Cargando…

Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task

This study addresses force/movement control in a dynamic “hybrid” task: the master sub-task is continuous manual tracking of a target moving along an eight-shaped Lissajous figure, with the tracking error as the primary performance index; the slave sub-task is compensation of a disturbing curl visco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Squeri, Valentina, Masia, Lorenzo, Casadio, Maura, Morasso, Pietro, Vergaro, Elena
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011189
_version_ 1782182538358292480
author Squeri, Valentina
Masia, Lorenzo
Casadio, Maura
Morasso, Pietro
Vergaro, Elena
author_facet Squeri, Valentina
Masia, Lorenzo
Casadio, Maura
Morasso, Pietro
Vergaro, Elena
author_sort Squeri, Valentina
collection PubMed
description This study addresses force/movement control in a dynamic “hybrid” task: the master sub-task is continuous manual tracking of a target moving along an eight-shaped Lissajous figure, with the tracking error as the primary performance index; the slave sub-task is compensation of a disturbing curl viscous field, compatibly with the primary performance index. The two sub-tasks are correlated because the lateral force the subject must exert on the eight-shape must be proportional to the longitudinal movement speed in order to perform a good tracking. The results confirm that visuo-manual tracking is characterized by an intermittent control mechanism, in agreement with previous work; the novel finding is that the overall control patterns are not altered by the presence of a large deviating force field, if compared with the undisturbed condition. It is also found that the control of interaction-forces is achieved by a combination of arm stiffness properties and direct force control, as suggested by the systematic lateral deviation of the trajectories from the nominal path and the comparison between perturbed trials and catch trials. The coordination of the two sub-tasks is quickly learnt after the activation of the deviating force field and is achieved by a combination of force and the stiffness components (about 80% vs. 20%), which is a function of the implicit accuracy of the tracking task.
format Text
id pubmed-2887367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-28873672010-06-21 Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task Squeri, Valentina Masia, Lorenzo Casadio, Maura Morasso, Pietro Vergaro, Elena PLoS One Research Article This study addresses force/movement control in a dynamic “hybrid” task: the master sub-task is continuous manual tracking of a target moving along an eight-shaped Lissajous figure, with the tracking error as the primary performance index; the slave sub-task is compensation of a disturbing curl viscous field, compatibly with the primary performance index. The two sub-tasks are correlated because the lateral force the subject must exert on the eight-shape must be proportional to the longitudinal movement speed in order to perform a good tracking. The results confirm that visuo-manual tracking is characterized by an intermittent control mechanism, in agreement with previous work; the novel finding is that the overall control patterns are not altered by the presence of a large deviating force field, if compared with the undisturbed condition. It is also found that the control of interaction-forces is achieved by a combination of arm stiffness properties and direct force control, as suggested by the systematic lateral deviation of the trajectories from the nominal path and the comparison between perturbed trials and catch trials. The coordination of the two sub-tasks is quickly learnt after the activation of the deviating force field and is achieved by a combination of force and the stiffness components (about 80% vs. 20%), which is a function of the implicit accuracy of the tracking task. Public Library of Science 2010-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2887367/ /pubmed/20567516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011189 Text en Squeri et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Squeri, Valentina
Masia, Lorenzo
Casadio, Maura
Morasso, Pietro
Vergaro, Elena
Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title_full Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title_fullStr Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title_full_unstemmed Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title_short Force-Field Compensation in a Manual Tracking Task
title_sort force-field compensation in a manual tracking task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20567516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011189
work_keys_str_mv AT squerivalentina forcefieldcompensationinamanualtrackingtask
AT masialorenzo forcefieldcompensationinamanualtrackingtask
AT casadiomaura forcefieldcompensationinamanualtrackingtask
AT morassopietro forcefieldcompensationinamanualtrackingtask
AT vergaroelena forcefieldcompensationinamanualtrackingtask