Cargando…

Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?

Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and collea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Eduardo LV, Amato, Marcelo BP
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20359315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901
_version_ 1782182510284767232
author Costa, Eduardo LV
Amato, Marcelo BP
author_facet Costa, Eduardo LV
Amato, Marcelo BP
author_sort Costa, Eduardo LV
collection PubMed
description Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and colleagues applied a method based on electrical impedance tomography to help select the PEEP that minimized ventilation inhomogeneities. Though promising when alveolar collapse and overdistension are present, this method might be misleading in patients with normal lungs.
format Text
id pubmed-2887130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28871302011-03-22 Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good? Costa, Eduardo LV Amato, Marcelo BP Crit Care Commentary Selection of the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to avoid ventilator-induced lung injury in patients under mechanical ventilation is still a matter of debate. Many methods are available, but none is considered the gold standard. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Zhao and colleagues applied a method based on electrical impedance tomography to help select the PEEP that minimized ventilation inhomogeneities. Though promising when alveolar collapse and overdistension are present, this method might be misleading in patients with normal lungs. BioMed Central 2010 2010-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2887130/ /pubmed/20359315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Costa, Eduardo LV
Amato, Marcelo BP
Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title_full Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title_fullStr Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title_full_unstemmed Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title_short Can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
title_sort can heterogeneity in ventilation be good?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20359315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8901
work_keys_str_mv AT costaeduardolv canheterogeneityinventilationbegood
AT amatomarcelobp canheterogeneityinventilationbegood