Cargando…

Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies

PURPOSE: This review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vriens, Dennis, Visser, Eric P., de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee, Oyen, Wim J. G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2886126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1306-7
_version_ 1782182447924903936
author Vriens, Dennis
Visser, Eric P.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Oyen, Wim J. G.
author_facet Vriens, Dennis
Visser, Eric P.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Oyen, Wim J. G.
author_sort Vriens, Dennis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and research. METHODS: Structural PubMed searches have been performed for the many factors affecting quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Review articles and references lists have been used to supplement the search findings. RESULTS: Biological factors such as fasting blood glucose level, FDG uptake period, FDG distribution and clearance, patient motion (breathing) and patient discomfort (stress) all influence quantification. Acquisition parameters should be adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio without exposing the patient to a higher than strictly necessary radiation dose. This is especially challenging in pharmacokinetic analysis, where the temporal resolution is of significant importance. The literature is reviewed on the influence of attenuation correction on parameters for glucose metabolism, the effect of motion, metal artefacts and contrast agents on quantification of CT attenuation-corrected images. Reconstruction settings (analytical versus iterative reconstruction, post-reconstruction filtering and image matrix size) all potentially influence quantification due to artefacts, noise levels and lesion size dependency. Many region of interest definitions are available, but increased complexity does not necessarily result in improved performance. Different methods for the quantification of the tissue of interest can introduce systematic and random inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an up-to-date overview of the many factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET.
format Text
id pubmed-2886126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28861262010-07-21 Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies Vriens, Dennis Visser, Eric P. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Oyen, Wim J. G. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Review Article PURPOSE: This review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and research. METHODS: Structural PubMed searches have been performed for the many factors affecting quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Review articles and references lists have been used to supplement the search findings. RESULTS: Biological factors such as fasting blood glucose level, FDG uptake period, FDG distribution and clearance, patient motion (breathing) and patient discomfort (stress) all influence quantification. Acquisition parameters should be adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio without exposing the patient to a higher than strictly necessary radiation dose. This is especially challenging in pharmacokinetic analysis, where the temporal resolution is of significant importance. The literature is reviewed on the influence of attenuation correction on parameters for glucose metabolism, the effect of motion, metal artefacts and contrast agents on quantification of CT attenuation-corrected images. Reconstruction settings (analytical versus iterative reconstruction, post-reconstruction filtering and image matrix size) all potentially influence quantification due to artefacts, noise levels and lesion size dependency. Many region of interest definitions are available, but increased complexity does not necessarily result in improved performance. Different methods for the quantification of the tissue of interest can introduce systematic and random inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an up-to-date overview of the many factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Springer-Verlag 2009-11-20 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2886126/ /pubmed/19936745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1306-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Vriens, Dennis
Visser, Eric P.
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee
Oyen, Wim J. G.
Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title_full Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title_fullStr Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title_full_unstemmed Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title_short Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies
title_sort methodological considerations in quantification of oncological fdg pet studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2886126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19936745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1306-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vriensdennis methodologicalconsiderationsinquantificationofoncologicalfdgpetstudies
AT visserericp methodologicalconsiderationsinquantificationofoncologicalfdgpetstudies
AT degeusoeilioefee methodologicalconsiderationsinquantificationofoncologicalfdgpetstudies
AT oyenwimjg methodologicalconsiderationsinquantificationofoncologicalfdgpetstudies