Cargando…

A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety

INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Daniel L, Proudfoot, Clare W, Cann, Kimberley F, Walsh, Tim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20380720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956
_version_ 1782182522234339328
author Jackson, Daniel L
Proudfoot, Clare W
Cann, Kimberley F
Walsh, Tim
author_facet Jackson, Daniel L
Proudfoot, Clare W
Cann, Kimberley F
Walsh, Tim
author_sort Jackson, Daniel L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in sedated patients in the ICU and which compared the impact of changes in or different protocols for sedation management on economic and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL online literature databases from 1988 to 15(th )May 2008 and hand searched conferences. English-language studies set in the ICU, in sedated adult humans on mechanical ventilation, which reported the impact of sedation practice on cost and resource use and patient safety outcomes, were included. All abstracts were reviewed twice by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts resolved by a third reviewer, to check that they met the review inclusion criteria. Full-text papers of all included studies were retrieved and again reviewed twice against inclusion criteria. Data were doubly extracted from studies. Study aims, design, population, and outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, costs and rates of mortality and adverse events were extracted. Due to heterogeneity between study designs and outcomes reported, no quantitative data synthesis such as meta-analysis was possible. RESULTS: Included studies varied in design, patient population and aim, with the majority being before-after studies. Overall, studies showed that improvements in sedation practice, such as the introduction of guidelines and protocols, or daily interruption of sedation, were associated with improvements in outcomes including ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and costs. Mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infections were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic interventions to improve sedation practice and maintain patients at an optimal sedation level in the ICU may improve patient outcomes and optimize resource usage.
format Text
id pubmed-2887180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28871802010-06-18 A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety Jackson, Daniel L Proudfoot, Clare W Cann, Kimberley F Walsh, Tim Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) often receive sedation for prolonged periods. In order to better understand the impact of sub-optimal sedation practice on outcomes, we performed a systematic review, including observational studies and controlled trials which were conducted in sedated patients in the ICU and which compared the impact of changes in or different protocols for sedation management on economic and patient safety outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL online literature databases from 1988 to 15(th )May 2008 and hand searched conferences. English-language studies set in the ICU, in sedated adult humans on mechanical ventilation, which reported the impact of sedation practice on cost and resource use and patient safety outcomes, were included. All abstracts were reviewed twice by two independent reviewers, with all conflicts resolved by a third reviewer, to check that they met the review inclusion criteria. Full-text papers of all included studies were retrieved and again reviewed twice against inclusion criteria. Data were doubly extracted from studies. Study aims, design, population, and outcomes including duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, costs and rates of mortality and adverse events were extracted. Due to heterogeneity between study designs and outcomes reported, no quantitative data synthesis such as meta-analysis was possible. RESULTS: Included studies varied in design, patient population and aim, with the majority being before-after studies. Overall, studies showed that improvements in sedation practice, such as the introduction of guidelines and protocols, or daily interruption of sedation, were associated with improvements in outcomes including ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and costs. Mortality and the incidence of nosocomial infections were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic interventions to improve sedation practice and maintain patients at an optimal sedation level in the ICU may improve patient outcomes and optimize resource usage. BioMed Central 2010 2010-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2887180/ /pubmed/20380720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956 Text en Copyright ©2010 Jackson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Jackson, Daniel L
Proudfoot, Clare W
Cann, Kimberley F
Walsh, Tim
A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title_full A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title_fullStr A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title_short A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety
title_sort systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the icu on resource use, costs and patient safety
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20380720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8956
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksondaniell asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT proudfootclarew asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT cannkimberleyf asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT walshtim asystematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT jacksondaniell systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT proudfootclarew systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT cannkimberleyf systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety
AT walshtim systematicreviewoftheimpactofsedationpracticeintheicuonresourceusecostsandpatientsafety