Cargando…
A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20380720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956 |
_version_ | 1782182522234339328 |
---|---|
author | Jackson, Daniel L Proudfoot, Clare W Cann, Kimberley F Walsh, Tim |
author_facet | Jackson, Daniel L Proudfoot, Clare W Cann, Kimberley F Walsh, Tim |
author_sort | Jackson, Daniel L |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in sedated patients in the ICU and which compared the impact of changes in or different protocols for sedation management on economic and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL online literature databases from 1988 to 15(th )May 2008 and hand searched conferences. English-language studies set in the ICU, in sedated adult humans on mechanical ventilation, which reported the impact of sedation practice on cost and resource use and patient safety outcomes, were included. All abstracts were reviewed twice by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts resolved by a third reviewer, to check that they met the review inclusion criteria. Full-text papers of all included studies were retrieved and again reviewed twice against inclusion criteria. Data were doubly extracted from studies. Study aims, design, population, and outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, costs and rates of mortality and adverse events were extracted. Due to heterogeneity between study designs and outcomes reported, no quantitative data synthesis such as meta-analysis was possible. RESULTS: Included studies varied in design, patient population and aim, with the majority being before-after studies. Overall, studies showed that improvements in sedation practice, such as the introduction of guidelines and protocols, or daily interruption of sedation, were associated with improvements in outcomes including ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and costs. Mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infections were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic interventions to improve sedation practice and maintain patients at an optimal sedation level in the ICU may improve patient outcomes and optimize resource usage. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2887180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28871802010-06-18 A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety Jackson, Daniel L Proudfoot, Clare W Cann, Kimberley F Walsh, Tim Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in sedated patients in the ICU and which compared the impact of changes in or different protocols for sedation management on economic and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL online literature databases from 1988 to 15(th )May 2008 and hand searched conferences. English-language studies set in the ICU, in sedated adult humans on mechanical ventilation, which reported the impact of sedation practice on cost and resource use and patient safety outcomes, were included. All abstracts were reviewed twice by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts resolved by a third reviewer, to check that they met the review inclusion criteria. Full-text papers of all included studies were retrieved and again reviewed twice against inclusion criteria. Data were doubly extracted from studies. Study aims, design, population, and outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, costs and rates of mortality and adverse events were extracted. Due to heterogeneity between study designs and outcomes reported, no quantitative data synthesis such as meta-analysis was possible. RESULTS: Included studies varied in design, patient population and aim, with the majority being before-after studies. Overall, studies showed that improvements in sedation practice, such as the introduction of guidelines and protocols, or daily interruption of sedation, were associated with improvements in outcomes including ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and costs. Mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infections were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic interventions to improve sedation practice and maintain patients at an optimal sedation level in the ICU may improve patient outcomes and optimize resource usage. BioMed Central 2010 2010-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2887180/ /pubmed/20380720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956 Text en Copyright ©2010 Jackson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Jackson, Daniel L Proudfoot, Clare W Cann, Kimberley F Walsh, Tim A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title | A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title_full | A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title_short | A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety |
title_sort | systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the icu on resource use, costs and patient safety |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20380720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacksondaniell asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT proudfootclarew asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT cannkimberleyf asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT walshtim asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT jacksondaniell systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT proudfootclarew systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT cannkimberleyf systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety AT walshtim systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety |