Cargando…
Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a new feeding protocol designed to enhance the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: In a prospective before and after study, we evaluated a new protocol compared to our standard feeding p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20429886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8991 |
_version_ | 1782182527215075328 |
---|---|
author | Heyland, Daren K Cahill, Naomi E Dhaliwal, Rupinder Wang, Miao Day, Andrew G Alenzi, Ahmed Aris, Fiona Muscedere, John Drover, John W McClave, Stephen A |
author_facet | Heyland, Daren K Cahill, Naomi E Dhaliwal, Rupinder Wang, Miao Day, Andrew G Alenzi, Ahmed Aris, Fiona Muscedere, John Drover, John W McClave, Stephen A |
author_sort | Heyland, Daren K |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a new feeding protocol designed to enhance the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: In a prospective before and after study, we evaluated a new protocol compared to our standard feeding protocol. Innovative elements of the new protocol included setting daily volume based goals instead of hourly rate targets, initiating motility agents and protein supplements on Day 1, liberalizing the gastric residual volume threshold, and the option to use trophic feeds. Bedside nurses filled out questionnaires to assess the acceptability of the new approach and we assessed patients' nutritional and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 mechanically ventilated patients who stayed in the Intensive Care Unit for more than three days in the before group and 30 such patients in the after group. On a scale where 1 = totally unacceptable and 10 = totally acceptable, 30 nurses rated the new protocol as 7.1 (range 1 to 10) and no incidents compromising patient safety were observed. In the before group, on average, patients received 58.8% of their energy and 61.2% of their protein requirements by EN compared to 67.9% and 73.6% in the after group (P = 0.33 and 0.13). When the subgroup of patients prescribed to receive full volume feeds in the after group were evaluated (n = 18), they received 83.2% and 89.4% of their energy and protein requirements by EN respectively (P = 0.02 for energy and 0.002 for protein compared to the before group). The rates of vomiting, regurgitation, aspiration, and pneumonia were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This new feeding protocol seems to be safe and acceptable to critical care nurses. The adoption of this protocol may be associated with enhanced delivery of EN but further trials are warranted to evaluate its effect on nutritional and clinical endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01102348 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2887201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-28872012010-06-18 Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol Heyland, Daren K Cahill, Naomi E Dhaliwal, Rupinder Wang, Miao Day, Andrew G Alenzi, Ahmed Aris, Fiona Muscedere, John Drover, John W McClave, Stephen A Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a new feeding protocol designed to enhance the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN). METHODS: In a prospective before and after study, we evaluated a new protocol compared to our standard feeding protocol. Innovative elements of the new protocol included setting daily volume based goals instead of hourly rate targets, initiating motility agents and protein supplements on Day 1, liberalizing the gastric residual volume threshold, and the option to use trophic feeds. Bedside nurses filled out questionnaires to assess the acceptability of the new approach and we assessed patients' nutritional and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 mechanically ventilated patients who stayed in the Intensive Care Unit for more than three days in the before group and 30 such patients in the after group. On a scale where 1 = totally unacceptable and 10 = totally acceptable, 30 nurses rated the new protocol as 7.1 (range 1 to 10) and no incidents compromising patient safety were observed. In the before group, on average, patients received 58.8% of their energy and 61.2% of their protein requirements by EN compared to 67.9% and 73.6% in the after group (P = 0.33 and 0.13). When the subgroup of patients prescribed to receive full volume feeds in the after group were evaluated (n = 18), they received 83.2% and 89.4% of their energy and protein requirements by EN respectively (P = 0.02 for energy and 0.002 for protein compared to the before group). The rates of vomiting, regurgitation, aspiration, and pneumonia were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This new feeding protocol seems to be safe and acceptable to critical care nurses. The adoption of this protocol may be associated with enhanced delivery of EN but further trials are warranted to evaluate its effect on nutritional and clinical endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01102348 BioMed Central 2010 2010-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2887201/ /pubmed/20429886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8991 Text en Copyright ©2010 Heyland et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Heyland, Daren K Cahill, Naomi E Dhaliwal, Rupinder Wang, Miao Day, Andrew G Alenzi, Ahmed Aris, Fiona Muscedere, John Drover, John W McClave, Stephen A Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title | Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title_full | Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title_fullStr | Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title_short | Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol |
title_sort | enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the pep up protocol |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20429886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc8991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heylanddarenk enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT cahillnaomie enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT dhaliwalrupinder enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT wangmiao enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT dayandrewg enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT alenziahmed enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT arisfiona enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT muscederejohn enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT droverjohnw enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol AT mcclavestephena enhancedproteinenergyprovisionviatheenteralrouteincriticallyillpatientsasinglecenterfeasibilitytrialofthepepupprotocol |