Cargando…
Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and collea...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20359315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901 |
_version_ | 1782182510284767232 |
---|---|
author | Costa, Eduardo LV Amato, Marcelo BP |
author_facet | Costa, Eduardo LV Amato, Marcelo BP |
author_sort | Costa, Eduardo LV |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and colleagues applied a method based on electrical impedance tomography to help select the PEEP that minimized ventilation inhomogeneities. Though promising when alveolar collapse and overdistension are present, this method might be misleading in patients with normal lungs. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2887130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28871302011-03-22 Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? Costa, Eduardo LV Amato, Marcelo BP Crit Care Commentary Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and colleagues applied a method based on electrical impedance tomography to help select the PEEP that minimized ventilation inhomogeneities. Though promising when alveolar collapse and overdistension are present, this method might be misleading in patients with normal lungs. BioMed Central 2010 2010-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2887130/ /pubmed/20359315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Costa, Eduardo LV Amato, Marcelo BP Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title | Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title_full | Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title_fullStr | Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title_short | Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
title_sort | can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20359315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costaeduardolv canheterogeneityinventilationbegood AT amatomarcelobp canheterogeneityinventilationbegood |