary occlusion. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with STEMI (age 64 ± 8 years) received intravenous 99 m-Tc immediately before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. SPECT was performed within four hours. MaR was defined as the non-perfused myocardial volume derived with SPECT. CMR was performed 7.8 ± 1.2 days after the myocardial infarction using a protocol in which the contrast agent was administered before acquisition of short-axis SSFP cines. MaR was evaluated as the contrast enhanced myocardial volume in the cines by two blinded observers. MaR determined from the enhanced region on cine CMR correlated significantly with that derived with SPECT (r(2 )= 0.78, p < 0.001). The difference in MaR determined by CMR and SPECT was 0.5 ± 5.1% (mean ± SD). The interobserver variability of contrast enhanced cine SSFP measurements was 1.6 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD) of the left ventricle wall volume. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhanced SSFP cine CMR performed one week after acute infarction accurately depicts MaR prior to reperfusion in STEMI patients with total occlusion undergoing primary PCI. This suggests that a single CMR examination might be performed for determination of MaR and infarct size.
format Text
id pubmed-2885384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28853842010-06-15 Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography Sörensson, Peder Heiberg, Einar Saleh, Nawsad Bouvier, Frederic Caidahl, Kenneth Tornvall, Per Rydén, Lars Pernow, John Arheden, Håkan J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Final infarct size following coronary occlusion is determined by the duration of ischemia, the size of myocardium at risk (MaR) and reperfusion injury. The reference method for determining MaR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before reperfusion, is impractical in an acute setting. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether MaR can be determined from the contrast enhanced myocardium using steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed one week after the acute event in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with total coronary occlusion. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with STEMI (age 64 ± 8 years) received intravenous 99 m-Tc immediately before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. SPECT was performed within four hours. MaR was defined as the non-perfused myocardial volume derived with SPECT. CMR was performed 7.8 ± 1.2 days after the myocardial infarction using a protocol in which the contrast agent was administered before acquisition of short-axis SSFP cines. MaR was evaluated as the contrast enhanced myocardial volume in the cines by two blinded observers. MaR determined from the enhanced region on cine CMR correlated significantly with that derived with SPECT (r(2 )= 0.78, p < 0.001). The difference in MaR determined by CMR and SPECT was 0.5 ± 5.1% (mean ± SD). The interobserver variability of contrast enhanced cine SSFP measurements was 1.6 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD) of the left ventricle wall volume. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast enhanced SSFP cine CMR performed one week after acute infarction accurately depicts MaR prior to reperfusion in STEMI patients with total occlusion undergoing primary PCI. This suggests that a single CMR examination might be performed for determination of MaR and infarct size. BioMed Central 2010-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2885384/ /pubmed/20433716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-25 Text en Copyright ©2010 Sörensson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sörensson, Peder
Heiberg, Einar
Saleh, Nawsad
Bouvier, Frederic
Caidahl, Kenneth
Tornvall, Per
Rydén, Lars
Pernow, John
Arheden, Håkan
Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title_full Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title_fullStr Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title_short Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
title_sort assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2885384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-25
work_keys_str_mv AT sorenssonpeder assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT heibergeinar assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT salehnawsad assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT bouvierfrederic assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT caidahlkenneth assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT tornvallper assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT rydenlars assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT pernowjohn assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT arhedenhakan assessmentofmyocardiumatriskwithcontrastenhancedsteadystatefreeprecessioncinecardiovascularmagneticresonancecomparedtosinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography