Cargando…

Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial

INTRODUCTION: Critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) is a common complication of critical illness presenting with muscle weakness and is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and weaning period. No preventive tool and no specific treatment have been proposed so far for CIP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Routsi, Christina, Gerovasili, Vasiliki, Vasileiadis, Ioannis, Karatzanos, Eleftherios, Pitsolis, Theodore, Tripodaki, Elli, Markaki, Vasiliki, Zervakis, Dimitrios, Nanas, Serafim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20426834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8987
_version_ 1782182526281842688
author Routsi, Christina
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Pitsolis, Theodore
Tripodaki, Elli
Markaki, Vasiliki
Zervakis, Dimitrios
Nanas, Serafim
author_facet Routsi, Christina
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Pitsolis, Theodore
Tripodaki, Elli
Markaki, Vasiliki
Zervakis, Dimitrios
Nanas, Serafim
author_sort Routsi, Christina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) is a common complication of critical illness presenting with muscle weakness and is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and weaning period. No preventive tool and no specific treatment have been proposed so far for CIPNM. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of EMS in preventing CIPNM in critically ill patients. METHODS: One hundred and forty consecutive critically ill patients with an APACHE II score ≥ 13 were randomly assigned after stratification to the EMS group (n = 68) (age:61 ± 19 years) (APACHE II:18 ± 4, SOFA:9 ± 3) or to the control group (n = 72) (age:58 ± 18 years) (APACHE II:18 ± 5, SOFA:9 ± 3). Patients of the EMS group received daily EMS sessions. CIPNM was diagnosed clinically with the medical research council (MRC) scale for muscle strength (maximum score 60, <48/60 cut off for diagnosis) by two unblinded independent investigators. Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty two patients could be finally evaluated with MRC; 24 in the EMS group and 28 in the control group. CIPNM was diagnosed in 3 patients in the EMS group as compared to 11 patients in the control group (OR = 0.22; CI: 0.05 to 0.92, P = 0.04). The MRC score was significantly higher in patients of the EMS group as compared to the control group [58 (33 to 60) vs. 52 (2 to 60) respectively, median (range), P = 0.04). The weaning period was statistically significantly shorter in patients of the EMS group vs. the control group [1 (0 to 10) days vs. 3 (0 to 44) days, respectively, median (range), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that daily EMS sessions prevent the development of CIPNM in critically ill patients and also result in shorter duration of weaning. Further studies should evaluate which patients benefit more from EMS and explore the EMS characteristics most appropriate for preventing CIPNM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00882830
format Text
id pubmed-2887197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28871972010-06-18 Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial Routsi, Christina Gerovasili, Vasiliki Vasileiadis, Ioannis Karatzanos, Eleftherios Pitsolis, Theodore Tripodaki, Elli Markaki, Vasiliki Zervakis, Dimitrios Nanas, Serafim Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) is a common complication of critical illness presenting with muscle weakness and is associated with increased duration of mechanical ventilation and weaning period. No preventive tool and no specific treatment have been proposed so far for CIPNM. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of EMS in preventing CIPNM in critically ill patients. METHODS: One hundred and forty consecutive critically ill patients with an APACHE II score ≥ 13 were randomly assigned after stratification to the EMS group (n = 68) (age:61 ± 19 years) (APACHE II:18 ± 4, SOFA:9 ± 3) or to the control group (n = 72) (age:58 ± 18 years) (APACHE II:18 ± 5, SOFA:9 ± 3). Patients of the EMS group received daily EMS sessions. CIPNM was diagnosed clinically with the medical research council (MRC) scale for muscle strength (maximum score 60, <48/60 cut off for diagnosis) by two unblinded independent investigators. Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty two patients could be finally evaluated with MRC; 24 in the EMS group and 28 in the control group. CIPNM was diagnosed in 3 patients in the EMS group as compared to 11 patients in the control group (OR = 0.22; CI: 0.05 to 0.92, P = 0.04). The MRC score was significantly higher in patients of the EMS group as compared to the control group [58 (33 to 60) vs. 52 (2 to 60) respectively, median (range), P = 0.04). The weaning period was statistically significantly shorter in patients of the EMS group vs. the control group [1 (0 to 10) days vs. 3 (0 to 44) days, respectively, median (range), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that daily EMS sessions prevent the development of CIPNM in critically ill patients and also result in shorter duration of weaning. Further studies should evaluate which patients benefit more from EMS and explore the EMS characteristics most appropriate for preventing CIPNM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00882830 BioMed Central 2010 2010-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2887197/ /pubmed/20426834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8987 Text en Copyright ©2010 Routsi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Routsi, Christina
Gerovasili, Vasiliki
Vasileiadis, Ioannis
Karatzanos, Eleftherios
Pitsolis, Theodore
Tripodaki, Elli
Markaki, Vasiliki
Zervakis, Dimitrios
Nanas, Serafim
Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title_full Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title_fullStr Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title_full_unstemmed Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title_short Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
title_sort electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20426834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8987
work_keys_str_mv AT routsichristina electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT gerovasilivasiliki electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT vasileiadisioannis electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT karatzanoseleftherios electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT pitsolistheodore electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT tripodakielli electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT markakivasiliki electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT zervakisdimitrios electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial
AT nanasserafim electricalmusclestimulationpreventscriticalillnesspolyneuromyopathyarandomizedparallelinterventiontrial